Jump to content

COL.R.Neville

Members
  • Posts

    477
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by COL.R.Neville

  1. yeah im using the full reward/xmit mods. 

    but i switched over to what you posted jognt.   

    it takes about 20 or 30 minutes to spin up and ill see whats doing. 

     

    i tried what you posted its doing the same thing. 

    its like there is some kind of int to float thing going on. if its an int then it gets rounded up to 1 yeah  float its 0.7

    yeah im an idiot it has to be a float to do the 0.5 default values. doesnt it hehe. 

    but no idea where 0.7 is coming from its not in any cfg in my gamedata folder so that means its a dll somewhere. 

    ill just have to start pulling them out one by one to find it. 

    and i have 29,941 Files, 3,920 Folders in my gamedata folder hehe. 

     

     

  2. 11 hours ago, JadeOfMaar said:

    That's correct. So the Ranger docking port exists to be used on Endurance while sharing the look of (so it looks made for/to match with) Ranger's built-in hatch. According to their part configs they are compatible with the stock 1.25m Clamp-O-Tron (which I would expect).

     

    okay i got it going by using the ranger docking port on the station. thanks. 

  3. xmitdatascalar when set to 1.0 should have the system xmit 100 percent of the science cap. im setting the base value to equal the science cap with this. I may get less science this way but i only have to do the experiment once in a given mask. 

    @EXPERIMENT_DEFINITION:HAS[~id[deployed*]]:FINAL
    {
        %baseValue = #$scienceCap$
    }

    but right now it doesnt matter what i set xmitdatascalar to its always using 70 percent. i can set it to 2.0 and it still only xmits 70 percent. 

    the problem is some contracts want you to send xmit back 100 percent of the science which the way it is now it can never do.  

    and when i look at the experiment definition in the module manager cache the base value, science cap and xmit data scalar are all set to what they should be. 

    so there is some kind of order of operation error going on im guessing since it seems to be ignoring what xmitdatascalar is set to. 

    and this is on the pad at the ksc so 100 percent connection 

     

  4. 11 hours ago, dlrk said:

    It opens the settings menu

     

     

    17 hours ago, COL.R.Neville said:

    isnt there a green square in the stock buttons that does that already? think you need to be in the tracking station for it to work like that though. 

    one that is usually next to it has a green square and planet and that one shows the planetary logistics system and all of your transfers. 

     

  5. 5 hours ago, dlrk said:

    Sorry for all the questions, but would it be possible to view Life Support time/status in the KSC screen?

    isnt there a green square in the stock buttons that does that already? think you need to be in the tracking station for it to work like that though. 

    one that is usually next to it has a green square and planet and that one shows the planetary logistics system and all of your transfers. 

  6. xmitdatascalar doesnt work anymore.

    you can set it to whatever you want and you are still limited to 70 percent science xmission no matter what connection you have with the ksc

    some contracts require 100 percent of the science data from a given location. any subsequent transmissions result in 0 science. so you only can get 70 percent of the science from an area if you transmit anything. 

     

  7. has anybody noticed that you can only get 70 percent science no matter what you set the xmitdatascalar to? 

    all of my .cfgs are set to xmitdatascalar = 1.0 and im still only getting 70 percent science to xmit. 

    or if you have seen this in the past or anything similiar what was the problem and how did you fix it. 

    usually the problem winds up being a part * mm script gone wild. thats been my experience so far anyway. 

     

  8. On 2/10/2020 at 12:46 PM, Immashift said:

    I'm always a generation or two behind. I can't afford top of the line GPUs and CPUs. I think it's overrated anyway. They're good, yes, but I'm more about spending efficiently. I was humming and hawing about spending $700 on a GPU as it is. KSP seems to react well to brute force hardware power though. It's interesting that my game even loads about 5x faster, and I didn't even change the location of the game. I'm actually running the game from a folder on a home network server through my 10 gigabit LAN. Main PC only has one small SSD for windows, everything else is stored on LAN. Bit of a network nut I am, but it all works, and fast.

    dont feel like the lone ranger man . im running an i7 920 and doing fine. now granted ive got 32 gigs of ram, ssds, and a 1080ti as well. i get a pretty constant 30-40 fps running everything along with about 140 something mods. 

    ram, ssd's, gpu.  takes about 20-30 minutes to load everything but once it gets going no problems. i bought this 920 new in 2008 and have had it running at 3.3 since then. 

