Jump to content

322997am

Members
  • Posts

    718
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 322997am

  1. This challenge actually has two parts. Part one consists of making and posting a design of a plane that is very difficult to fly. The second part is flying a plane that another user created.

    The rules are rather simple. For part 1.

    1. The plane has to actually be a plane, and possess the ability to potentially fly. It does not have to(and shouldn't) fly well, but it should be able to.
    2. Stick to stock parts
    3. Maybe explain in your comment why the plane may be difficult to fly

    For part 2.

    1. Provide proof
    2. Explain what you did during the flight\

    That's really it. Post designs and flights below

  2. 21 hours ago, Hunony said:

    i updated from 1.3.1 to 1.4.2 and just saw a lot of things got better, perfomance, game loads faster, the only problem is the damn landing legs that explode everytime i hope squad fix the landing legs bug in next update

    I play both versions because all my stuff is in 1.3.1 but i checked out 1.4. It loads faster not because it loads faster, but because everyone(including me) deleted their mods. which I have around 50 of.

  3. Just now, invision said:

    right yet i can run and play any other game with zero issues.

    i know its hard for people to accept KSP runs like crap

    It doesnt run like crap, its just that it runs like crap on YOUR pc. I dont really know the source of the issue, but i get better performance on a gt 730 and a 4 year old i5.

  4. On 2/8/2018 at 4:44 PM, invision said:

    no there is not

    simply hanging out on the surface of the moon shouldnt run the game at 20 fps

    going to space center and then reloading the same ship now the game runs at 100 fps

    there is nothing to calculate except bad coding.

     

    sorry for saying this, but your drivers are crap. i run this game better on an i5 from 4 years ago better than that

  5. 18 hours ago, Just Jim said:

    Oh, I'm sure he's got much better stuff to read... :rolleyes:  But yeah, it would be really great to have the opinion from someone that's actually been there!!!  

    well, if elon musk plays kerbal, then scott kelly might go on the forums

  6. On 10/30/2017 at 2:32 PM, regex said:

    Because new sales of the game have likely dried up. This is supported in part by the anger over the console version as well as the move to create a new DLC. The console release was an absolute mess from what I've seen and that sort of bad will is very hard to recover from.

    E: Bottom line: If you can make more potential money from a DLC than continuing to update only the base game, then you do that, especially now that your game is "in production". Everyone who was interested enough in KSP to buy it probably already has and, while you may see new players appear, that number of new arrivals is going to diminish over time. Better to monetize the playerbase you already have with DLC or other merch.

    true, but here goes the game off of many people's computers. Nobody wants this game to become sid meiers civilization, but im afraid 2k will clamp down on the modding community to push DLC. Pretty much that is what they did with gta. considering 2k is in some cases worse than EA, I wouldnt hope for development continuing after 1.4

×
×
  • Create New...