[[1.2 - 1.4] Elephant Engine, v0.2 (2016-05-06)]

what is this acid trip of a mod

[[1.3] KerBalloons v0.4.2 - Balloons for KSP!]

This is a pretty cool mod. I wanna do a Vega mission now with this. Would that be possible?

[Hab/Hub (and other strange things)]

5 hours ago, KSPUser777 said:

Yeah, I can't download these awesome looking parts. The links don't work. Can anyone help me with that?

Put media fire.com(remove the space) between www. and /download

[[1.2.1] Outer Planets Mod (2.1) - Active development has moved, see first post for new thread]

Anyone else getting this bug? Can it be fixed? Also I personally think the atmosphere of Thatmo would be more aesthetically pleasing if it were more purple or blue as opposed to red/orange.

[Frankly, I don't even *want* a v.1.2]

Main reason 1.1 took so long was optimization for the Console ports. That's really it. I mean Squad ported KSP into unity 4 in one minor update, 0.18.3/4.

[The Grand KSP 1.1 Discussion Thread]

Can't wait for the KSP store to crash. Just gotta watch it like a hawk and DL it ASAP before the server gets overloaded.

[[1.0.5 / 1.1] Grandma's original Kartoffelkuchen]

But I want Картошка

[Paler Blue Dot - A KSP Story]

I like how it's version 6.12 over 70 years later and Nova's parts are still in game.

[Older versions available on Steam and the KSP website]

On April 16, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Red Iron Crown said:

2. That "borderline illegal stuff" is copyright infringement and should not be mentioned on the forum again, per Rule 2.2f of our Community Guidelines.

It's only borderline illegal because Squad doesn't give us any other option. Not my fault I have to do that stuff to get my hands on something I technically deserve for paying for it.

[Older versions available on Steam and the KSP website]

I have a feeling that the only people that would use the older versions are the ones bright enough to understand that they'll be dealing with bugs but that there's always just newer versions without said bugs. Squad shouldn't have to add anything other than a possible readme that informs people that there will be no technical support for the version that they're using and that everything that happens is on their shoulders. I mean hell, I was just playing 0.17 yesterday and a kraken glitch corrupted one of my saves. I'm not mad. And I'm especially not going to whine to Squad and the moderators for support. Squad should allow people to own the old versions just so we have the option and don't have to do borderline illegal stuff to get our hands on it, if there's even the version we're looking for is floating around. Plus it shouldn't take much more than $100 at most for hosting, and Squad makes probably tens of thousands a week so that isn't even a nick in their budget.

[Paler Blue Dot - A KSP Story]

4 minutes ago, Kerbiter said:

The sites have basically went to no return, they're very different. And 4chan is 30% of the internet. Therefore senses of humor have upgraded 30%.

4chan is 30% of the internet? That would mean there's like 3 sites left.

[[1.1.2][1-1-2] May 13-2016 EnvironmentalVisualEnhancements]

14 minutes ago, Moose Rocket Science said:

hold up, are those the old parts from pre-0.16???????????

Pre 0.18, and yes. I get a nostalgiaboner from them. Just look up the Kerbal Historical Institute mod. It has all the old versions of parts that have been phased out.

[[1.1.2][1-1-2] May 13-2016 EnvironmentalVisualEnhancements]

With this installed, Eve has quite the eerie "atmosphere"

Ah? Ah? I'll see myself out.

[Paler Blue Dot - A KSP Story]

So let me get this straight

• Reddit, Twitter, Vine, and probably multiple other social media websites somehow still exist
• Everyone talks like they're on 4chan
• We still don't have an SSTO

What a dark future we're in for. All that aside, you still have a nice story you've got going. I have my own head canon of kerbals and humans meeting each other, but it doesn't involve us. It involves a game franchise's universe.

[[1.2-1.7] Blender (2.83+) .mu import/export addon]

Just wondering, does this support any .mu model, even those as old as 0.15 when they were first added?

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

1 hour ago, IgorZ said:

It would be a new mod then Though, if you have fun ideas for the fun stuff then it can be discussed and implemented.

