pmborg

yes, true but at least for me i got 100fps of speed upgrade was nice. the worst thing for me is the rocket vab editor how it can be so limited? compared with ksp1, like move camera up and down and the camera is never where i want so its a nightmare for me

at least it seems to me that now there is a huge speed improvement 356 FPS (at 4K) on the main menu is really good, since the first version.

I think that you should try to remove Principia mod first, it is causing a lot of exceptions: Failed to load assembly C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\Kerbal Space Program\GameData\Principia\x64\serialization.dll ... Then try again without it and post the log again if the problem persist.

When I changed to Full HD resolution I was puzzled with image being generated in 2 monitors... This patch is better but still a long road ahead Worst than that is the mouse, now appears on the screen of right side and only appear in right side... but the images are being generated also on the center monitor

Hello! I will post here the detail HW also posted in other posts. Detailed Hardware: The computer is 1.5 years old with an RTX4080 upgrade. - TOWER: FRACTAL DESIGN Focus G Black - POWER: GIGABYTE P850GM 850W 80 Plus Gold Modular (Recommended to use with RTX 4080) - Motherboard Model: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - RAM: CRUCIAL Ballistix 32GB 2X16GB DDR4 36000MHz CL16 Red (Recommended Model to use with AMD Processor) - Processor Name: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor AM4BOX - CPU COOLER: NOCTUA NH-D15S Chromax Black - GRAPHICS CARD: GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC 16GB GDDR6X - WIN DRIVE: Gigabyte ssd aorus 1tb m2 gen4-nvme - KSP DRIVE: SSD WESTERN DIGITAL SN850 2TB M.2 2280 Black NVMe Gen4 (Word Class M2 SSD) - 3x Monitor: DELL S2721QS IPS 4ms 27″ 4K UHD 16:9 FreeSync NOTE: The BIOS settings are very important to allow CPU to boost on single thread application. The Kerbal Space Program 2 - Settings: The quality of the image is still excellent!

Congratulations to the team now I can pull more than 100FPS in 4K resolution, now is deftly playable And now also the physics are a little bit better.

To be honest I felt the same, I paid ok I dont regret it , but the current state is more a lack of respect, than a beta is more like an alfa or something worst. In the end I just closed the KSP2 and was very angry and very irritated spend 1hour trying to do something that in KSP1 I do in 1min... no that is too much... And I was not prepared from passing from one very realistic simulator to just a game...

All that new mechanism is by far the worst thing that KSP2 have for me at the moment.

I understand that the developers of KSP2 should now look in a way to get it running on Lower Specs machines. For example: reduce the plumes volume reduce the clouds reduce the polygons in the mesh better use of LODs in 3D objects use textures also with LODs Simple things that will make possible to run in a low spec PC.

I am running on a avg. of 100FPS as you can see in my previous pictures.

Hello, just change the default settings, try this its similar as KSP1:

Almost there: The button that do the wrap speed function, also do the pause, nice!

The solar panels cannot be retracted as before lets call it a feature:

Yes first thing to do is to change the default settings:

THIS is worst than the default settings: I am still looking for the pause button after start the launch... if someone know how to do it, please let me know.

I am missing the TWR of the engines in VAB... I have do idea if it will fly... just guessing? Ok I got it ... its hide at engineering report icon:

2 minutes to install it nice! First print screen at 4K: Looks even better than some youtube videos that I saw before:

Thank you all for the amazing work that you have been done. Just keep up the road of what you are doing.

I am looking forward to explorer the new Planets, check the natural resources over there and look for the new easter eggs. Try to see if is possible to make a ship capable of visit all the planets and return. I will also look for a big improvement in my opinion which is the procedural parts. I love the way that now all the parts can be filtered. And I would love to test best PC almost identical to the ones that were used in ESA site. The ESA site is wonderful if we compare to the original Kerbal launch site of KSP1. I am interested to check the curve how is performance degradation with the increasing number of parts in a ship.

Sometimes the site https://kerbalx.com/ is down and you get that error. You can disable the kerbalx mod or wait until it get back online I hope it helped.

I will play on first day of course

My vote was yes, I ran the KSP standard version with no mods at 180FPS at 4K and its limited at 180FPS... posted before on: Detailed Hardware: The computer is 1.5 years old with an RTX4080 upgrade. - TOWER: FRACTAL DESIGN Focus G Black - POWER: GIGABYTE P850GM 850W 80 Plus Gold Modular (Recommended to use with RTX 4080) - Motherboard Model: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - RAM: CRUCIAL Ballistix 32GB 2X16GB DDR4 3600MHz CL16 Red (Recommended Model to use with AMD Processor) - Processor Name: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor AM4BOX - CPU COOLER: NOCTUA NH-D15S Chromax Black - GRAPHICS CARD: GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC 16GB GDDR6X - WIN DRIVE: Gigabyte ssd aorus 1tb m2 gen4-nvme - KSP DRIVE: SSD WESTERN DIGITAL SN850 2TB M.2 2280 Black NVMe Gen4 (Word Class M2 SSD) - 3x Monitor: DELL S2721QS IPS 4ms 27″ 4K UHD 16:9 FreeSync DEMO on "Ultra": mods. https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/58565527 I don't know how to export the BIOS settings, but 20% of the trick is there to unleash the power of the processor on single core.

Comming soon never have done so much sense... since I see it for 3 years and a half...

Actually the graphics in real live screen are much better, than in the youtube video, due compression a lot of color and reflects are lost, but gives an idea at least! You can check your settings with this video:

Parallax Ultra Settings Files @4K: