• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

25 Excellent

About atomontage

  • Rank
    Rocketry Enthusiast

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yeah thanks for pointing that out! I've read your comment here and I'm still thinking whether this is the right solution (for me). You see, if RT gets disabled then I have to get back to using CommNet. And that means that satellites become dead. I don't want to play without connectivity. One of possible solutions is to remove the DLL, play without connectivity for a while until fix is out, then install RT again. Thanks anyways, good idea!
  2. I can confirm this. After having like 5 fps on my base and removing the RT mod, it became 10fps+ RT spams a lot of these: Mods installed: It seems I'll have to completely remove the mod (although I was playing with it for years). I mean come on, double FPS boost is probably worth it. *sigh* goodbye, satellites, rovers, landers and other unmanned guys! *makes a save* Oh and.. playing with: RemoteTech 1.9.3 on KSP 1.7.3 and latest Galileo's Planet Pack (might have an issue with this) Anyways this mod is damn great!
  3. So I was arguing with this guy... telling him something trying to explain things. And then he suddenly typed. All in caps: KSP TWPO WUIT?! (Translated from Russian, orthographically correct.) As an admin of a big Russian fan community, I think I speak for every Russian KSP fan: WAIT REALLY?! FREAKING YES!!! KERBAL SPACE PROGRAM TWO! Oh my gawd... Pinch me coz I'm definitely sleeping! No really, I had this exact feeling: I'm definitely sleeping. Can't be. Omg. Then an avalanche of emotions fell through, described mostly in beautiful Russian obscene language I can't post here. You got me. Colonies. INTERSTELLAR FLIGHT... Parts-rich spacecraft... Omg. Thank you guys. YOU MADE MY DAY. And week. And more. Live long and prosper! And HUGE thanks to Squad for the original game!
  4. Thank you both @Padishar for creating and @linuxgurugamer for maintaining this awesome creation! A long time ago I was keeping it installed but I had a very old comp with 8 gigs of RAM. Never had any significant performance boost but meh my comp was really old (DDR 2, Xeon 5460 (quad core generation)) so I never expected much from both KSP and MemGraph. Now I have new hardware and so I gave it a try again. After a few attempts, I have finally set it up: with heap padding of 8192* it greatly boosts KSP performance by minimizing GC stuttering. Before it literally happened every few seconds for, well, a few seconds. Like I got a 5sec freeze every 5sec. Now it only happens every 30 or 60 seconds. So now my setup with over 100 mods and a huge base is much more playable! Thank you guys. KSP Community is freaking awesome! * for 32 gigs onboard, a 16 gig heap setup crashes the game. Will experiment more. 12 could probably be ok.
  5. Jeez... NOW I am ashamed! Haha. Yeah right, I used diameter instead of radius... *sigh* Thank you much for your great answer and very quick reaction! Mr. Kraken, bless this dude and this mod for us please! Oh did you already do it? Okay then, but do it again please! For more reliability..
  6. Hello, @Shadowmage! Firstly, let me thank you for your great work on SSTU - I've been really enjoying the mod for a while, its a pure awesomeness. And all those PBR textures... jeez, its cool as hell! *drools* I have a question. Lets say I have a standard MFT-A 2.5m x2.0 lightweight tank filled with LH2: Then the volume of this tank is 5 * π * 2.5^2 ≈ 98.17 m^3 (Notice that the menu says its volume is 24.5 m^3 and its usable volume is 20,8 m^3.) Now as we have mass and volume we can calculate LH2 density: m / V = 1475kg / 98.17 m^3 ≈ 14.025 kg/m^3 Google says the density of Liquid Hydrogen is something around 70.8 kg/m^3 that is almost 5 times greater. If we consider the told volume (20.8 m^3) then the calculations are correct and the resulting density will be 70.91 kg/m^3. I have also looked into the CRP config - it defines LqdHydrogen density as density = 0.00007085000 which seems to be correct. Does SSTU divide the resulting volume by 5 just to match stock LF and LOX? Because it fills itself with stock resources correctly. But it seems like a strange solution as it completely breaks the usage of LH2 and other resources. My SSTU version is 0.39.149 (KSP is 1.3.1). Thanks!
  7. Windows restricts usage of quotation marks in filenames so yes KSP can't create a craft file with it. You also cannot name your craft 'con' (without apostrophes) as Windows forbids to use that word as a file or directory name. About launch failures.. I think its normal. Its like you've just started your rocket career - its obvious your rockets will fail over and over again. Thats my opinion. I've had many failures too during early career stage. Also 25 reliability is very low (with default BARIS settings). My parts are mostly 80 and failures are now much less often. Even so something with reliability 60 does fail sometimes.
  8. Hello, Galileo!