Well obviously. I've always kinda wanted to make a life support mod considering none of them have a stock-alike feel, especially when it comes to parts. Problem is I have absolutely no idea on how to make plugins and my modeling is sub-par at best.

[[1.1.2][1-1-2] May 13-2016 EnvironmentalVisualEnhancements]

Call me an idiot for not knowing this already, but do I download both the main release and the config files? Or just the main release?

Nvm, my eyes decided to actually work and I saw on the github page that I need to download both.

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

1 minute ago, CobaltWolf said:

I approve of your choice in music.

I'm actually going to go make a drink right now.

Good.

Strelok Kerman appreciates you.

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

#HardLiquor4Lyfe

I have the pro props pod and modded mine so instead of the default whiskey, it is glorious vodka.

I also may have made the music for the ghetto blaster this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnTW6fZz-1E

[[1.1.2] Kerbal Inventory System (KIS) 1.2.12]

Would there be a way to merge the snacks with life support so eating said snacks would replenish their food/water? As of now it's only cosmetic but still fun to give my Kerbs a couple cans of soda and some snacks to munch on, as exploring space can make one quite hungry.

[We need Rotating Docking Ports in stock.]

8 hours ago, Xyphos said:

I just managed to dock the second part to a new orbit-built vessel, the part was Asymmetrical and a bit hard to maneuver.
but with patience and effort, I managed to get the ports aligned and then docked.
after docking, upon closer inspection, I noticed that the rotation was one or two degrees off,
and I could have sworn I aligned them almost perfectly prior to docking;
did the parts move upon after docking? I'm not sure, but HOLY MOLEY this is driving me BATTY.
I'm not about to undock and torture myself further, I wish docking ports could rotate by 5 degrees, like how gimbals can have 5 degrees of travel.
just right-click menu the docked port and click "Align" - shouldn't be too hard to implement.
...actually, that sounds like an idea for a Mod. if any code monkeys can manage it.

So pretty much your OCD is getting triggered and you want the devs to cater to it. How about no.

[Older versions available on Steam and the KSP website]

3 hours ago, todofwar said:

I think mods might be one of the biggest reasons for this. You can state in your mod a set version you support, and continue to refine and add features rather than catch up to ksp versions. Obviously there are about a million downsides to this but I think there could be a certain niche that appreciates  the option. Maybe a super in depth colony mod for example. 

Well alternatively the mod creator(if they want this immense workload), could keep specific versions for each version and keep adding the same or similar content to each version.

[[WIP] IVA Everything - WIP Release!]

I like this. Docking ports will definitely need an IVA.

[Older versions available on Steam and the KSP website]

21 minutes ago, Stone Blue said:

While I agree with the sentiment, I think this is a fantastical picture of the way things would be...

I've seen many times in release threads, where someone post a problem & needs help... Then there are many back and forth posts, (sometimes exasperating), only to find out after much back and forth and time spent, that someone is actually running a mismatched KSP version with an incompatable mod version... I'm sure this can quickly sour mods attitudes toward the community, and providing good support...Possibly even discouraging them from further development.
I think many modders are already deadset on quickly removing past versions of mods just to head off these issues. (Which really bugs me) Some modders already seem to have ego issues from the get-go, and have made it clear they dont want to bother with the "idiot masses" who arent as intelligent as they are, and are only willing to provide minimum support/documentation/clarity on their mods.
Likewise, I could see it cluttering and possibly overtaxing and wasting Squad Customer Service time, that could better be spent elsewhere.

It's sad, but true. If they do someday implement it(they really should, considering as I've already said, because the means of getting your hands on older versions is borderline illegal, even if you own it), I think there should be a sticky placed that lets people know that threads asking for support for outdated versions will be deleted. It would really benefit places like the Challenges and Mission ideas board because there could be challenges for specific versions. Plus mods would also be a nice thing for the few individuals that would show interest in modding old versions(myself included).

[[1.1.3] BDArmory FPS - A BDArmory Expansion - 0.4 (9-10-16)]

10 minutes ago, V8jester said:

There ya go. So yeah BDA and KIS are required plugins for this mod to function. 

I already had BDA installed, I'm not that much of a mongoloid, it's just that it didn't work until I added the extra plugin.