Jump to content

Pale Red *Dots* ESO | Proxima b confirmed UPDATE 2017 PaleRedDots!!


Spaceception

Recommended Posts

 

It's all about generating money. I bet many have bought the "Spiegel" just because of this and on Facebook millions of clicks where collected and with those customized ads transported to the clickers.

And in the end nothing has been found or it is so unclear that speculation just continues, regardless whether or not there is a rocky planet in the assumaed zone where liquid water could eventually exist.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576515301247

The "media-maelstrom" .... :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Spaceception said:

Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love ya, tomorrow
You're only a day away!

http://www.universetoday.com/130419/eso-announcement-address-reports-proxima-centauri-exoplanet/#

Hopefully we are going to hear more than: "Uh, yes - we've found something. It looks like a planet, but we're not 100% sure. We need more time for observations. Thank you." :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scotius said:

Hopefully we are going to hear more than: "Uh, yes - we've found something. It looks like a planet, but we're not 100% sure. We need more time for observations. Thank you." :)

Uh, we're going to hear that, with percentage-chance calculations of how certain they are and maybe a few of the characteristics. They need peer review before they can completely confirm it, but now that they've seen something they can swing Hubble around and glare at Proxima until the little dwarf coughs up its secrets like Jeb beating the crap out of a booster-pinata.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1629/

Here it is.

Now, while the girls squeal, let's analyze what they have.

While having an evening beer :-)

Edit: nothing against girls, gravity beware, just ... a, forget it.

2nd edit: Nature-Paper coming ...

3rd edit: "habitable zone" doesn't take radiation into account. The planet could be dry and without atmosphere because it's very close to the sun (X-ray, particles). I wait for the nature paper, the linked paper is not yet released.

 

Edited by Green Baron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This planet is orbiting too close to the star to have a sizeable moon. No moon to keep the inner core dynamo turning, means no magnetic field. No magnetic field means less protection from already increased amounts of radiation coming from the star. I don't have much hope for Proxima b to be anything more than a sterile barren desert. Maybe, if there are sizeable bodies of water life appeared under the surface, where radiation is not a threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2016 at 3:07 PM, CptRichardson said:

Uh, we're going to hear that, with percentage-chance calculations of how certain they are and maybe a few of the characteristics. They need peer review before they can completely confirm it, but now that they've seen something they can swing Hubble around and glare at Proxima until the little dwarf coughs up its secrets like Jeb beating the crap out of a booster-pinata.

Not a chance, Hubble's angular resolution is far too low to see the planet as separate from Proxima.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be either totally locked or in 3:2 resonance (like Mercury). If it's tidally locked modeling suggests you'll only get liquid water in the area ner the centre of the light side, so dark side conditions aren't really relevant for questions of habitability. For the 3:2 resonance, liquid water is possible within a narrow tropical belt. Assuming enough water is present that is, formation modeling gives vague enough results that it could be bone-dry.

Edited by Kryten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scotius said:

This planet is orbiting too close to the star to have a sizeable moon. No moon to keep the inner core dynamo turning, means no magnetic field. No magnetic field means less protection from already increased amounts of radiation coming from the star. I don't have much hope for Proxima b to be anything more than a sterile barren desert. Maybe, if there are sizeable bodies of water life appeared under the surface, where radiation is not a threat.

Tidal forces aren't the main thing responsible for keeping the inside of a larger planet liquid. That's almost entirely down to primordial heat and radioactive decay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_internal_heat_budget

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peadar1987 said:

Tidal forces aren't the main thing responsible for keeping the inside of a larger planet liquid. That's almost entirely down to primordial heat and radioactive decay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_internal_heat_budget

In the case of planets, yes. Gas Giant moons, however... Well, how else do you think Europa is warm enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kurja said:

But it would also need to rotate..?

Maybe. Mercury has a very week magnetic field. Earths magnetic field is s result of complex convection and differentiation, currents in the solid/ductile parts of core and mantel. It's yet not totally understood, and it changes, can even have mutliple poles.

Was a joke at university to blame the quadrupole for all kinds of mishaps ...

Edited by Green Baron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peadar1987 said:

Tidal forces aren't the main thing responsible for keeping the inside of a larger planet liquid. That's almost entirely down to primordial heat and radioactive decay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_internal_heat_budget

Even if planet is tidal locked its unlikely that its orbit is exact circular so it wobble a bit like moon does. This has the benefit of even out sunlight a bit as the sun moves forward and back on the sky. it will also make the dark area smaller. 
Another planet in orbit might also cause tides, not sure if it could be close enough to cause an effect like on Jupiter's moons, it can not bee to large or we would spot it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...