    Firstly, let me thank you for your great work on GPP and other adjacent mods. They are great!

    Secondly, I have a question. In the GEA thread

    you asked the author to remove any of your textures from their pack. Did they? Im asking because we're about to ban this pack in our local KSP community as it violates many of the KSP community rules (as far as I believe).

    Thanks and have a nice day!

    1. Galileo


      I haven’t actually checked in a long time. Someone said he removed everything and that it doesn’t violate licenses anymore. If so, that’s great, but I can’t be bothered to download and install his pack and check. I have heard he just rips a bunch of textures from Space Engine now. But thanks for the kind words! Glad you like the mods!

  9. I believe its just a part of a name. But I'm not sure... No, its not a different mod. Its GPP that renames kerbals.
  10. Ok, I've found it under %APPDATA%. I've reuploaded it to Google Drive and the link remains the same. I believe it only remains them once. I didn't play it much though. The reason to rename is that it replaces Kerbin with Gael so it also renames kerbalnauts to Gaeleans instead of Kermans so it makes sense.
  11. I've just checked - yeah, output.log seems to be obsolete. I believe it persisted through the copying process. I have like 6 KSP installs. Two of them are for testing (like for this case when I needed pure stock). But still it is from the correct directory. It seems KSP didn't refresh it at all since the last.. crash I think? And ksp.log is ok. Is it enough for you? Or should I do something else to produce more logs?
  12. Um sure output.log: ksp.log:
  13. hello, @garwel! Firstly, thanks for the awesome mod! Now I have a bug here. It seems KerbalHealth is not fully compatible with Galileo's Planet Pack. The reason might be is that GPP renames kerbalnauts in such a way that their second name becomes Gaelean instead of Kerman. I tried KerbalHealth in a pure stock install (well ok, with KER installed) and reproduced the steps by adding another kerbalnaut into the vessel - everything seems to be ok. I get the following once I add more than one kerbalnaut into the ship in the VAB: (Notice that I also tested this on a pure stock vessel - Kerbal X.) It seems that the default kerbalnaut (the one that is always put into a fresh vessel loaded in VAB just like Jeb) does NOT cause the bug. In my case it's Galileo Gaelean (see screenshot above). Every other one does cause the bug. You'd probably also want a screenshot of my kerbalnauts (those are added by GPP by default): And just in case you're interested in mods I have installed then here is the list: Thats all. ps: oh and I have a quick question here. Is it compatible with other stars? For example, GPP adds one more star that is included in the star system - it has a very high orbit though. Its just like an another celestial body in the system but it is a star. Will it provide radiation once a vessel is close to it? Im asking this because its not a planet - I know ppl have already asked about adding radiation to gas giants for example. But what about a star? Also Kopernicus treats it like a proper star now. Solar panels work, heating works, sunflares work. Thank you and have a great day!
  14. I hope I didn't miss something essential in exploring the following issue as there's too much beer in me. Anyways. I wanted to add support for SSTU solar panels. As some of you may notice, its a popular mod. I use it too. So... after trying some configs inserted directly into \DangIt\ModuleManager\Entropy\Solar.cfg (I've simply replaced ModuleDeployableSolarPanel with SSTUSolarPanelDeployable for testing purposes), I got the following stuff: KSP.log: That one made me to look up the source. I'm not familiar with MM syntax neither with MM config files. But as far as I researched any module declared with MODULE { } inherits its parents' fields (as, for example, the ModuleDeployableSolarPanel.isTracking one). So isn't is safer to change the parametrization to return this.part.Modules.OfType<ModuleSolarReliability>().First().isTracking; ? PS: and as always.. Thank you @Ippo for DangIt! and @Coffeeman for Entropy and @linuxgurugamer for maintaining this mod! KSP really lacks of random failures. Not sure if it's nice to call all of you for thanks but oh well.
  15. @OHara thanks for your help. I've also tested a few parts - added my conclusion to the original post. Btw, in both cases of testing (Mk3 and Mk2 variants) cockpits were root parts.