pTrevTrevs

My first time trying any kind of airliner-like craft. It's meant to be a tow plane for my Bristol Boxkite, I've given up on trying to make that a powered aircraft. Flies ok, climbing is really good, but only when the engines are at full power. Needs improvement on turning, it can't maintain speed for very long when it goes into a turn.

Wow, I'm a little late again, but that R-7 looks magnificent! The orange stripes look perfect on the rocket, and if you don't like them, you can always make an alternate texture. I think it would be cool to see a military green texture for R-7 ICBMs, and maybe that grey one you have for Sputnik/Vostok/Voskhod rockets. I haven't played KSP in earnest for a while now, but when this R-7 is released,I'm gonna have a KSP binge like you've never seen before! Well, maybe you have seen it before, I don't know how long other people play KSP at a time...

This needed saying. This really needed saying. Spelling error aside, they look pretty good, but was the Peacemaker in service in time for World War II?

If you're doing World War II bombers, you should do the A-20 Havoc, or maybe the Wellington. Maybe I'll try and make a bomber one of these days.

I think the second stage looks too wide compared to the first stage, but I don't really blame you that much, it's difficult to build a good Ares I, especially since the game lacks large SRBs

How exactly does it dive? I would love to incorporate that into my Typhoon submarine! Unless it requires some crazy number of parts, that Russian behemoth of mine is already well past 500.

What about Stonehenge? I've always wanted to see it, but a few complications have arisen by the fact that I live on a different continent than it.

Hmm, pretty good. I bet it would complement my own quite nicely. repped!

Hmm, I see, it looks better with the bottom tank and boosters.

I guess I'm a little late on mentioning this, but I'm pretty sure the bulge on the R-7 core isn't quite as pronounced as that. Have you modeled the parts on orthographics, or just scaled them as such?

3.125 is halfway between 3.75 and 2.5, so it makes more sense to use that size

Did it two weeks ago: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/129827-Kerbal-Cookie-Program-%28Download-available%29 I'll see about the donut, too.

Looking great, the only problem is the engines, and it isn't even your fault. Those new turbojet effects make it look like all it's engines are on fire and about to explode. Maybe Squad ought to do something about that. Good job on the plane though, you've done it justice.

Remember Kerbal Cookie Program? Well, people asked me to do more stupid stuff, so I did. Here it is. Bacon and Eggs I have for you today a skillet mounted over an Eco Friendly Turbo Cook Camping Oven Mk II, with two slices of bacon and a fried egg in it. I feel incredibly stupid right now, but I was asked to do this... Let's get this cookout started! Fire up the Camping Oven! Mmm, look at that sizzle! Smells like kerosene, that must mean we got the temperature right. I guess this giant snack showcase is going to become a weekly thing for me, so if you have a specific food you want to see built as a craft, PM me or leave a reply below. Like the Cookies, I won't post a DL unless someone asks for it. Let me know what you think of this... thing..., and be sure to leave some rep if you enjoyed! Enjoy your Sunday, it only comes once a week.

What if the top tank of the core stage was 1.25 meters, and the bottom tank was 0.9 meters, with 1.25 meter boosters? That way, there wouldn't be any new sizes introduced, and 0.9 meters will become a little more fleshed out.

Can we see some pics of the craft? There is a helpful turorial on how to upload and embed pictures here (http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/entries/1437-Embedding-Screenshots-in-your-Post%21) if you aren't sure how.

It does look very much like a Claymore: How the hell does it even reach orbit? I'd like to see a full mission album for this monster!

Can you try a Ferris Wheel?

Maybe Macey will respond to this amazing find. I hope he does, research should be rewarded,

Now you just need to add the turrets. There are quite a lot of them, but they help give the B-17 such a distinctive silloeutte. By by the way, how many crew does it hold? While I'm at it, some cell phones do allow you to use cellular data as a wifi network. It isn't very fast and is limited by how much data your plan allows you, but if you don't want to have to import photos or take pictures with your phone, it just might work...

VA works pretty well by itself as a three Kerbal capsule. Using the Tweakscale config, you can attach a Cygnus propulsion module and scale it up to 1.875m, it looks great! VA also has a 0.9 meter top, which is bigger than the Soyuz DM, so it's more versatile. EDIT: Here, look at this: http://i.imgur.com/HyHCYco.png

Darn, the parts I need fixed most urgently are the TKS parts, (used big crew can for Salyut M Munar station, shrank when I went back to space center to launch next module) but I'll wait for their turn. I've got lots to do in Space Engineers while I wait. Verdun too, if I can get it working properly. Can't wait for the new ATV, that stuff looks glorious!

http://www.americancivilwarstory.com/images/Uss_Cairo_h61568.jpg I sent this to my friend to try and explain what my new ship in Space Engineers looks like.

Was the part shrinking bug fixed in this version?

Hey, it's like I always say to myself when I try to justify doing something stupid, "Insanity is a virtue, not a detriment"