Jump to content

Alexoff

Members
  • Posts

    1,397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alexoff

  1. If the fans of the game are the main communication problem, then the community managers are doing something wrong.
  2. The community will react in much the same way as usual. How did we react to the screenshots (!!!) of the multiplayer? Or a screenshot of a rocket in an incorrectly made plasma? Or the words about the colonies (when was the last time we SAW something related to the colonies?)?
  3. And it seems very strange to me to show quite simple separate part for rockets three months after the release of "a game without new features". In the fall of 2020, I became suspicious when we were shown the creation of kerbals, although the game was then at the stage of "polishing". Why not show: - a short video with the collection of science - a short video with the construction of the space center as we move forward in our career - a short video with a small colony on Minmus - a short video with the colony editor - a short video with the editor of huge spaceships being built right in orbit - a short clip with a craft descending from orbit in a plasma cloud - a short video with multiplayer (which Nate and his friends actively played in 2019), not a screenshot - a short video with the extraction of resources (solid hydrogen from Jool for example) - a short video with a Kerbal walking on unknown planet under unknown star - a short video with fully functioning buildings of the space center It just seems that the developers are exclusively engaged in the core of the game, a remaster of early versions of KSP1. To find out that some new features even in work, we have to take the word of the developers. They seem not going to show us something worthwhile.
  4. I hope this does not mean about the next 20-30 months
  5. What about modding? It's been a few months now with no news.
  6. I imagine the announcement of the announcement of the release date of science. And we will be solemnly informed that science will appear in 2024... ...
  7. Perhaps someday we will find out which bugs were the most vital to fix.
  8. What else do you know about me? No, but I know a lot of people who do everything at the last moment and for whom "next week" means Friday.
  9. Nobody promised new parts in the patch, there were no new parts in previous patches either.
  10. Remember guys - the entire squad team completed support for KSP1 to help Nate's team with KSP2. Imagine what would have happened to KSP2 without their help! But then we would get more patches for KSP1. Actually, yes. Of course, I can consider myself immortal, because so far I have been quite successful in it, but something tells me that I have a deadline. Like all people.
  11. Looks: Regardless, we’re feeling good about our progress in all areas and are confident that the next update will provide good performance, stability, and gameplay improvements. No parts in this patch
  12. Why are the hills far beyond the terminator line so illuminated? They don't get light.
  13. If "next week" means "Friday", does "June" mean "June 30th"? Do I understand correctly that nothing new will be added to the game in the patch? There was a feeling that if the news about the patch talks about the effect of heating or the reflection of light from objects, then this will appear in the patch. But now it is clear that if this is not said, then this will not happen. If you look at the news on previous patches, then ...
  14. What parts? If we are talking about parts from the DLC, then they will most likely also be released in a paid DLC.
  15. Here it is - the main event of May! Announcement of the release date of the patch, which will fix a few hundred more small bugs and increase performance by 10%!
  16. Well, maybe adding some new planets will be game changer. First new planets since 2013!
  17. It is quite interesting that "next week" always means "on Friday". But the week starts on Monday...
  18. I hope that the most terrible bugs started to be fixed somewhere in February and by now there should already be an understanding of what and how to fix without breaking the rest of the game
  19. Nate said that this week he would announce a new patch. It seems to me that this is not such a difficult activity to announce the next fixes. This is not a science that should come out in a relatively complete form. Nobody told us the size of the patch and the list of fixes, that is, the patch can be released as it is.
  20. As far as I remember, today the developers should announce the release date of the patch. It seems to me that this is not a very significant event. If the developers cannot even formulate a release date for the patch, then it will be just some kind of shame. I don't think they've reached that level yet.
  21. This is some kind of empty demagogy, this will not impress me. [snip] I will add - I heard about anything - about vaccinations, ISIS, 5G, cryptocurrencies, reptilians, microchipping and anything except KSP2. It's unbelievable that this works on the internet!
  22. Science is also not a vital element. In fact, it introduces restrictions on the use of parts, forcing you to go from the smallest and weakest to the most powerful and effective parts. You can simply create such restrictions in your imagination, for example, until you reach Dune, do not use parts larger than 1.5 m, nuclear engines only after Moho's visit, and so on.
  23. Every pandemic ends after a few years. Especially if it is overshadowed by more formidable events. But this is generally offtopic. I suggested looking at the specific facts of the development of KSP2. I thought you would operate with some facts, but it turned out it was just a prediction of Nostradamus
×
×
  • Create New...