Jump to content

MajorLeaugeRocketScience

Members
  • Posts

    628
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MajorLeaugeRocketScience

  1. Any chance we could at some point get an A-10 to launch it to orbit? Or maybe wings and a cockpit to make an A-9? This is by far the best KSP V-2 I've ever seen
  2. It’s really hard to place them at the same height, if it’s even slightly off a sharp bump will rip up a plane
  3. I had no idea these sites existed. Thanks though
  4. Is it just me, or is the KSP website down? I went to check and my browser says the site is down, while every other site I go on is working
  5. Sounds good to me. This is one of the mods I keep coming back to, and new content is always another reason to jump back in. For Boca Chica, are you talking about the linked KK mod by @Omega482? Or is there something else I didn't see? I love these KK mods, mainly because building my own KSC is really fun
  6. Any planned release date? Or do you want to just wait and finish some more models then release a huge pack at once, which would still be cool
  7. Quick request, mainly because i love your art style and want to see it on other rockets. Could you maybe do an Angara/Soyuz 5 and some of the Long March series when you finish the SpaceX IVAs? As much as i love SpaceX, i think you've hit just about everything by now and there is no such thing as too many rockets
  8. I'm sure someone has recently asked this, but any ipdates planned soon for 1.3? Does this still work correctly with 1.3?
  9. Sorry, haven't been active the pst few days. I'll do this sometime tomorrow. Probably going to launch some kind of Docking mechanism that docks to the asteroid
  10. Hey, it's been a second! @Kartoffelkuchen, I know about all the issues with the ULA pack, but in the meantime, is there anyway you could redo the old Minotaur IV/V and the other rockets for 1.3? I really don't want to be attacking you with questions but I want to see this mod continue on
  11. Turn Complete! https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9rESWVVK3sbRlMyZmRCSWF4RnM I added a large fuel module with just LF, designed for nuclear tugs. It has 2 medium and two large ports at the back. I would suggest another node be launched soon, there isn't too many left (only 2 or 3)
  12. I'd like to enter into this. Give me an hour and some space tape and you'll have another competitor
  13. *facepalm* I'll do this sometime tomorrow, if I did it tonight it would look terrible because I'm so tired. I noticed that it had a 3 in it, but since I no nothing about how games and files work I ignored it. Oh well lesson learned Edit: Just finished docking the KSS Nuclear Tug Fuel Module. Save file will be uploaded sometime later today, I had to leave my house for a few hours
  14. Ok after a whole lot of attempts I am still getting the message that the save/persistent is not compatible with this version of KSP. To be sure I also checked on 1.2, and it still didn't work. Someone who is better at the computer tech side of KSP have any ideas?
  15. Just to make sure I'm doing this correctly and I'm not just forgetting how to change the savefiles out (last time I did was around 0.19), I just delete the persistent.sfs in any given save and put in the new one, right?
  16. Uhh... Save file is not compatible with this version of KSP? I'm using 1.3, are you using the same @ZooNamedGames?
  17. Alright! Module will be launched tonight, file either uploaded today or tomorrow. Probably going to launch some form of large vehicle adapter, maybe so we could build a Community Transfer Vehicle at the station! Edit: Actually I'm going to launch a "Nuclear Service Module" filled with LF and some nuke looking stuff
  18. Yep! I'm launching a fuel module adapter so we can have large fuel tanks on the station. (That's the plan at least) It should be a structural module, with at least 3 large docking ports
  19. Also, I noticed Nevada was the launch site. Wouldn't an equatorial launch require overflight of major cities, as well as a polar launch (north and south)?
  20. Shhh..... "I'm sure the government would buy it."
  21. One of the main reasons I love Titan III and Angara was the insane amount of flexibility they had need a launcher with 2 tons capacity? Need 70 tons next week? Done! Seriously, flexibility is a great idea for a launch vehicle. No matter the capacity, a flexible LV based off smaller, proven models will be more cost effective and reliable than a purpose built model due to mass production and whatever laws govern wayward explorers. How else would Titan have survived 50 years?
  22. Yeah but why not use existing infrastructure as a more cost effective back-up? Soyuz-5/Feniks is just a backup but would work amazingly
×
×
  • Create New...