Sidestrafe2462

Getting a logspam of this: NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object scatterer.OceanNode.OnPreCull () (at <db4451e6c1fd443c8b762a77e1ee9797>:0) UnityEngine.DebugLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object) ModuleManager.Unity It's not affecting performance or anything, it's just really wierd.

Isn't that just a hydrogen engine? @Dr. Kerbal

I'd rather we have the latter, just for the pretty disassembly of a multitude of parts. One of the things that got old really fast with one-part fuselages/aircraft mods was that when they got destroyed they just popped. Plus, fiddling with the part sizes is part of the charm of the game. With proc wings I think they should give people basic custom shapes (triangles, rectangles, rounds, +control surfaces for each) to keep the lego aspect of building while allowing people to avoid the horrible puzzle of small/large wing shapes, along with a couple of utility options like fuel storage and structural strength/mass to allow for more optimization. Let people spend hours on wings if they wish, but make it easy to get basic functional shapes without annoying finagling. Perhaps the basic wing shapes could come with some standard presets to match the wings we have in KSP1. And maybe save your own presets too!

Beardy's out on a hand injury, and he has a different collab going rn anways. Just use Kerbal Foundries, it's what everyone else uses.

Do you plan on revamping/updating all the relevant turrets to have pintle MGs? (M1A2 should have a couple, m60 turret miniturrets are nonfunctional, MBT-70 20mm, Tiger MG42, etc). I love the ones we have already, so don't sweat it. You're doing great work!

Just a note since this is insignificant, but the latest release of Scatterer (prerelease as well) seems to be inhibiting or disabling the bloom feature of TUFX. Has something changed that could affect this?

Banned for unashamed advertising

I CHALLENGE YOU! specs and max parts loaded?

Banned for banning the banner who invoked banception before I could point this out: Look for it.

Banned for banning a banner who banned a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner who got banned by a banner no banceptionbans who got banned by a bannerwho got banned by a bannerwho got banned by a bannerwho got banned by a bannerwho got banned by a bannerwho got banned by a banner

Can we get some images for the jet engine plumes?

nicht. @Spaceman.Spiff

Uh huh.

I maintain that Kerbal food is Soylent Green, extracted from the stellar miasma that countless Kerbal's death clouds have produced.

Unplanned ship part disposal service came by!

Ugh. @Wizard Kerbal

sadly no. @Wizard Kerbal

Stick it in your sig instead like how mine is an advertisment for a game I don't play anymore COME TO US @SQUAD

Fool! @Admiral Fluffy

FOR THE EMPE- oh, no. Dashing, delicious, daring @Souptime?

Could someone explain the "battle damage" and advanced targeting settings in the options menu?

banned for not banning, banner

On the upside, you have a cockpit model more detailed than War Thunder. Congratulations!

banned for no good reason, since despite my joy at your recognizing the lack of existence of an ms office cult, i still must ban tu.

BANNED FOR BELIEVING IN THE EXISTENCE OF AN OFFICE CULT, WHEN THERE IS MOST DEFINITELY NOT ONE. DESIST.