Skyler4856

For Questions That Don't Merit Their Own Thread

1219 posts in this topic

How would you accelerate a neutron? It has no charge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't. You use isotopes that eject Neutrons naturally.

Maybe you get the neutron to decay into a proton and an electron, and accelerate those particles instead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Free neutrons do decay pretty fast, but you would need them to be ejected at a pretty low energy.

At any rate, seems impractical. You would need a huge chunk of nuclear fuel for pretty negligible thrust.

Now, if you could work out how to get it to eject neutrons in one direction, you would have an awesome rocket, but I see no way of forcing this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there is this thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fission_sail

I think it is a good idea to pin this thread

Here is my question:

thranduil_by_andreevapolina-d5scl4f.jpg

What is the name of that huge thing that is stuck on its head? Is it possible to have that in real life?

Edited by Aghanim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Antlers. Male deers use them to fight each other to gain access to females.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even Musk can only colonize Mars if he finds people willing to buy tickets to colonize Mars. Which is already a stretch. Only millionaires will be able to afford a ticket, and millionaires don't typically become candidates for colonization.

And that is another stretch.

And well, a lunar lander is not the same as a Mars lander.

Why do you assume Musk is not footing the bill for the colonists he chooses from amongst volunteers? Again, at the estimated costs currently posted for the Falcon Heavy, he can personally out of pocket do something like 40-50 launches. That is assuming he doesn't get more money from his other business ventures or that like minded million/billionaires don't join up with the goal of establishing a colony. Musk has pretty repeatedly stated that he views his money as a means to an end, and that not spending it to achieve his goals makes it useless.

It really isn't much of a stretch. You bring up that a lunar lander is not the same as a Mars lander. This is true, but given that from what I've heard about Musks intended Mars lander, it should frankly be easier to land on the moon using the same lander. They intend for the on board rockets to do almost all of the heavy lifting when it comes to slowing down when it hits Mars atmo. Considering the speed the system will have upon engaging in a landing on Mars will be MUCH higher than the speed the same system would have for a Moon landing it seems likely that really the only major change the system would need is a different software profile for a lunar landing. They even lose some carried mass (or at least devote it to more useful means) on the lunar setup, because it won't be carrying the parachutes that the Mars variant is intended to have (which are to only be used in the event of a descent engine failure).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think the previous question was answered (sorry if its not!) so im going to ask a question ive got going around in my head.

asumming we got a working albecuire drive that bends space and all, its compressing the space in front/back of it, but then either we're creating more space, or space itself is being stretched from somwhere, presumably ahead of the compressed bit, so wouldnt our ship have to cross the "stretched" space too, basically negating the albecuire drives effect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it would not. Space is moving with the ship in the Alcubierre Drive system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are the Mercury and Gemini capsule skin panels beaded/corrugated? It is such a distinctive feature, yet it is hard to find definitive information about it.

Edited by Camacha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it had to do with the strength of the walls. Apollo used a more advanced structure later in the decade...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why are the Mercury and Gemini capsule skin panels beaded/corrugated? It is such a distinctive feature, yet it is hard to find definitive information about it.

Perhaps it may be for reasons of emitting heat from the capsule...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does rocket exhaust in space jet out?

Jetting out:

167832main_lcross_profile_hires.jpg

not jetting out:

2014-10-12-16_13_09-L2-Level_-Space-Launch-System-Update-Notes-And-Discussion-Sept-2014-onwards-350x227.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean if rocket exhaust in space is visible? Maybe inside the nozzle, like in the second picture, but I don't know about beyond that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was for heat radiation. Corrugated panels expose a larger surface.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was for heat radiation. Corrugated panels expose a larger surface.

However much of that surface is oriented towards other surfaces, which doesn't help, really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does rocket exhaust in space jet out?

In a vacuum, exhaust gasses expand more laterally, because there is no air pressure to keep them in a nice pointy shape. So that first picture (as well as KSP) is inaccurate. This is why upper stage nozzles are much longer than first stage ones.

MVac_Dragon_Cargo_640.jpg

Whether the plume is visible or not depends on the gas and the lighting. If light is not reflecting or shining through the particles, then it won't be very visible.

20120314-f1f9.jpg

Edited by Nibb31
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kerolox stages tend to have much more visible plumes at high altitude than hydrolox ones. Soyuz in particular is infamous for creating 'jellyfish' UFO sightings whenever it has upper stage flight over a populated area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would longterm exposure to an RTG do to ones health? Like using it for heat?

Like in The Martian?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What would longterm exposure to an RTG do to ones health? Like using it for heat?

Like in The Martian?

If weight isn't an issue, than you can easily shield the generator so that there is no noticable difference to the natural background radiation. At least on earth. The natrual radiation on mars should be more concernable than the RTG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pu238 is mostly an alpha emitter, none of that will get through the RTG shell. There is a little gamma, and the decay products may be more worrying in an older RTG. I'd have to look up the isotopes that occur to be sure.

Also, he is only close to it during sirius 4, 18 sols duration. The rest of the time, it's in its hole, in the hab but presumably.as far from his work area as possible, or in the trailer during the drive to the MAV.

All Mark has to worry about is a slightly higher cancer risk in later life, and the RTG isn't a huge part of that compared to the time on Mars and on the Hermes.

Edited by andrewas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a project of a militarized Soyuz known as Soyuz VI. It carried Pu-powered RTGs instead of solar panels, which saved weight, increased operational capability and reliability, and provided more power for the military equipment.

As you can see on this diagram, the RTGs were on the outside, on extended arms, and angled to minimize radiation on the crew module.

soyvi.jpg

The Soviets obviously thought that the risk of irradiating the crew justified the additional complexity that design, so I don't really think it is that benign.

Edited by Nibb31

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would cheese (or any other food) taste like after a month exposed to the vacuum of space? (if it wasn't irradiated)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, it would probably outgas, losing most of its water. It would probably freeze too, so it would end up tasting like dehydrated frozen cheese, whatever that tastes like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably like that powdered stuff in boxed mac'n'cheese. Nasty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now