Razum

I figured out that my Pwing mass problem caused by this mod: https://github.com/Crzyrndm/B9-PWings-Fork In the original B9 PWings mod, mass calculates normally, no matter FAR installed or not. Thanks for advices.

In my case KER show same as right click menu. What is most important, the CoM position calculated wrong, accordingly FAR analysis, it seems, was totally wrong too. I have to test this... In flight, it seems(I not tested much), everything is fine, but without FAR analysis plane construction will be very hard. Hmmm... I thought stock engineer reports has been relatively adequate in this case... I never noticed problems with stock wings before...

Hello everyone! I encountered a strange problem with FAR and B9 procedural wings. When installed separately, these mods work just fine, but together they give a problem with a mass of procedural wings and, as result, CoM position. In the simple case, the mass of the Pwings doubles(stock wings work normally), but if a lot of wings, in more complex craft and if used mass/strenght tweaks, Pwings masses can even become negative in some cases. All mods(except for KER) installed via CKAN on fresh KSP 1.0.5.1028 instance, created especially for test this issue. Mods: B9 Aerospace Procedural Parts - fork 2.1; Crossfed Enabler 3.3; FAR 15.5.4; ModularFlightIntegrator 1.1.2.0; Module Manager 2.6.18; Kerbal Engineer Redux 1.0.19.2. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-lHX_zOo86nbW13REZGdHlIZzg - Doubled mass. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-lHX_zOo86nZGJRcGlQNUlaSHc - Negative mass, but this screenshot from heavily modded version, where it was discovered... Please anyone help! I can`t play KSP without FAR and Pwings anymore! P.S. I`m sorry for the grammar mistakes, I used google translator...