mediobogdum

Sorry dude, wasn't obvious to me. Thanks again.

Sorry if I seem dense. Clarification?: Alcor has the berthing port because it was intended to dock with the lab which has a berthing port. The Orion will have the nasa/white dock hence the "swap"(when doing a return from lunar orbit). Are the black ports compatible with the whites? I assume they are not with the berthing ones. Thank you for your time.

Thanks so much for your hard work on this mod. The new docking ports are ok? I see the Alcor lunar return vehicle has a 'berth' port rather than the white NASA one. I ask because that berthing silver one had an issue seperating from the black docking port in the pre hotfix release. Thanks again.

Hello, thanks for this great mod. Aside from the hatch, has anyone been able to do a Mun mission w/ the Altair? Leaving the landing platform seems hit or miss, there isn't any RCS z axis translation; this is also tough with docking. I'm wondering are people adding RCS ports along the Z axis? Thanks again for your work and time.

Thank you for this very good mod. It is the backbone of my program. Are there any plans to release a Modular Fuel Tanks config for MRS? The additional functionality would be very useful. Thank you for your time.

Hello, thanks for this very useful mod. I would like to use this functionality w/ MRS tanks. Is it as straightforward as adding a config to the MFT folder? I peaked into some of the other config files and it appears you have to do an entry for each individual tank, is that correct? Thank you for your time.

Nice job keeping these parts useable, some of my favorites.

When I use the new biome for Duna that comes with the DL, will I still get the anomaly that's there?

Yeoman's work sir, thank you.

I see, thanks for answering. Any kind soul willing and able to throw them up somewhere, or it has to be him?

I cannot find your mod on Curse. The link only goes to the front page rather than the page with your download. I cannot find it with the search function. Sorry If I'm being dense, is it under a different name perhaps?

Are these different values from the eclss rebalancer that you posted in the eclss thread (which is awesome btw, saved my save game)?

Thank you so much for this. Yeoman's work truly.

When you say the "other tool" are you meaning MJ or the launch window planner? Assuming the latter: You do have enough info to use the planner. It requires only origin and destination for inputs. Once you have the resultant info create a manuever node faithful to those numbers. It seems from your post you are ok up till here. If your manuever node isn't exactly like the planner (ejection angle, speed etc) then you will get different results. Is this where you're having problems? Assuming yes: If your results DV and time-wise are wildly different from the math than the issue is execution. If you feel you are following the math exactly and are still not getting the correct trajectory after burn, then run two of them. Let MJ plot and burn one, then plot and burn one yourself (the exact one MJ just did) and see what comes of it. Something to keep in mind is the planner is a best case scenario. There may be many times when it's results are inconvenient, especially if LS is an issue. In this case you can experiment with different departure times and angles, none of which are likely to be more efficient (dv) but may be much faster; i.e rather than ninety days to Duna for 2500k, seventy days for 3500k.