Rocket In My Pocket

Members
  • Content count

    932
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

878 Excellent

4 Followers

About Rocket In My Pocket

  • Rank
    Rocket Scientist
  1. http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Structural_Fuselage Because the hole through the middle is actually real and usable! (Unlike every other part with one.) You can do a lot of fun/creative things with this simple part.
  2. I'm honestly surprised so many of you are buying into this "apology" video. Of course he owned up to it, of course he made a video apologizing, of course he "regrets" doing it now that he's been caught. Do you think he'd be regretting it or apologizing publicly if he had gotten away with it? No. So what other choice did he have then? Quit Youtube? This was the best move he could make from a PR stand point, and you are all eating it right out of his hand. I have no problem forgiving him, I honestly don't really care that much; but I certainly won't forget. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...
  3. No, no you are right; I can't claim to know his motivations like it's a fact. I should also have cited some of the evidence, but in my haste; I assumed we were all familiar with the subject at hand. This really irks me though, it shows such a blatant lack of respect for his viewers and their intelligence. To me, it comes off as trying to get more viewers and more subs at the cost of anything including integrity. Think of all the players who tried to recreate these builds/ideas, inspired by his amazing feats only to be crushed by their perceived inability to do what he did. My grandfather always said; The only thing worse than a liar is a cheat, the only thing worse than a cheat is a thief... This guy is all three.
  4. There is undeniable proof he cheated, he admits to cheating. Several of his videos have come under suspicion of cheating before this ever happened. Claiming that he's cheating in order to drive up viewership is admittedly assumption on my part, but I wouldn't call it an "extraordinary" claim. In fact I find it to be quite ordinary and mundane, the simplest and most obvious reason. I agree though, this is just my opinion; which I'm sharing with everyone here: Boycott Hazard-ish and his channel.
  5. This is unacceptable and frankly unforgivable. His recent backpedaling and excuses only makes it worse. This guy cares about one thing and one thing only, his viewer count and the profit it can bring him. Don't buy into his BS, boycott him and his channel.
  6. Neither forum will be the same without you around Sal_vager. Best of luck in your future endeavours! -RIMP/Chibbity
  7. Love KSP. Hate cake. No option for pie fans?
  8. In regards to your first problem, it's an inherent part of the way the game's rocket design works and most likely won't be changed. Rocket's are built on a "tree" system with every part having a parent part, you'll have to learn to work around this limitation. As far as your second issue with the camera, I use and highly recommend:
  9. It would help us help you if you gave us some basic information about your computer: CPU/GPU/Ram/Vram etc... Also, what graphics settings are you playing on? Be as specific as possible, any small detail may help. Also, also, welcome to the forums!
  10. 1. Yeah, those are theories, not facts. To be a scientific fact you'd have to have a complete understanding and explanation for how/why they work, which we don't. 2. Proof on paper isn't proof, it's just more theory. It can be "proven" on paper that 1=0 or that 1+1=3 but that doesn't make it true. (Google it.) 3. "The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry is commonly based on empirical or measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning." How does this not support exactly what I said? Without evidence it can't be considered scientific fact. I think we've all derailed this guys thread enough, My main point was that since KSP as a game only covers one solar system, the odds of discovering life again in a system that already has it is pretty darn slim. thus making the entire mod concept a little unreasonable. If any one would like to continue discussing what is/isn't scientific theory/fact or what forms of life are likely to exist or not I suggest you make a new thread in the "Science and Spaceflight" section.
  11. The basis of all scientific discovery is a hypothesis which is then proven to be fact. I have no problem with theories, and I never said they should be "discarded" but you can't present them as facts or even as viable alternatives to proven facts. Saying "Silicon based life is probably possible" is very, very different from saying "I have found silicone based life and thus proved it's existence." So yes, there is reason to assume that Earth like life is the only form of life because it's the only one we've actually proven. That's how the scientific method works.
  12. You are welcome to your opinion. However the facts available to humanity at the present; point to life, and life supporting worlds being exceedingly rare. The only known, proven form of life is carbon, which requires (among other very rare things) some form of liquid water. While liquid water can exist outside the habitable zone, it will be found in the greatest amounts and with the greatest ease of access inside them. Making life far, far more likely to be able to develop within the "Goldilocks zone" than anywhere else. If you have evidence to the contrary, perhaps you should be so good as to share it with the rest of the scientific world?
  13. Here's an Autohotkey script that claims to do just that for any Windows program. http://www.freewaregenius.com/singleinstance-allow-only-one-running-instance-of-a-program/ You'll need Autohotkey obviously: (It's free.) https://autohotkey.com/
  14. Personally I recommend: Not only will you get better performance, but I think the style/artistic direction is superior. (Also you don't need Scatterer to go with it, unlike other cloud mods.) As far as your issue with clouds, I'm not sure if that mod comes bundled with EVE, but I'm pretty sure you need it. (You also need Scatterer I think, but it's been so long since I installed this lol.)