k00b

thanks, pretty sure that's what f9 is for; but i maybe mistaken!. (on the basis, maneouvers in space UNLIKE getting into orbit in the first place, take negligable amount of fuel (i.e. "relatively speaking") vs. the extra "VAB work" = "f5, f9 combo FTW")).

whats the point in the tracer ship launch ? - thanks

if they were making me do engineering work on it, on a daily basis, having sold it; then YES - obviously. [snip]

thanks; but as jool is so very very far away; don't you just burn prograde, when the launch pad is [a gravity turn] away from facing it's direction ? (- i.e. guess and then f9 if that doesn't work ?) or am i being stupid ?.

if you are leaving kerbin to the suns orbit; then why don't you just keep on burning prograde ? (i don't get it / thanks).

need a fatter/longer/other detachment coupler so they don't flop about and instead of having to place multiple (due to VAB sticking problems) - are we getting that too ?

it is about how KSP 2 is going to be garbage; hence posting in KSP 2. like giving a halloween pumpkin to a tree shredder. [snip] - the node HOWEVER according to PB666 is: thus it is a transistional piece for "space flight".... if i was taketwo, i would ban you from playing on my games for insinuating i was a "cash-grabbing company". (i have only suggested, they might be heavy handed and that their new game titled "KSP2" is going to be COMPLETE GARBAGE. (i.e. could be saving them ALOT of money (- not that i would have the audacity, to myself call them a "cash grabbing company"...). some people.

phew!; it's good they didn't steal $1.4million; that is a relief. (they must be just a MASSIVE failure of a company / videogame "developer" (sarasm being "developer") then ? "my mistake"... if you are saying taketwo are the ones "doing the dirty" on squad ? then do you think it was taketwo who FORCED squad to put rotors in the game also ? or no ? (interesting theory)

they can't be that poor if they are giving money away to crowdfunding.... i would use the term "excrements videogame developer" as opposed to "nasty corporation" though ? what do you guys think ?

'People who back Kickstarter projects are offered tangible rewards or experiences in exchange for their pledges' 1)you start a crowdfunding campaign 2)you aquire LOTS of money 3)you pocket the money, quickly change your company name and pretend it was "becuz of teh "projections" 4)BINGO. you don't watch southpark ?

1) you are talking to yourself whilst spamming screen shots taken by yourself, and for yourself to look at ???. that's not me "moving the goalposts" - that is called "egomania". 2) you are obtaining a speed of 160m/s... *baring in mind jetplanes can go over 1000m/s; (see thread title / page 1 in thread (i.e. "try reading";) 160m/s is completely not *"effective"... (it is VERY basic relativity - or instead of wasting your time, you would be posting pictures of a command module hovering 2ft off the ground going "SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"). IT HAS BEEN 3 MONTHS NOW AND NOBODY HAS COME UP WITH ANYTHING YET. good luck with that one.

so i hear kerbals is going to be completely ruined now (beyond rotors... / see above about how great the "crowd funding" (READ:"NON PROFITABLE") company formaly known as "uber entertainment" (sarcasm being the "entertainment"), now known as "star theory" as from wikipedia: 'On October 2, 2014, Uber Entertainment announced a new Kickstarter campaign for a real-time strategy game, Human Resources. The goal was set for $1.4 million, though the project was cancelled October 21, 2014 after projections showed the fundraiser would fail to raise the needed capital'. [snip] what do you guys think of the facts above that cannot be argued ???

i was thinking we need to "teleport" electricity from the sun to gain thrust because "rockets don't work very good" you know how they have mobile phones that get "charged through the air" (i dunno if that works where there is no air). oh right; for no reason then just as i thought.... (they already have enough satelites / and politicians can "suck my balls" / PRETTY SURE the military looks after "the economy" (thus you have stated the same one thing 2x and also included idiots....) - the operation paperclip rocket guy from germany SHOULD have been able to have a bash at getting to mars (how much time and resources later ....and now ....we want to goto mars ...when he could have done it already in year whatever, with "poo poo technology" - BORING). (enjoy drawing squiggles people, because that is all you are doing (- beyond wasting resources)). - thanks for the help though... "seems the engines with the differential are the best ones" (pertaining to my long jeb and bill rescue flight mission to laythe.) P.S. i bet space station lettuce tastes worse then earth lettuce. I loveING KNEW IT !

whats the point of sending rockets into space in the real world environment though - at all ? like really ?. "good enough" to do what ??? (BEYOND physicisits quanitifying their squiggles in order to "create the illusion of [their own, alleged] intelligence".... (and growing lettuce) logically we need to wait for an electric propulsion system (i.e. if elon musk is reading; please hurry up...) or put the toys away completely ?. (i would rather use a stainless steel then an aluminium frying pan also... but maybe it is about time we maybe stop plagurising a trains engine ?).

this is suggestive that humans need to get better at mettalurgy and stop making things that they know are going to tear to pieces though doesn't it ? like last time i saw they were messing about on the space station growing lettuce and talking to a monochrome computer face "robot" that doesn't even work ?. like i am saying; my maths isn't great but... "expenditure of organic matter (fossil fuels and expensive metals (and cost of harvesting therein) x chemistry and mathematics (human resource) dividied by "it might not work anyway" (baring in mind the human knowlege it is not "efficient" (as above)) = ..."growing lettuce" doesn't seem to quite "add up" ?.

there already is a timewarp ???!!! whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat (- i did not know that) ...yup, in a rush; i have jeb and bill stuck on laythe and the space junk and hours and hours of spent gameplay trying to get there to get them back (into orbit), unsuccesfully, over and over again was getting rather laborious.... getting on my "NERV"(s). 4x will do me nicely though - THANKYOU!.

have you tried capital letters and exclamation marks ?.

oops - sorry about that. can anybody expand re: 4:31 of the video "this can lead to... undesirable phenomena" what the "phenomena" is ? - does he mean "heat vs mettallurgy" ? seems like "over expansion" (or what would be "linear output" ?) is a "good thing" (if they weren't cones... / re: aerospike), or that they should custom build conical engines for individual rockets every single time (if building a new rocket) ?. ...think maybe mother nature wants to keep her children grounded.

just looked the guy up - must have been pretty sizable ballons to offset the ball(s) size... (you can see he has his own special red box for them:)

because it's about time the LV-N "Nerv" Atomic Rocket Motor "hurried up"...

i think we need OP to define what they mean by "in flight" (- i am liberally taking this to mean "far far away in space" on the basis their rocket design is way beyond "noob" level... (hence logically "either electricity or antennas or satelites problem" imho) "human error problem".

i am guessing OP forgot to put an antenna on it OR not appropriate satelites in orbit. otherwise running out of electricity because of all the probe cores... (are there solar arrays in shroud and are you deploying them when in orbit?) (guessing because i have experienced both problems....)

thankyou very much!, i will attempt to get learning...

thanks; yeah i suck too bad at maths for physics - they can keep their squiggles... so it's basically the effect of the output matter on the surrounding air ? / vs void there of higher up... accounting for the numbers ? hence me not understanding (focusing on the engine) "ohhhhh" - can you direct me to any specific reading about the above, that would be great (dunno what the field is called even) thankyou!

your electric rotor plane is powered by 1925l of liquid fuel ??? "thats strange" (SARCASM).