• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Vegatoxi

  1. Lie. They can tell you anything. It's just words. In fact KSP will be dead after KSP 2 release Nobody will spend money for older version of same product. Only way that can happen - KSP 2 will be complete buggy trash.
  2. So. NVIDIA announced DX12 Ultimate and a bunch of features which will(probably) significant improve the image and performance. Will KSP 1/2 have it or not?
  3. 1.Why 2. Why? 3.Mods are here for a reason 4. Why would you need that? 5. Probably 6. KSP has never been a game fit for weapons, make your own 7.Then go play Simpleplanes 8. Done 1. Cuz i dont want to start from scratch every day or week. 2. Cuz it's also part of exploration. 3. There is no such mods. At all 4. Quality of life thing 5. I need to be sure. 6. Times change™ 7. I dont want go to simpleplanes. Especially in case where even KSP have it with mods and it's much better than stock wings. 8. Ok.
  4. Yeah... whole 5 screens Thats exactly what we waiting for...
  5. Not literally dumb digging like an ASTRONEER But flaten surface for base or some archeology excavations
  6. Say it to ASTRONEER devs. I'm not asking about caves within every 100 meters. But at least few points of interest
  7. Like ASTRONEER Maybe not so dumb and unlimited but somehow And easily breakable by official patches. We'll see
  8. Constant living world with no time-to-time server resets/wipes/etc. I suppose there is no way to mod it Then why still no such mods for KSP? Like FAR i mean. Currently KSP AD way too far from reality
  9. And how much time is need to rewrite BD armory for KSP 2? Even KSP pathes ruin almost all mods and need to wait months untli they start working.
  10. 1. No presistent universe in MP = NO BUY! 2. No subterrain environment = NO BUY! 3. No realistic aerodynamic = NO BUY! 4. No terrain modification = NO BUY! 5. No dedicated servers = NO BUY! 6. No native BD armory = NO BUY! 7. No procedural wings = NO BUY! 8. No clouds = NO BUY! To be continue...
  11. You have 2 same ideas with one of them better than other but spending resources for both in case that players obvious choose newest one and oldest one will be abandoned.
  12. Ofc. if they make KSP2 bad everyone stays in KSP IF!!! But anyway thats exactly what i'm talking about It's "loose - loose" situation. If KSP 2 will be good - everyone leaves KSP If KSP 2 will be bad - everyone stays KSP Both cases one of it is RIP
  13. I bought both DLC's for KSP But obvious after i buy KSP2 i dont care about KSP anymore besides the fact that i sponsored game which already dead.
  14. As i say before - they can easly get money by releasing DLC's and improving the game. But in face of KSP2 KSP have no sense Besides KSP2 developed by Star Theory. Not SQUAD
  15. Smart for business But bad to players
  16. New game vs game with already formed and known playerbase Also who say 15$? Why not 30$? And you can make new DLC's every year or even every half year.
  17. But can fund the entier new game? Logic...
  18. And can you explain why devs strat another same game with just few improvements if they already have great game? Why not just add these improvements to it? Even as DLC.
  19. Think. You have 2 almost same games with 1 of it having more and newest features. Simple choice.
  20. 2 companies of 1 publisher Develop 2 almost same games at the same time Simple math.
  21. Games is not an OS or cars.