Sweetie bot

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

1 Follower

About Sweetie bot

  • Rank
    Atomic rocket lovers

Recent Profile Visitors

1,251 profile views
  1. I more likely to put that temperature higher, and just use enough radiators Area to make a good Power/Mass Ratio.
  2. that numbuer just some theoretically Max,like that LOX/ LH 2 Rocket Combustion in chemical equilibrium can get 510s + at max 100% Eff Sorry I dont make that clear pic from :https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/67562119 I just look again, it a Solid CO Mix LOX, thing might get different
  3. I Just think up a new thing We already have a multi fuel-functional chemical engine. So why not add a new fuel mix-- CO/O2 rockets? look for that isp about 250-280s if it can add to NTR after burn mode that will way more better.
  4. Will that Resistance thruster coming soon? I hope that at 300sci level node (same with First power generator)
  5. Wow that a really Quickly Fix, how can u do that :P So quick that For Now we just made some free time to watch Space X Lunch there New Firewor..... Eh... The New test rocket that will gona Booooom (in plan)soon.
  6. Long time not see First I want to say that New UI of Propellant selection are really great to use, I really appreciate it And that TEG come with Variable installed capacity also very useful for build light weight craft. But still look like has some minor bug like, when u reduce that capacity of generator to 20%, that reactor still been require as 100% power, and that rest of Heat Power beem turn in to Waste heat , that make those generator are not beem reduce capacity but efficiency as -80%, For example:Heat to MJ power efficiency with 20% capacity of TEG: A Reactor that with Max 100MW HeatPower, TEG current efficiency in 50%,capacity 20% ideal: H×20% , 0.2H × 50% Reactor run in 20MW to support 20% capacitygen to get 10MW power. Waste heat 10MW current: H ×(50%×20%) Reactor run in 100MW to support 20% capacity gen to get 10MW power. Waste heat 90MW. "H"as Reactor power level. Result in a lot of waste for energy and Over Heat Radiator......
  7. Long time not see First I want to say that New UI of Propellant selection are really great to use, I really appreciate it And also Gen come with Variable installed capacity also very useful for build light weight craft.
  8. LOL I remember that Deinonychus 1-D Chem Eng was put in Fusion Engines type, some how feel that partly correct because they have operate in a similar way —— by putting two thing together to make it heat up and eject out.
  9. I Remember it have Isp throttle For MIF engine , For now It been remove ? again ?
  10. Temporary solutions, If you have Filter Extensions and switch to Squad tag for all part you can see that old part . that can be show that old part still here and have RF feature. Perhaps that is another bug by Filter Extensions that cause Failure to hide old part .(but helpful)
  11. Try use Pebblebed and other reactor like MIF in Same ship, both have link on TEG . And save/load or Warp time. that may happen again
  12. Same Problems, when you open debug— you will see " [KSPI]-managed ProvidedPowerSupplyPer SecondMiniMumRatio illegal Values." that flash very fast and push over other messages. Is that kind of Bug? Edit: I running on KSP 1.4.5, Have RSS and RF,That ship have pebblebed in 1.25m, MIF Fusion Engine 2.5m,2 CANDLE as payload use(Tiny airless lander). one TEFR 0.625m on payload. Pebblebed and TEFR Have no power and lock in Active (0.00%). No fuel consume on Power Generator . However that MIF still can use and work normal. other Solid core NTR are normal too.
  13. Hello, I was playing ksp 1.3.1. And I can't find SolarSail or PhotonSail in Vab and R&D,is that not included in 1.3.1 yet?
  14. After some long time thinking , I re-think about what I'm going to say. The way to improve that Chemical rocket efficiency (in weight way) is reduce oxidizer. To do that, first we need make sure that "fuel" are way more than "oxidizer", and then we don't use oxidizer as a propellant, because it high in molar mass will reduce ISP for engine. I think that a jump out the box to thinking. How to do that? By reuse that oxidizer again. burn fuel and oxdizer in a close system and them let Heat heat up propellant (normally fuel) by pass heat exchanger. Result high Exhaust velocity and low mass follow. Get lot thermal Power to use, and byproduct like water Steam and CO2 need storage, and electrolyze that to get back oxidizer in idle time. Overall: ①A engine that Isp and TWR similar as solid core NTR but it a chemical! It mean no need of rad shied and Eco-friendly, and no special resources are needed.(because nuclear fuel are rare. ②Reducing the risk that fission fuels are easily owned by civilians, it might be use to trade in black market and be use to make a bomb in some secret place. ③Burning time are limited(by how many oxidizer and byproduct storage can use in one time ). So It might burn muti time rather than one burn to finish orbital transfer. ④Low in Technical, rare resoure requite. ⑤tradeoff to reduce Overall power to get mass saving. ⑥ In theory it can use any propellant ! ( rather them few combustion for chemical rocket)