KSPACE

If I could have one change that would help me the most in KSP, it would be a better launcher. The ability to download mods, purchase DLCs, and just update the game takes me upwards of hours. However, unless there is a easier way to install them, I believe a launcher that can do this on its own would be incredible. Even uploading ship designs would be a nice feature. Different operating systems have differing file layouts so a combatibility would be very helpful for new players who lack tutorials that use the same system as they do.

guys, the more we make the devs excited, the more content we get.

That is an interesting concept. I love the idea that there's an adventure that one can choose to undertake. However, without motivation to go to these monoliths, players may be unwilling to go there until everything else is completed (except for a Dres mission).

I want to be very clear about this idea if some things were not obvious. The point is that this is OPTIONAL and otherwise would only be an easter egg (like KSP1). However, this is still just an idea. It can be improved undoubtably. Instead of locking out technology until a monolith is discovered, there could be an instant access to technology or signifgantly lower research time/points (idk if they'll change that system).

Planet that spins so fast it starts looking kinda squished. Planet rotation near equator would make the gravity half as apparent.

I also want to mention that this would be the high-tier tech, like metallic hydrogen engines and antimatter storage (assuming that's a thing). The monoliths would also not be too hard to find anyways, always on or around the same celestial objects and easily detectable. I was thinking on Kerbin, buried under Minmus, and in as a Trojan of Vall (the idea being that Vall is tidally locked so that Vallhenge always points to where the monolith was left). Just an idea. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Of course, this would be a optional setting for campaign-style gamemodes

Yes, but the idea is that certain tech cannot be unlocked until a kerbal has touched each monolith or a monolith has been returned to Kerbin.

In the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, Monoliths are found on the Earth, buried in the Moon, and in orbit around Jupiter. We've already had monoliths on planetary surfaces, but we haven't had them buried underneath the surface or in orbit around planets. For KSP 2, the monolith hunt could be expanded by adding interstellar Monoliths that aliens would have placed to tell when the Kerbals had gotten advanced enough to go into different star systems. A monolith would be required to increase the Kerbals technology further and further, the first letting them get off Kerbin after a plane flight from the KSC. The second would give Kerbals the technology to get them from Kerbin to the Kerbol system using chemical rockets. The third monolith would give them efficient rockets and interstellar tech. And finally, the fourth, if returned from an alien world back to Kerbin, would count as beating the game. Not only is this a great way to add a 'Campaign' to the game, it also allows speedrunning that isn't based on just a tech tree or a Eve mission.

If you have a relay network around Eeloo you would get continuous connection, and if you want the coolest connection try many of these in KEO (like GEO, I forget wahtever):

Should time warp be extended? really not much to say right now so just ______ OMG I'm so sorry, I made a big Boo Boo, just look at the meme

Hold on.... Miles? Just... Just... Why?!?!?! We don't live in the dark ages (hopefully).

Should Larger SRBs exist in stock KSP? (I know it's early) If you somehow did not know, the following is helpful info for you to indulge yourself in. *Ahem* Stock SRBs are all small radial size and combining them with struts and other crap works, but it's just so messy (for me at least).

What does "ME" mean in this instance?

If it orbits perfectly in Kerbisynchronous Equatorial Orbit/KEO directly above the KSC then I might go Woah! If it also has artificial gravity then Ya Yeet (whatever that means).

It would be amazing if they could take their helmet off once they were at over 5 km or so in altitude because of not only a decreased pressure, but a decrease in oxygen because of a lighter gas piling up on the oxygen . If the moon had massive mountains it would have the feature of breathable air higher altitudes rather than lower ones.

Yes, but to get results that are double as accurate you would need orders of magnitude more votes (which is difficult), for now it's about 50% - 90% of people. By the way I did hesitate and I was in a rush and didn't want to type much more (also it's 69 respondents not 59* ).

it means: KSP ACE or K SPACE ("K" means Kerbal)

From a poll I created, the number would actually be 84.21% of people wanting a second gas planet. By the way I liked your post, because in my book if you quote you must like.

Plutonium (or Blutonium) is usually for deep space where solar power isn't as useful so I would also add another planet that is further than even Eeloo so that it really could be put to use.

Ok, realistically 5x more than now. It's important to realize how long this would take in real life.

Simple poll: Would you like to see another gas planet besides Jool? If so describe the moon(s) you would want in the GP2 system. FYI : I plan to do a poll almost once a month because of how popular (kinda) this was. Hint for next poll (minimally encoded, I'm not THAT nice): Wait, wait, check my other new poll now:

Wouldn't it be great if you could set a second or third stage to have an automatic MECO or SECO so you could land a first stage booster?

2.5 and 1.875 (DLC) solid rocket boosters

Sorry, I revised the topic, meaning your response became less relevant even if being entirely true.