Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

Now that's how to start a Monday!

(I work an 8-to-5 so that's where I am with days like this...)

Gotta conserve likes, for sure.

You might be a nerd if your biggest thrill of the day was that SpaceX provided telemetry for the first stage recovery!

Federstein keeps tripping over his words this morning, but not so badly as yesterday.

Anyone know if they are attempting fairing recovery?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sevenperforce said:

Why did he say it is "12 meters in diameter"? It's 3.66 meters wide. Maybe he meant 12 feet? Or maybe he meant that the TEL assembly is 12 meters in order to support Falcon Heavy....

I thought I heard feet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sevenperforce said:

Why did he say it is "12 meters in diameter"? It's 3.66 meters wide. Maybe he meant 12 feet? Or maybe he meant that the TEL assembly is 12 meters in order to support Falcon Heavy....

It is 12 feet in diameter, so I think that's what he meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said:

It is 12 feet in diameter, so I think that's what he meant.

Yeah, he said "over 200 feet tall, 12 meters in diameter" so that's probably right.

Funny thing is, he made the same mistake yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheEpicSquared said:

Alright everyone, place your bets on whether Inmarsat and CRS-11 will launch on their advertised launch date, or be delayed... :D 

I say delayed. :) 

I'm going to be completely honest, I hope it will be delayed a few days. I am going on vacation to Florida sometime in early June, and an RTLS would be sooooo cool to see!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back and watching the launch, since I tuned in about a minute before MECO...

Was it just me, or did she feel pretty sluggish coming off the pad?

Checking...looks like 100 m/s at T+0:27 in this flight. Quickly compared to CRS-10 and it was identical. SES-10 reached 100 m/s about two seconds later, at T+0.29. Guess that's the difference between an LEO launch and a GTO launch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tail-first video of the entry burn confirms that the first stage central engine ignites first, followed by the other two stages engines.

Rewatching...from the ground, it appears that the bottom half of the rocket is already pretty sooty at the conclusion of the boostback burn. I didn't expect that.

Edited by sevenperforce
Wow, that was a dumb mistake.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...