Jump to content

Moiety

Members
  • Content Count

    98
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

70 Excellent

About Moiety

  • Rank
    Drops of Jool

Contact Methods

  1. From the opening post: So it would make sense if things break if that's not installed
  2. FWIW, the male docking-port works with the stock one.
  3. @DairyLee excellent Let us know when it's up. I'd like to contribute some minor things like CLS configs and such.
  4. This looks interesting, will you publish it on GitHub for easy contributions? Some notes: Antenna are listed as "panels" in the interaction menu For some reason no dV information about stages after the 1st one is available to KER or simple dV (in the VAB, in flight they appear after stage-sep) No ladder/something to hold onto for Kerbals on EVA (Artichoke CM) The final stage has around 1000 dV, I think that's well balanced
  5. Here to say I have the same issue. FWIW, a quick EVA also solves the problem. Something to do with vessel change possibly? Read there was an issue with that somewhere on the last page. Running the same versions on Windows 10.
  6. Can you elaborate on that a bit? The various ramps around KSC work pretty well when it comes to suspension test. Oeh I like that!
  7. Something adjacent to the runway could work very well! Something between the runway and the administration building for example. I’m not familiar with the space center in Galileo (outside of Scott’s videos). Do they place anything in that particular spot?
  8. I’m all for a good discussion about whether this is really needed or if it would in fact be helpful or even used. However, if you want such a discussion I propose coming up with better arguments than “You can easily waste time by driving to this one location 10 KM from the KSC”. If you had to drive your rockets 10 KM from the VAB to test them you’d probably ask for a more direct solution too. Perhaps you could turn the throwing stones into throwing creative solutions at the problems. So, anyway To get back to a slightly more positive atmosphere, some benefits: Shorten deve
  9. Having to travel 5-10 minutes before you can test isn’t very helpful. Especially not when you are in a continuous development cycle. It would be much better to have something right there at the KSC. To repeat my question: how would this impact performance? In my experience people wouldn’t mind a good test environment for rovers.
  10. @ZooNamedGames you mean the grasslands? Also, a 10 minute drive with what? The tiny wheels, the LRV type wheels? Also, how would this impact performance? It’s not like this would have a high poly-count.
  11. For what it’s worth, there’s some TAC LS support in my Tantares Patches. (I’ll get to proper support at some point).
  12. @Beale has written some excellent Modding Tutorials.
  13. Everyone that has developed a rover in KSP knows that testing them is essential; unless you really like to discover you didn’t bring enough EC to transmit your science after you launch. What’s missing for this is a rover test range. What’s a rover test range? Well, in its most simple way it’s just a piece of land that has various hills etc to emulate the surface on other planets. This is especially helpful to test suspension. Like this Apollo-era rover testrange: Or this (rather small) ESA test range: Another example: Cool, what else? Hmm, well, sus
×
×
  • Create New...