CoreI

Members
  • Content count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

20 Excellent

About CoreI

  • Rank
    Bottle Rocketeer

Profile Information

  • Location Florida

Recent Profile Visitors

137 profile views
  1. Hello Apollo 13, and Soviet failures. So, hypothetical scenario: I buy DLC, install DLC. I continue existing Career game. Will parts randomly fail/malfunction? Just to be clear, I am in favor of this. I also think it could add more usability for engineers. Will the Making History Expansion add another game mode (ex: Sandbox, Science)? If so, will we be able to use these new parts in a Career game? Overall, I love the way the DLC and ksp as a whole is shaping up. I can't wait to participate in challenges using Mission Builder!
  2. Actually, asparagus staging was something that was planned to be implemented on the Falcon Heavy, but became too complicated. http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=33185 Of course, we are nowhere near ten-stage asparagus monsters, but the Falcon Heavy was close to using it. In fact, I remember reading that in later iterations of the Falcon Heavy in the future they may use asparagus.
  3. Be very, very careful when comparing the achievements of SpaceX and BO. Theoretically, BO landed and reused a used booster before SpaceX. However, you have to look at the booster and mission. New Shepard is a much smaller rocket than the Falcon 9. Also, it only went onto a suborbital trajectory. Not to hate on BO, but a suborbital return is like a bounce pass in basketball when compared to returning after delivering a payload into orbit. Also, one of the key factors in BO's ability to reuse New Shepard five times was that the heating from reentry was much less intense than what the Falcon 9 has to endure. With all the delays to Falcon Heavy, what are the odds that New Glenn launches first? (I know, close to zero. It's a joke)
  4. No!!!!! We are not worthy! That module looks Fantastic! I love the interesting twist with the built in RCS, but no reaction wheels. A lot more realistic. Judging by the last sentence, I think we can discern that in the expansion will be a new 1.875 meter stack. Also, I think we know know where the Rocket Part Art Overhaul went. It wasn't shelved, I'll bet it is the art used for the 1.875m stack. I do not look forward to changing all my rockets back to the old art so that there is no confusion. That took forever.
  5. I am still unsure if I shall buy the DLC or not. It will probably depend on the price. I can see and understand what SQUAD is doing. They are a company and need to make money. Completely understandable. However, (I can't name them off the top of my head) I know there are already mods for historical rocket parts, but I imagine a SQUAD-developed pack will be more balanced and less buggy. From the pages of this thread that I have read, there seems to be little anger, which is a good sign for SAUAD and the community. However, I would like to know if 1.3 is the last major version of the stock game, if 1.4, 1.5... etc. are only bug fixes, or if features will continue to be added to the stock game. Any word on a release timeframe?
  6. If I had to take a guess, I would say sometime around when devnotes come out on Friday (in terms of time of day. I know that the pre-release is today). I also wouldn't be surprised to see an announcement/early devnotes accompany the pre-release.
  7. You sir, are a genius! That's something I've never heard before. I may not be a programmer, but it doesn't sound too hard to implement in stock. On another note, the OP talks about semi-confirmed, confirmed, and might-be-resurrected features. However, since the pre-release is tomorrow, it would be logical for SQUAD to announce these not-quite-confirmed features before the players get their hands on them. So, I think I can conclude either A) We will see an announcement either later today or early tomorrow, or B) the pre-release is just localization, not 1.3.
  8. So, I've searched this thread for the answer to this, but haven't found a conclusive answer to my question. In the pre-release tomorrow (March 16), which I believe is for 1.2.9, what exactly is included? I'm interested in three things: Bug fixes (ex: Terrain/Runway Seams) Features (ex: Asteroid Day into Stock) Localization (Which I already know is included) Also, I've received some conflicting vibes about this one, but is this the 1.2.9 pre-release or the 1.3 pre-release?
  9. Well well. I think this is one of the first times the devnotes has actually used the term "1.3". I'm glad we won't be stuck in 1.2.x forever. Ok, so could someone make this a little clearer for me? I've never used the mod, but I get that it adds a bunch of contracts and requires you to put a satellite in x orbit with a telescope in order to see asteroids. So, is the inclusion of the mod in the base game just limited to the extra contracts + telescope, or will we be required to put a telescope in orbit x to have the ability to see and track asteroids?
  10. Sweet. I love seeing localization almost complete. Hopefully after this all development time will be spent on new features/bug squashing.
  11. Ooooo! A date! That's what I'm talking about! I'm sure the community as a whole is excited for the super-secret-project-that-was-originally-going-to-be-announced-six-months-ago. Better late than never I suppose. On the flip side, whatever happened to SQUAD's policy of soontm? I thought there was a taboo at HQ about dates. Now that I think about it, they never said what the subject of the announcement would be.
  12. Love the poem, and localization, but other than that, this KSP Weekly is skin and bones. I'm still holding out for some huge announcement in the next couple weeks though.
  13. yes Whoa. I had a working Mk2 SSTO (thanks to Scott Manley for the design) a few versions ago in an old save before the whiplash was moved further in the tech tree. It could just orbit and revondouz.
  14. Do you mean it has this amount left over once it's in orbit?
  15. What my personal strategy is this: 1. Once I have an intercept within 5km (which you have), I change the navball mode to "target" (click on "orbit"). I then time warp until I'm within five kilometers the target. 2. I point retrograde on the target-mode navball. Wherever you burn, it 'pushes' the retrograde marker away. So, position you ship so that it will 'push' the retrograde marker on top of the the. 3. As you glide closer, the retrograde marker will drift away from the. Just keep the retrograde marker centered by occasionally burning to push the retrograde marker. As you do this, you should be pointed roughly retrograde, so you should be slowing down as you burn to stay on course. 4. When you get within 100m, point directly retrograde and kill your velocity. Then move in using RCS for docking! PS: If you run out of velocity while approaching, enable RCS and tap the 'N' key a few times to gain speed. This saves you from having to turn around prograde then back.