-
Content Count
42 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
29 ExcellentAbout Lo.M
-
Rank
Rocketeer
Profile Information
-
Location
playing ksp in Sedna
-
Interests
dwarf planets, Fusion, Antimatter, Orion Pulse Engine, Atomic Engines, dwarf planets, Ceres, Onion
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Something like a Paint to create your flags?
-
Everybody is! Welcome to the forums.
-
In ksp2 we could have leisure, and a level of happiness the more leisure the happier the kerbals would be and thus the more efficient their tasks would be.
-
Non-rocket spacelaunch (Except the space elevator) reevaluated.
Lo.M replied to Lo.M's topic in KSP 2 Discussion
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarTram https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyhook_(structure) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_driver- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
- mass driver
- skyhook
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
After you have reevaluated and researched. Those are the best options.
- 1 reply
-
- mass driver
- skyhook
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
The material would withstand, on small planets and natural satellites, but as K ^ 2 said, perhaps, it is the maximum that chemistry can support. In addition, carbon nanotubes are very difficult to produce. I would prefer a skyhook or a magrail or even a mass drive, much easier to do. There is a way to produce graphene in an industrial way more and of poor quality not ideal for an space elevator.
-
I know it's not against the forum rules, but it can cause fights, so I always avoid talking about it. But I will add to the list.
-
Ok edited
-
Para discutir elevadores espaciais, venha aqui.
-
terraforming is too complex for ksp
-
35 years
-
And Tachyon drive and unobtanium drives