superstrijder15

Would like to like this post, but well... You said it yourself

It would seem to me to be 'they agree', and the 'a' ending is in most verbs so far. This may be because there is no real system for deciding what the infinitive is, so I just pasted inflected stuff.

A new chapter!!! It has everything! Old Kerba, politics, Kerms and breaking the law! What is there not to love? Now lets get to digesting bel-oncordaan. EDIT: I got something in the dictionary, but the verb cor seems unknown until now...

Know your problems. My mun weird ISRU thing had it, but t doesn't seem like that big a problem for operations. The craft did shake a little though, did that happen with you too?

You got a lot of old ships, and a lot of weird mission ideas. I love it!

@0111narwhalz yeah, what i thought. basically -an is the english way of saying it(american, african, asian...) @KSK just took that over, while doing was probs inappropriate. Veiidan would mean excluding veiid, and anveiid would mean including veiid. Just like Kerman went away from the kerm, veiidan would be people emigrating from veiid. That's why I would take an alternative, which would be veiidol according to me, as when Kerman came, the rest of people called themselves Kermol. Although -olia means defender of(quick thought, veiidolia would be the veiid military!), -ol might mean something different. I've added it to the dictionary for now.

Ok, still reading your post, and it's great, but shouldn't it be veiidol: from veiid? like kermol from the kerm Edit: or anveiid, though that seems to me more like including veiid. like a sentence like the continent blabla has many areas, anveiid(including veiid)

Does anybody know anything in Old Kerba with a V in it? there is nothing in my database. I managed to translate all but veiid: Indeed the thing the second guy said sounds more logical.

It's okay not to give us chapters @TheEpicSquared. Good luck getting well again! Let's pray for your recovery by sacrificing someone to the Kraken!

Really nice new chapter! Great new mysteries await us... What would be the reason Jonbald hid the telemetry, for example?

I thought so too, so I made this document for what there is until now: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r0eDcf2dWf6_HwHZTgiDGwFXxOZ7Qxv-LyD2Jgpj8u0/edit BTW: Could everybody please just read this, It's the 4th or so time I put this in the thread, and soon I'll be banned for spamming!

I take that eb is the 3rd singular for to be, and an irregular verb? also, would minsatha-belda be an acceptable spelling, 'not accomplisher of the small deeds for them', and this language also allows the interpretation of 'accomplisher of big deeds for them' Or even because the preferred course of action was waiting/inaction Look at the link I sent, this is improving realtime(as I add stuff):https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r0eDcf2dWf6_HwHZTgiDGwFXxOZ7Qxv-LyD2Jgpj8u0/edit

This prompted me to make a document with al known Old Kerba, anyone interested look and comment here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r0eDcf2dWf6_HwHZTgiDGwFXxOZ7Qxv-LyD2Jgpj8u0/edit?usp=sharing It also ended with me searching for 'sath' which doesn't seem to exist yet, and with my knowledge of the fact that I'm not enough of a linguist to sort these words well I also noted that there are no We and You(plural) possibilities, bala would be perfect for we, but it's claimed already. The logic person in me is crying

What a great new chapter! Even better is that it is going to leave @KSK the choice to either end it quickly, with the seeds working well after freezing, or to do some more, with it not working (well (at this moment of research)) Of course I'd root for a slower conflict resolution

Well, in most stories Werhner is a genius designing most of the stuff, so that's might be what he is needed for. My main question is: Why don't they just strap these guys into a sounding rocket going to 71km and thus keep them 'intact' throughout the cycles?

It is mainly insane amounts of accretion, as well as the fact that I tend to play like on weekend then not for a week or month. So I will have to be able to choose the correct vehicle out of a list of 20+ different missions each having like 10 vehicles, after multiple months. If I were expecting to fly a whole mission in one weekend I'd not make such a long name. Also, once in orbit the Launcher bit should be removed, making it a lot shorter.

Does that mean I shouldn't ask @DarkOwl57 what P&F is?

That isn't a big problem for a range safety device I'd say: Why shoot a range safety at something 100km away? That is a safe range anyway

A brief breakdown: Minmus: destination ISRU: mission goal: landing a feasible ISRU/tanker to fill interplanetary missions Full: will mine and haul V3.2: third major overhaul, second saved small changes(the saves happen whenever I find this need to be tested by launching) W/ Launch: Has a launching booster attached 50+ Launcher rating of over 50 tons (costum built launcher capable of lifting at least a streamlined 50 tons payload to orbit according to mechjeb) V3: the third itteration of launchers Xtra struts: I added a bunch of struts

That is how my designs get named. One of my minmus miners ended up with design name Minmus ISRU Full V3.2 W/ Launch 50+ V3 Xtra strut. When I want more poetic names I tend to involve the purpose too, for example here are some blockade runner names: Defiance: defies the blockade Hammer: breaks through it Hermes: fast as the god of messengers Lightning: another play on the fast theme etc.

I know that problem. Luckily I also read a lot of books, which supply new names all the time. Also I use serial names a lot: Something 1, then 2, then 3, for good measure the one isettle with will be something 2B 29+ or something.

With me it's the other way around: the numbers are easier to hit accidentally/ hit the wrong one then to accidentally hit Alt+L followed by Space. Also I stack them so a single order is needed anyway, and I may eventually make a macro missile massacre with to many missiles for this. I didn't, problem found, thanks!

I'm trying to build a drone missile launcher for kerbal warfare, but without the possibilty to decouple docking ports with stages it's really hard/inconvenient to launch unguided missiles. Has the feature been removed? Did I do something wrong? And mainly, how can I get it to return? BTW, I'm running stock 1.2.2, fresh install

Love how noone went for efficiency on the first one!

I think it should be *types random letters until one name remains* @Aivoh