Jump to content

JorgeCS

Members
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

214 Excellent

Profile Information

  • About me
    Kettle launcher
  • Location
    Dublin

Recent Profile Visitors

2,446 profile views
  1. Ello, sorry that I forgot, but yes, you may get the apollo badge

  2. Wow thanks!! and hell yeah, the Wrench works very good, I really like the arrangement of the cockpit/airbrake hehehe! and I see you have the same problem I have, reaching 2km height when preparing to land... but I guess that can be improved NO! Not challenging you at all I want to submit Soon(tm) another replica... but it's been difficult to make it work properly as the wings of the original have a bit of a weird shape... to be continued...
  3. Mmm... no, M1 descending with FAR and wet mode. I guess as the aerodynamics of this 'plane' are so weird, at least as I built it, FAR is more demanding. Without FAR, pure stock, I saw 805ms @ 13km stable, where the engine is less thirsty (but still wet mode) Did you manage to land it vertically without FAR? So FAR xD I couldn't...
  4. Hi! It's been a long time I don't post anything... lately I'm finding more and more annoying having to rely on Imgur or any other image posting site to upload the images for the posts. Anyway... I was working on replicas (sort of) lately. Again, yes. I made a quite flyable C.450 K.450 Koleoptere, and here you have it, working properly with FAR although the only way to achieve Mach>1 is descending: https://kerbalx.com/myrddin/K450-Koleoptere
  5. First to like.... unfortunately I'll have to wait to watch it until tomorrow
  6. I thought I was the only picky one. I did read, thus I didn't submit the survey. Now I finished reading all the posts. Although @Dman979 did a great job (out of his scope, we know ) explaining it, in some cases it seems that what bothered us is not the fact itself about having the T&C, but the 'rudeness' so to say, the difference between our day by day here with the community and 'that' (where is a pukeing emoji when you need it?) Meh, enjoy. One more like that, one less KSP2 that BigCompany will sell.
  7. Hum... I would say 'hold your horses' until you have unlocked the aerospike engine, for a classic 'non-propelled' asparagus ascent. And build your rocket in the most aerodynamic way that you can, as Eve's atmo is... well, soup
  8. Thanks for the hard work, @IgorZ!! Much appreciated! I think I need to report an annoying bug in my 1.11 install. I don't really know if it is better to report it here or in CKAN thread. CKAN marks the new version 1.8 as compatible for 1.11.0 to 1.99.99 so I updated it before reading in the OP that this is not true (minimun version 1.12). The observed behavior which made me report the issue is that in an already deployed vessel with a RTS-1, the option from the GUI to transfer just liquid fuel has disappeared. All the others are still there, including Oxigen, or LF+Ox, and so on. Reverting to 1.7 has proven to be the proper solution, but I guess CKAN info about compatible versions is not *ahem* really accurate (again). So, IgorZ, up to you, if you want me to report it to CKAN, no problem at all Again, thank you!! J
  9. No, you broke it. Come on, just 3 science points from a crew report from the surface of the sun? That's definitely broken, ME!
  10. Now let's just wait for the release Good job!
  11. In my case, all these kinds of contracs don't work, can't be completed: Attach part/finish vessel Repair vessel Bring XXX surface feature from XXX So yeah, Control Alt F12 became my friend lately
  12. She is seriously gorgeous!! Good job!!!
  13. Mmm... OK, I'll bite... Demo is required I can't really tell if Val is taking the jetpack with her, which adds weight to the launch
  14. Grand! Now bring her down (alive if possible )
×
×
  • Create New...