FreeThinker

[1.2.2] KSP Interstellar Extended 1.12.12 (12-3-2017) Development

8366 posts in this topic

Version 1.12.13 for Kerbal Space Program 1.2.2

Released on 2017-03-22

  • Added Fluorite Mining, Scanning and Processing into Fluorine
  • Added Ability of Fuel Processing to use Enriched Uranium to replace Depleted Fuel or produce Fluorine when missing.
  • Added Attach Node to Laser Transmitter allowing it easy radially attachment
  • Fixed Vista compatibility with Near Future and Tweakscale
  • Balance: Replaced ISRU chemical LqdOxygen by Oxygen
  • Balance: Magnetic Confinement Reactor Lithium Blanket replaced by Lithium6
  • Balance: Reduced power output Fission Fragment Reactor power output by 25%
  • Balance: Reduced power output Tri Alpha power output by 25%
  • Balance: Increased high core temperature to Fission Fragment Reactor, allowing usage with Plasma Engine produce higher Isp

 

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/15/2017 at 6:10 AM, FreeThinker said:

This is what electric propulsion is for. You generate power somewhere on your ship, convert unto a universal medium that can be transported everywhere on your ship and use it a your location you desire. But this will of cource introduce large conversion losses. Usually the easiest way to achieve what you want is simply to add 2 radial thermal engines, not too far away from the reactor. In your case, near the belly.Ssimply radial attach any fuel tank and connect your thermal nozzle to it.

So what's the word on atmosphere breathing electric jet engines?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Energywelder said:

I'm hoping for some help with my power network. I've lofted 6 pebble bed reactors into space, megajoules says they're making ~2MW. But none of them seem to be able to connect eachother. I have the diode array on each sat, so they should be able to transmit, and on each sat I have 2 receivers (which I made sure were on) whose description says they should be able to receive any wavelength. 

 

Transmitter: Diode Laser Array (Beam Producer) set for long infrared

Receivers: Circular Thermophotovoltaic Receivers.

 

 

Could you make a screen dump with the transmitter and beam producer in view?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@FreeThinker since I updated to 1.12.12 I'm seeing a problem with stock radiator. I have a USI MKS reactor with stock radiators and the cooling works fine in the atmosphere (KSC Launchpad) but in space or landed on an airless moon the radiators don't seem to work and the reactor overheats. I see you made a change to FNRadiator.cs in 1.12.12 which isn't explained in the posted patch notes, but does seem to involve adding atmospheric details to radiators. Can you explain what this change does, and do you think it might be responsible for the symptoms I'm seeing?

Thanks.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rehpic said:

@FreeThinker since I updated to 1.12.12 I'm seeing a problem with stock radiator. I have a USI MKS reactor with stock radiators and the cooling works fine in the atmosphere (KSC Launchpad) but in space or landed on an airless moon the radiators don't seem to work and the reactor overheats. I see you made a change to FNRadiator.cs in 1.12.12 which isn't explained in the posted patch notes, but does seem to involve adding atmospheric details to radiators. Can you explain what this change does, and do you think it might be responsible for the symptoms I'm seeing?

Thanks.

 

Graphene radiators should work at 100% in space and at only 25%capacity in the atmosphere. If it doesn't it is a bug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, FreeThinker said:

Graphene radiators should work at 100% in space and at only 25%capacity in the atmosphere. If it doesn't it is a bug

I replaced the stock radiators with the Large Folding Graphene Radiators and they have the same problem. Reactor is cooled properly on the KSP launch pad, but overheats in orbit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FreeThinker said:

Could you make a screen dump with the transmitter and beam producer in view?

I sure would love to, but my browser isn't letting me paste pictures into the box, how do I do that first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rehpic said:

I replaced the stock radiators with the Large Folding Graphene Radiators and they have the same problem. Reactor is cooled properly on the KSP launch pad, but overheats in orbit.

Lol it is exactly the other way as it supposed to. Thanks now I know how to fix it

Edited by FreeThinker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, FreeThinker said:

Could you make a screen dump with the transmitter and beam producer in view?

I sure would love to, but for some reason I am unable to attach pictures to one of these posts, could you tell me how to do that first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Energywelder said:

I sure would love to, but for some reason I am unable to attach pictures to one of these posts, could you tell me how to do that first?

Load the pics on Imgur and share the links here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem is this, beam producer is this, but it doesn't seem to be producing any beam, I've tested several other receivers. Also, posting the link seems to be bugging the message box, so it's imgur.com/ and then a/PdiJl

@FreeThinker

@Nansuchao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/23/2017 at 0:48 AM, Jumberlack said:

So what's the word on atmosphere breathing electric jet engines?

I too am waiting for this.. I used to use ATILLA on atmospheric mode quite extensively, and that has been removed without a replacement :(  the thermal turbojets kind of work but they take a long time to cycle up/down which makes hovering an issue of chasing the throttle a LOT... in closed cycle mode they don't do this, which I suppose makes sense... but I'm also curious as to why in atmospheric mode they cycle DOWN more slowly than they cycle UP.  You'd think that closing the throttle would restrict airflow over the reactor and it wouldn't need to cycle down since without any intake airflow it doesn't matter how fast the N2 turbine (if it has one) is spinning since there's no input mass to eject, right?

 

So I suppose @FreeThinker I kind of combined two issues in that paragraph.. lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there any mods out there for metallic hydrogen that would work well with this? A huge problem for doing Interstellar trips in Kerbal is that you can't really make your ships big enough without a lot of staging. And that makes maneuvers into a real drag.

A metallic hydrogen to gas converter/reactor would significantly decrease the amount of storage volume needed and make maneuvers a lot nicer. You would have extra heat to deal with, and an additional energy source, but that's good news if you're powering say a habitat ring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any up to date tutorial regarding power networks? I think my previous attempt failed because the generator stopped to transmit whenever I switch away from it.

So I've built another and put it in orbit instead of the ground (with hyperedit, to test)

XjxwjP8.png

It has a fission reactor directly connected to the electric generator - and it is producing electrical power. Then a gyrotron is connected directly to the electric generator. Then the transceiver goes straight to the gyrotron, I click on "activate transmitter" and yet it remains as "input power offline"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ss8913 Yeah I mean I can think of two different ways to do it, one with a big electric motor powering a ducted fan like a high bypass turbofan, and one way with some sort of electric arc plasma ramjet for the high speed atmosphere runs. The former doesn't feel very interstellary but I can definitetely see the latter having a place in this mod. @FreeThinker if I made a model for something like this would you consider balancing and adding it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now