Jump to content

What would you rate KSP?


Shadow Wolf56

Recommended Posts

5.6667

 

Kerbal: 2/10 (The game definitely has them, but it's too deep in the "LOLKerbalsIsDumb" crap.  Further, they don't really do anything.)

Space: 10/10 (Yes.  It has this.  Plenty of it in a way that works.)

Program: 5/10 (It's kind of there, but it's really lacking a coherent "program" aspect, rather than just "a series of things".)

Edited by razark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd give it a 10/10 if it didn't have these performance issues and some other issues like the joystick support etc. Talking about a pure stock game here. I feel the performance was better on 1.1 (especially some of the pre-release builds back then had me launching 800 part ships at almost real time) nowadays the performance is worse again for me.

So lets say a 8/10, with potential to become a 10/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know. I love the game, but there are too many things that should be dealbreakers: poor optimization which loads all textures in system ram, the lack of proper planning tools like KAC, Astrogator or KER, the outdated graphics (which, to add insult to injury, are a resource hog). A finished game should work out of the box, and you can't send a fleet to Jool without mods (or you can, but you'll be relaying in external tools, too much eyeballing and replacing KAC with pen and paper)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easy 10/10 even with it's quirks and idiosyncrasies....which I consider part of the fun.  

Actually, 11/10 due to the awesome moders and community we have here....the amount of time I have spent 'tweaking' is incontheivable!  

every-time-i-hear-the-word-inconceivable

 

Edited by Red Stapler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall game concept - 10/10. Semi realistic space game with build your own spaceships and little green aliens to fly them. What's not to love.

Sandbox - 7.5/10. Great freeform game based on the above concept - win! Could really use some new sand for the box, the graphics look rather dated and some of the game mechanics still have a distinctly placeholder feel to them.

Structured gameplay. 4/10. Tries hard to be all things to all players and ends up being simplistic and bland. Only really saved by the excellent overall game concept.

Edited by KSK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea: 10/10

The looks: 5/10 (blame inconsistent KSC tiers and rocket parts)

The gameplay: 4/10 (would be higher but career mode and lack of basic info happened)

I shouldn't rate the way the game's development is handled, because I have never developed a game, but I will just say I wish they did some other things instead of doing what they are doing.

Overall: great concept but still isn't finished even though it has the "1.0" tag.

Edited by Veeltch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandbox: 8/10

Science mode: 6.5/10 science feels way too grindy with no sense of accomplishment. Needs meaningful experiments.

Career mode: negative10/10 way way way too poorly done. Illogical techtree progression, illogical contracts, absolutely no coherence to it with no incentive to play it after the novelty burns off.

Graphics: 5/10 once they implement porkjets unified beauty pass or do one of their own and bring the graphics out of 2012 to 2017 i will up to a 10/10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...