Spartan_MiniMe

Fantastic mod, congrats on release! Another mod that would really work well with this is Planetside Exploration Technologies. Really looking forward to how far you three will take this!

Happy to hear that a mechjeb fix is being worked on. I think adding the radiator would probably be good, since it's built into the Orion SM anyways. Maybe add it into the textures to reflect this change as well?

Do you want bug reports(if any) in here or the dev thread?

Still need part testers? I'm always willing!

Great mod, but my only concern is if this is compatible with KSP 64K as of yet. I'd quite like to get back to the better Duna, but if it doesn't scale with the rest of the Kerbol System I'll hold off on installing it. Cheers

Tried this out. Initial results are promising. I'm seeing CPU Usage Hover at around 20%,, far below the previous 80-100% before EDIT: I am using KSP 1.1.3, Around 80 mods Installed

TFW I'm silly and can't find the button to rep this thread. 10/10 Benjee

Didn't mean to sound rude at all, I'm just cheerfully looking forward to release. My apologies if there was a misunderstanding.

As a great big fan of XCOM, I'd love to see this implemented. Sign me up as a test pilot

Download says today. Will it be released?

WOW!!! I have been waiting for a mod like this for so so long! Congratulations good sir!

Thanks for the post about DDS, it solved my problem after I converted everything in my GameData folder to DDS. Cheers:)

Has anyone else attempted a mission to these outer planets(specifically Sarnus) in the 6.4x rescale? I'm finding it to be a ridiculous challenge. Aside from gravity assists, which I'm having trouble with because my KSPTOT install is bugging out about a rescale and extra planets, I can't think of any way to complete the mission. I've got launch vehicles capable of direct injection, but I don't have enough delta-v to slow down. I know Cassini-Hyugens did an orbit insertion burn of 626 m/s, but this rescale, which is smaller than the actual solar system, is making me expend massive amounts of delta-v to enter orbit, even from an extremely high altitude, into a highly eccentric orbit, its anywhere from 1700-6000(most often closer to 6000) m/s. Ugh. Damn me and my love of realism mods.

My bad. I'll look through the rest of the thread next time:D

There appears to be a bug with the Fischer-Tropsch Processor. Whenever I attempt to attach it via either node, that node disappears, the part doesn't attach, and when I flip it around to attach via the other node, the same thing happens. Edit: I'm attempting to fix the problem in the .cfg file. Will let you know how it goes. Edit 2: Fixed the problem. There is a line in the .cfg file that should read +PART, but instead reads @PART. Just a simple typo. Fixed Config

We are not disputing that the first stage crashed, minutes after separating from the main craft, mind you. We are talking about the technical classification of whether or not a mission was a success or failure. The distinct guidelines that have been set forth by space flight organizations, public and private, is that if the payload is placed successfully in the desired orbit, the mission is a success.

Thanks for sharing that:D more knowledge is better knowledge

Thats what I thought. In my own thread I proposed an improperly fitted fairing on Dragon. We won't know until we know I guess

That's irrelevant. The primary mission goal was achieved. All mission have primary and secondary goals. Conducting a powered landing of the first stage was one of the secondary goals of the mission. Not sure if there were any more, but primary was still achieved.

That's a good point. I'm glad someone actually replied to this thread. But still, a very sad day. It is always heartbreaking to see something that has had so much time effort and love put into it not perform well.

Hey all, was just watching the launch on my way home form my run. I'm honestly surprised that this happened. I don't like speculating, but in my opinion the failure might have been an improperly fitted fairing on the dragon capsule, as that's where the smoke plume originated from. Considering that with the fact that the rocket was under going peak dynamic pressure, i think this is a sound theory. I dont have a degree in physics or engineering, they generally don't hand those out to high schoolers, but based off of what i know i think this might be the case. Provided are my screenshots of the event. http://imgur.com/a/F7CEZ forgive my ignorance of inserting imgur albums

Glad to see this finally moved to releases. Good work to entire team behind this!

On average, how many iteration should the computation take? I've started optimizing my coast, but I'm at 150 iterations and counting.

As requested, screenie of my optimization menu

Update: I have tried to follow your instructions about multi flybys, to the letter, but I am continually met with discontent and failure. I would appreciate it if you were to put together more comprehensive tutorials regarding the features of your software. I am currently trying to create a Kerbin-Eve-Duna flyby, ending in a mapping satellite above Duna. My problem comes when attempting to input the departure burn information into MA. When I then create an event to coast to periapse at eve, I am simply met with the spacecraft's final parent body as the Sun. I believe that I don't understand the mission optimizer, which you reference as being THE tool to make sure that my burn creates a trajectory heading for Eve. Yet, when I attempt to optimize for central body, I am left with an orbit exactly the same as my initial orbit. I really want to use this tool to create awesome missions, but I feel that this is a far off goal without proper instructions