Jump to content

TheChiefMeat

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheChiefMeat

  1. Yep fresh install, dragged Sigma Release, then SSRSS then the textures. The only thing that was odd was Pluto was missing, but the sizes were perfectly fine. I'm going through it now file by file to try to find the issue. Edit: Annd I think I fixed it myself, give me a second to test it. Edit II: Well, for me this is a confirmed way of getting it to install if you have either no Pluto or the size issue (appears to fix both issues): Install Sigma (dev version) Install SSRSS Install RSS Textures Download the release copy of Sigma Copy the Sigma-Dimensions.v0.4.3.zip\GameData\Sigma\Dimensions\Configs\ReDimension\setDimensions.cfg to GameData\Sigma\Dimensions\Configs\ReDimension With this method I have both Pluto and the SSRSS sized Earth.
  2. Okay, I did the exact same thing, but this time with the dev version of Sigma and I'm getting the normal sized RSS, not the scaled down version. Not sure what's wrong, when I use the release version of Sigma the scaling is correct. KSP 1.1.2 ModuleManager.2.6.24.dll Installed like so: Installed Sigma (dev version) Installed SSRSS Installed RSS Textures Using the KSP_x64.exe to launch.
  3. I'm getting normal sized RSS here, did like so: Installed Sigma (dev version) Installed RSS Installed RSS Textures Installed SSRSS Dragged Settings.cfg to GameData\Sigma\Dimensions Not sure what I'm doing wrong. Edit: Seemed to of fixed it by not using the development version of Sigma.
  4. Hey everyone, like most of you I've been playing around with KSP 1.1 and naturally my mod list is starting to bulk in size. Something I noticed was that my Career save had a significantly better frame rate than a Sandbox save, even when the Career save have multiple ships and the Sandbox save was fresh. (Both stock and modded) I decided to try test this out and find out if a particular mod was responsible for this, alas I couldn't find any evidence. I did however come across this and couldn't come up with any real reason as to why this is a thing: With HUD: http://imgur.com/E0ARY9g Without HUD (F2): http://imgur.com/1MuzwkF Toggling between (F2): http://imgur.com/9VvWOr4 Video showing the FPS drop: https://youtu.be/NFWCOitSov0 I've tried taking away the bulkier mods, but as far as I can tell this happens regardless of how many you have installed and only gets worse the more you install. What's interesting is my peak frame rate (the rate with no HUD) never dips to an unacceptable level, only when I turn the HUD back on does the frame rate take a crap. This problem appear to be cumulative and even happens in stock, hence my posting here. As I include more and more mods to the game the frame rate gets progressively lower unless I disable the HUD and then my FPS goes back to normal. If any mod creators or even a developer could answer this question I would be grateful as I'm at a loss. PS: Does anyone know of a mod that is compatible with 1.1 that give me a seperate HUD on my second screen? I'd happily gain more frames if it means tilting my head a little, thanks. Specs: WIndows 10 I7 2600k 8Gb DDR3 RAM Inno3D GTX 780 KSP: Steam
×
×
  • Create New...