  9. get this

    equip an omni tool that is both a wrench and a screwdriver. And i think its the G key to grab the item then the H key to attach it. 

    remember the parts have to be setup to allow surface attach i think. 

     

     

    HERE WE GO AGIN. THIS MERGING REPLIES IS GETTING REALLY OLD> Trying to answer somebody elses question and ask one of my own. Seems the AI overlord is getting stingy with posts. 

     

    Anybody know what setting it is that controls the window size of the seat inventory. 

    not the volume of the slot but the size of the display of the slot. 

  10. 4 hours ago, tees said:

    Hi there im using your great mod whit lunch towers mod and just missing bottom attach node can you in next version add bottom node for engines and SLS/MLS code ?

     

    easy to use let you fix stuff yourself. great for fixin older mods.

  11. this will keep them from getting put in those pods to begin with. 

     

     

    I HATE WHEN THIS STUPID THING MERGES STUFF NOT RELATED>

     

     anybody been seeing NRE's with the science labs? 

    i don think it this mod since this is pretty much just cosmetic.  

    Spoiler

    [ERR 13:47:52.457] Exception handling event onPartActionUICreate in class ModuleScienceLab:System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
      at ModuleScienceLab.updateModuleUI () [0x00000] in <3e135473f56a45478d738eb041ebd6cb>:0 
      at ModuleScienceLab.onPartActionUI (Part p) [0x00025] in <3e135473f56a45478d738eb041ebd6cb>:0 
      at EventData`1[T].Fire (T data) [0x000b0] in <3e135473f56a45478d738eb041ebd6cb>:0 

    [EXC 13:47:52.460] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
        ModuleScienceLab.updateModuleUI () (at <3e135473f56a45478d738eb041ebd6cb>:0)
        ModuleScienceLab.onPartActionUI (Part p) (at <3e135473f56a45478d738eb041ebd6cb>:0)
        EventData`1[T].Fire (T data) (at <3e135473f56a45478d738eb041ebd6cb>:0)
        UnityEngine.DebugLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object)
        ModuleManager.UnityLogHandle.InterceptLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object)
        UnityEngine.Debug:LogException(Exception)
        EventData`1:Fire(Part)
        UIPartActionWindow:CreatePartList(Boolean)
        UIPartActionWindow:Setup(Part, DisplayType, UI_Scene)
        UIPartActionController:CreatePartUI(Part, DisplayType, UI_Scene)
        UIPartActionController:SelectPart(Part, Boolean, Boolean)
        UIPartActionController:HandleMouseClick(Camera, Boolean)
        <MouseClickCoroutine>d__37:MoveNext()
        UnityEngine.SetupCoroutine:InvokeMoveNext(IEnumerator, IntPtr)

     

  12. 5 minutes ago, Virtualgenius said:

    Thanks Zorg i found a SoyuzRealFX.cfg in the folder it doesnt play well with smokescreen and you get zero plummage deleting gives you plummage if you want to take a look at it i can upload it somewhere for you. At this stage its all working and flies so well for an old mod.

    Regards,

    VG

     

    try using the realism overhaul cfg's for the same motor. 

    or grab alcentar's awesome real engines mod.

  13. 3 hours ago, Immashift said:

    You know, I think 9/10ths of the mods I use have been handled by you at one point. It's come to a point where if I want a mod I used to use, but Spacedock shows out of date, I can _almost_ guarantee you've picked it up. Are you a machine?

    Thank you though, for all the effort, on countless mods that would have been dead and forgotten long ago.

    yeah been trying to get him sainthood or at least beatified for awhile. definitely demonstrating heroic virtue. 

×
×
  • Create New...