jonny

Members
  • Content count

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

86 Excellent

1 Follower

About jonny

  • Rank
    Rocketry Enthusiast

Recent Profile Visitors

465 profile views
  1. He can! Eve takes about 400 m/s and Kerbin a bit more. once you made the encounter things become very tedious.
  2. are you sure? On my attempt I used all the EVA propellant, and counted the 600 m/s from the Wiki. I was digging in the .cfg files, but unfortunately there is no ModuleEnginesFX in GameData/Squad/Parts/Prebuilt/kerbalEVA.cfg I did some testing and can tell the following: EVA Propellant is very magical. it has no mass but 5 units of it change yout velocity by 600m/s. 2.5 units of it change the velocity by 300 m/s. We don't need the rocket equation. I Guess even Burbarry can calculate the dV. well, that make things less implausible but I don't agree with such a rule because it diminishes Burbarrys possibility's, and I would like to see someone doing gravity assists with Burbarry. Two records, is what I think as well. But I would suggest the first record: "do whatever you want" and the second: "Burbarry can only survive one day" allow Command Chair?? PS: Be warned @herbal space program my dV record is without EVA. I was on EVA for the cost and mass record.
  3. I just want to clarify: the difference in the final score should be 600m/s, because the 600m/s spent in EVA should Count. Of course the difference for the rescue vehicle itself is 1200m/s. If you don't count the dV in EVA you would look at a benchmark score of ~4800 m/s from my second entry.
  4. That is exactly what I had in mind. That technique of watching the timer should help you avoid missing the target by hundreds of Kilometers, like @Aetharan did. Because if you start the burn 2 seconds early or late you end up 40 or even 60 km in the wrong place depending, on the relative velocity. By watching the Time to closest approach you can determine whether to throttle up or down while you cancel out the relative velocity. You just want to make sure the timer decreases by one second every two seconds.
  5. @linuxgurugamer I think Scott Manly made a Video about a similar problem it was something about the fastest possible transfere to a other planet. He used a very neat trick to get the velocity down with the right Timing: He compared the time to closest approach with the ingame clock and adjust the throttle so that the time to closest Approach ticket down at exactly half the Speed. If you aim for 70% throttle I guess that would leave plenty headroom for errors. Keep in mind that you will fall twards Kerbol during the flip. You might want to aim initially a bit high, depending on the TWR.
  6. Mind you: I only used 5.2 km/s from LKO, but I would like to see my previous record beaten. That would give me the opportunity for a third run... I am looking forward to see your second orbital flip / Jool capture. It is surprisingly difficult, I guess you will need to Aerobrake in Jool's atmosphere.
  7. last weekend I finished the Challenge with a single mission conquering the final 4 celestials. Of course manned, and as always without visiting any celestial twice. @5thHorseman that is a great set of rules you put together for this challenge. I had a lot fun, and the missions felt never repetitive or boring. The full album is here: http://imgur.com/a/yGqgJ But every important step is in the Spoiler Eve Transfer + Landing Gilly + Return Minmus + Mun
  8. Mun? Minmus? What are you talking about? I think there is only Eve and Gilly left to explore. Is there something I didn't know about the Kerbol system?
  9. It took me a long time, but I finally came to the point where i could start my Jool 5 mission in my Caveman Evolved plus Munless Night career. I just Upgraded the R&D center and had very low funds. therefore i am going for the low cost/mass sub-challenge. KSP 1.3 Linux 64bit Mods: [x] Science! BetterTimeWarpContinued KAC KER Precise Node RCS Build Aid The vessel is a SSTO which costs 94452 and has a wet mass of 43.588t
  10. Here we go!! I Finished the Munless Night challenge with a Jool-5 mission. I never had that much fun unlocking the entire tech tree before. Usually I end up with a Science Lab on Minmus to unlock all before I go interplanetary. But the limitations make the Gameplay very rewarding and fun.
  11. It took me a week to plan, days to complete and hours to upload and comment. But I finally finished my Jool 5 mission. I installed Precise Node for the mission.
  12. Thank you very much for your effort. I want to know if you did try to reload a quicksave made on the Runway and see if there is a performance difference between the initial launch and the Quickload. For me the vessel gets to 370 m/s at sea level at the initial launch, and 330m/s if i load a quicksave on the runway. I am able to get very consistent results (373m/s or 329m/s) as long as I try to keep the altitude between 0m and 200m.
  13. I didn't know this. I uploaded the craft to dropbox https://www.dropbox.com/s/2j8eldshodc5iju/Jool 5 SSTO.craft?dl=0
  14. I specifically didn't ask for improvements to the vessel itself, as I experienced the bug with several designs and think the problem is more fundamental. My objective with this question is not to improve my Spaceplane. I want to know if the bug is present for other operating systems as well. I might consider to setup a dual boot if the bug is related to Linux or my specific system. If the bug is not present on other systems I want to know which is the "correct" performance of my Spaceplane. If the Spaceplane is capable of orbit on a not affected system I will assume the Performance direct after launch is "correct". This unfortunately means that I have to do do the Laythe testing on a other system. On the other hand, If the Spaceplane is not capable of orbit. I will consider to ask for advice how to improve my design.
  15. Hello all together, I am currently testing SSTO designs for my upcoming Jool 5 mission, and experienced a strange bug: my SSTO is capable to get to LKO. But if I revert to launch or load a quicksave, I made on the runway, it becomes impossible. I am unable to get beyond 400m/s after the quickload/revert. I created a bugreport: http://bugs.kerbalspaceprogram.com/issues/15664 Unfortunately I have no Windows and don't want to spend the money on a Windows key (running Linux). In order to get my mission going I would like to know if the bug is related only to Linux or even my specific system. Can somebody please try to reproduce the bug on Windows and possibly Linux (the .craft file is attached toe the bugreport). If this bug does not appear on Windows please tell me whether the vessel is capable to get to LKO on Windows. Either way, it would be unfair, and i would see if I can hack a Windows key. Thank you very much in advance.