[1.1.x] Procedural Fairings - For Everything! v0.2.0 - July 4

[iDInkeD06]

Hi @Felger, I just want to know if this mod does have a new release planned to bring 1.1 compatibility ?

Edited April 27, 2016 by iDInkeD06

[NathanKell]

v0.2.0 for KSP 1.x and 1.1.x.

• Sound patch and don't-create-unloadable-parts patch by khr15714n
• Saturn-Nova stringers texture and the inclusion of working normal maps generally by ferram4
• Repackaged without bundled dependencies--get them separately! Oh and we have a readme now.

https://github.com/KSP-RO/ProceduralFairings-ForEverything/releases/tag/v0.2.0

[Gordon Dry]

Is it correct that
GameData\ProceduralFairings-ForEverything\MeshAndDefaultTextures\fairing1.tga
GameData\ProceduralFairings-ForEverything\MeshAndDefaultTextures\fairing1_bump_NRM.tga

are 48 bytes and seem to be empty?

There a a few "transparent" textures in game, I'm missing the black variant.

[Phineas Freak]

@Gordon Dryyes, this is normal and the textures are required for the correct "operation" of the mod.

[Technotron]

I have a weird thing, when in play with Realism Overhaul and RSS career the fairings and stuff are researched all ready even though they a researched later in the tech tree. I am using community tech tree

[NathanKell]

All fairing sides should be available at start with RP-0. If you're playing RO career without RP-0, you have worse problems.

[DJ Reonic]

Would there be a possibility of getting support for Bluedog Design Bureau?

[Tossy64]

Installing this mod unfortunately takes away ability to use the MainSailor fairings textures. The relevant fairing wall parts remain, but the actual texture is impossible to use or select. Known issue??

(Also noticing that some textures, like default, are extremely transparent compared to the more "designer" textures)

[Eugene Moreau]

Any possibility of this mod being updated for 1.2.x?

[sebi.zzr]

3 minutes ago, Eugene Moreau said:

Any possibility of this mod being updated for 1.2.x?

This are only MM patches and textures and it works perfectly fine in 1.2.2.

[Eugene Moreau]

20 minutes ago, sebi.zzr said:

This are only MM patches and textures and it works perfectly fine in 1.2.2.

Excellent!  Thank you.

[evileye.x]

On 26.06.2015 at 6:09 AM, Felger said:

Procedural Fairings cannot place the "top" node below the fairing start point. KW Expanded Fairings place the payload above the structure. Use the stock offset tool to place the payload onto the structure.

I just tried and said above is not true anymore

@PART[KW2mFairingPFE]:FINAL
{
	@description ^= :$: [KW-x-patched] :
	
    @MODULE[ProceduralFairingBase]
    {
        %autoStrutSides = false
    }
	
	%node_stack_top = 0.0, -0.13, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0

}

This one works, placing node approximately it should be. Just tested with 1 simple mk1 - FLT800 - LV 909 - decoupler stage.

Fairings side generated correctly

Edited July 14, 2017 by evileye.x

[Murdabenne]

@evileye.x check the date of Felgers post 

[evileye.x]

7 hours ago, Murdabenne said:

@evileye.x check the date of Felgers post 

Yes, for 2 years this phrase stopped everyone wanted to fix KW expanded fairing bases  . Joking. Fixed my post by the way...

Just wanted to share, because I love KW faring bases...

Also, I have noticed some of fairing sides have alpha channel enabled. This plus invisibility module makes them really hard to see in VAB. Also, I like to admire my rockets in VAB and want to see fairing as well. I fixed alpha channel and saved textures to DXT1 format, but not sure it is legit to share...

Edited July 14, 2017 by evileye.x

[Murdabenne]

Truth be told, I like the KW stuff myself, including the fairings. As for sharing a fix - unless the license restricts it, I think its fair use to release a fix or additional functionality part.