AndyMt

Members
  • Content Count

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

166 Excellent

3 Followers

About AndyMt

  • Rank
    Rocketry Enthusiast

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. @ildifa I remember that pull request, thanks a lot. When someday I find time to work on GT again I'll for sure integrate it.
  2. This is exactly the reason. GT looks for a specific partmodule and procedural fairings have a different/own one for that purpose. Of course this could be added, but well - right now spare time availability is against it . I personally use action groups to deploy fairings. While I like to use GT for the general launch profile, I still like to fiddle with some manual stuff during a launch.
  3. FAR support is not implemented and I don't know if I will add it some time. This results in the 2 issues you've mentioned above. You have to switch off fairing separation and do that manually. The stats are useless, which also means that the "improve guess" function probably won't find the ideal launch parameters. Sorry for that.
  4. Regarding the comments about RSS and RO: I think I have to cleary state in the opening post that GT does NOT really work with RO in particular. You can get it to work with RSS scale, but you would have to fiddle with the values manually and not use the "improve guess" function. But with RO it does not work because of not restartable engines or not throttable engines etc. So: GT is mainly intended to be used with stock scale. It might work with scaled up systems, but then you have to tweak the values manually. I often play in 2k or 3.2k and there I just reduce the angle value "a little" and increase the target height "a little, too".
  5. That's an excellent idea! That way one could deploy solar panels, antennas etc...
  6. It most likely is related to the filename. " characters are not allowed in filenames. As the filename is partially composed of the vessel name, this is the reason. Of course invalid characters should be removed/replaced so this cannot happen... I'll add this to the list: https://github.com/AndyMt/GravityTurn/issues/49
  7. Actually - for debugging purposes I've added this in kind of a hidden way: while keeping the "Alt" key pressed, click "Previous best settings" . This will reset to defaults and then you can press "First guess" which will end up with what you want :-). It also shows more information in the "Stats" window, most of which might be confusing... As I've stated before I want to redesign the whole UI, but I just don't find the time to do it... anyway - the "reset" button will be there... sometime...
  8. Yes 1.7.6 is the old Version. I've just released 1.7.7 yesterday, don't know if it's on CKAN already...
  9. Ok, then I'll make this an official release. Just have to figure out how to tell CKAN that it's not compatible with 1.3.1 or earlier any more.
  10. I found some additional time today :). So if someone wants to test: https://github.com/AndyMt/GravityTurn/releases/download/1.7.7/GravityTurn_1.7.7.zip It's a pre-release, just recompiled, no changes in functionality. And it won't show up in CKAN.
  11. Thx :). Today I took the effort to install Visual Studio on my new PC and got GT compiled. It seems to work, but I have to do some further testing and go through the whole release process again - of which I forgot most details... it's been a while. Maybe I'll get a release finished end of this week.
  12. Exactly - you can regain control by switching to map view and back as a workaround. Don't know if MechJeb integration works after that. Edit: actually it's by switching to the space center, then back to the vessel via the tracking station. This makes GT terminate and go away...
  13. Just tried the current version of GT in a fresh KSP 1.4 install: unfortunately it needs to be recompiled (at least). Not sure when I have time to look into this, because in the meantime I've changed PC and have to re-install everything... I would also have to merge my dev branch - or just do a new patch branch in GitHub. Anyway - probably a few hours of work. Not sure if it would be better to wait for 1.4.1.
  14. Yes, RO adds even more issues compared to RSS, like no throttling for most engines. That alone makes GT kind of unsuitable... I still have to try MJ's new way of doing launches :-).
  15. Just to add to that: the switch from Surface to Orbit marker in the navball is controlled by GT and so is the pitch to horizontal. It is controlled by the "Pressure Cut Off" parameter. The closer to 0 the higher up this happens. Personally I started to set it to 600 for Kerbin. For RSS size games I'd suggest to set it even higher, or to 0 all together. There is no hard-coded limit in GT in regards to pitch etc. The suggested parameters are all for stock only, they don't make sense for larger scale systems. I occasionally played RSS with GT myself, but it's been a while. What I remember for a 1.5 TWR vehicle is this: Increase the Start parameter to around 100 Turn Angle around 5 Time to AP, both to 60 Pressure Cutoff to 300 or even more towards 0 But as I said: it's been a while...