Jump to content

Lo.M

Members
  • Content Count

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

29 Excellent

About Lo.M

  • Rank
    Rocketeer

Profile Information

  • Location
    playing ksp in Sedna
  • Interests
    dwarf planets, Fusion, Antimatter, Orion Pulse Engine, Atomic Engines, dwarf planets, Ceres, Onion

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Something like a Paint to create your flags?
  2. Everybody is! Welcome to the forums.
  3. Lo.M

    Leisure

    The farm kerbals produce a little more food, the mining kerbals produce a little more resources, the engineer kerbals can build / improve / expand with less resources, the scientific kerbals produce more science.
  4. Lo.M

    Leisure

    In ksp2 we could have leisure, and a level of happiness the more leisure the happier the kerbals would be and thus the more efficient their tasks would be.
  5. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarTram https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyhook_(structure) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_driver
  6. After you have reevaluated and researched. Those are the best options.
  7. The material would withstand, on small planets and natural satellites, but as K ^ 2 said, perhaps, it is the maximum that chemistry can support. In addition, carbon nanotubes are very difficult to produce. I would prefer a skyhook or a magrail or even a mass drive, much easier to do. There is a way to produce graphene in an industrial way more and of poor quality not ideal for an space elevator.
  8. I know it's not against the forum rules, but it can cause fights, so I always avoid talking about it. But I will add to the list.
  9. Yes, only works for small/medium sized planets tho and not for large planets Since we don't have a material strong enough to support a space elevator even a carbon nanotube.
×
×
  • Create New...