Rocket In My Pocket

Members
  • Content count

    936
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

880 Excellent

4 Followers

About Rocket In My Pocket

  • Rank
    Rocket Scientist
  1. If using that node is wrong, I don't want to be right.
  2. I think if you downloaded another EVE cloud config and put it in Game data you could switch and load that one in game via the EVE menu. Not entirely sure though. Alt+0 brings up the menu by the way.
  3. It's an issue with Unity. Squad can't fix or change it. Can we please let this poor horse rest? It's been dead for ages.
  4. Just downloaded the latest release and ran into two small issues. The change log says: "The mk1 demo cockpit has had its hatch rotated 90 degrees so it doesn't look so odd, thanks to hidude398. Issue #619." However in game for me, it's most certainly rotated the wrong way (Horizontally instead of vertically if you understand my meaning), leaving a giant gaping whole in the side of the cockpit where the closed door should be. The Mk1 inline cockpit changes seem to be missing as well as it's completely stock with no MFD's. The presence of .cfg files for it in the folders seems to imply it's supposed to exist. However it's .cfg files were named as .nocfg files, taking the "no" out did not make the changes appear though.
  5. http://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Structural_Fuselage Because the hole through the middle is actually real and usable! (Unlike every other part with one.) You can do a lot of fun/creative things with this simple part.
  6. I'm honestly surprised so many of you are buying into this "apology" video. Of course he owned up to it, of course he made a video apologizing, of course he "regrets" doing it now that he's been caught. Do you think he'd be regretting it or apologizing publicly if he had gotten away with it? No. So what other choice did he have then? Quit Youtube? This was the best move he could make from a PR stand point, and you are all eating it right out of his hand. I have no problem forgiving him, I honestly don't really care that much; but I certainly won't forget. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...
  7. No, no you are right; I can't claim to know his motivations like it's a fact. I should also have cited some of the evidence, but in my haste; I assumed we were all familiar with the subject at hand. This really irks me though, it shows such a blatant lack of respect for his viewers and their intelligence. To me, it comes off as trying to get more viewers and more subs at the cost of anything including integrity. Think of all the players who tried to recreate these builds/ideas, inspired by his amazing feats only to be crushed by their perceived inability to do what he did. My grandfather always said; The only thing worse than a liar is a cheat, the only thing worse than a cheat is a thief... This guy is all three.
  8. There is undeniable proof he cheated, he admits to cheating. Several of his videos have come under suspicion of cheating before this ever happened. Claiming that he's cheating in order to drive up viewership is admittedly assumption on my part, but I wouldn't call it an "extraordinary" claim. In fact I find it to be quite ordinary and mundane, the simplest and most obvious reason. I agree though, this is just my opinion; which I'm sharing with everyone here: Boycott Hazard-ish and his channel.
  9. This is unacceptable and frankly unforgivable. His recent backpedaling and excuses only makes it worse. This guy cares about one thing and one thing only, his viewer count and the profit it can bring him. Don't buy into his BS, boycott him and his channel.
  10. Neither forum will be the same without you around Sal_vager. Best of luck in your future endeavours! -RIMP/Chibbity
  11. Love KSP. Hate cake. No option for pie fans?
  12. In regards to your first problem, it's an inherent part of the way the game's rocket design works and most likely won't be changed. Rocket's are built on a "tree" system with every part having a parent part, you'll have to learn to work around this limitation. As far as your second issue with the camera, I use and highly recommend:
  13. It would help us help you if you gave us some basic information about your computer: CPU/GPU/Ram/Vram etc... Also, what graphics settings are you playing on? Be as specific as possible, any small detail may help. Also, also, welcome to the forums!
  14. 1. Yeah, those are theories, not facts. To be a scientific fact you'd have to have a complete understanding and explanation for how/why they work, which we don't. 2. Proof on paper isn't proof, it's just more theory. It can be "proven" on paper that 1=0 or that 1+1=3 but that doesn't make it true. (Google it.) 3. "The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry is commonly based on empirical or measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning." How does this not support exactly what I said? Without evidence it can't be considered scientific fact. I think we've all derailed this guys thread enough, My main point was that since KSP as a game only covers one solar system, the odds of discovering life again in a system that already has it is pretty darn slim. thus making the entire mod concept a little unreasonable. If any one would like to continue discussing what is/isn't scientific theory/fact or what forms of life are likely to exist or not I suggest you make a new thread in the "Science and Spaceflight" section.