Funguspower

I nominate Vaos3712 as best artistic channel! Honestly, how he is not on this list is BEYOND me. His designs are incredible, he does fantastic instructional video's, and makes things I don't usually see in other channels. It's one of the very few KSP youtubers I've seen that is capable of being truly creative, without abusing game mechanics or mods, and achieving the same if not BETTER results than most other people. Just because of DUNA ONE alone he should be at the top of this list... He can be a bit dry, but by God he's the best one out there. Get him on this list because he deserves it, and then some! Link to his channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCykjfgzqTHuYIhvUGz1Xezg And for best artistic video, I nominate Vaos' movie "Duna One" which he is still working on. But even the first part is worth a spot on here. Link to video: Regards, Funguspower

Yeah, it appears it's now impossible to use one 2000 degrees heat resistance part, because it explodes much sooner than the other 2000 degrees heat resistance parts. /logic. regards, Fungus

Possibly, Radam, but it heats up so much faster than the rest that something seems wrong. Also, a large part of the adapter is covered up by the nosecone. That should be heating up most in this case. Especially at supersonic speeds. The cockpit right behind it has an even bigger surface area and doesn't overheat until much later. Thanks for the idea, though. Regards, Fungus

Hi guys! After some fiddling about with the new parts and flight model, aswell as the new heat mechanics, it seems to me that the NCS Adapter absorbs WAY more heat than all the other parts. I've attached an image to show the insane difference in heat buildup between two frontally mounted parts (in this case a nosecone and the NCS adapter behind it). You can see the nosecone sitting at around 400 Kelcius (funny joke!) and the NCS adapter at 1100. A second later the NCS adapter explodes while all the parts around it are completely fine in terms of heat. Even if my design is aerodynamically poor (which I don't think it is, but who am I to judge...) it still wouldn't explain the huge difference in heat between the two most frontally mounted parts on the airplane. Anybody else who noticed this? Regards, Funguspower