Jump to content

Philae_Rosetta2021

Members
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

17 Good

About Philae_Rosetta2021

  • Rank
    Space tourism here we come!

Profile Information

  • Location
    On a lonely planet slowly spinning its way to damnation...
  • Interests
    Ignoring physics.... Do I really need to put anything else here?

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I have given this some thought, and I have decided to retire from the competition. I have done much better than I expected, and I will settle for what I have done. Thank you @Kerminator K-100 for the great challenge, it was exciting and fun! Philae_Rosetta2021 signing out and wishing everyone a very good day!
  2. Okay no problem. I thought that it was a bit over the mark with the speeds I will try again and try and bring back proof of survival. BTW, the Laythe thing was ages ago and I wasn't planning on submitting it. Just shows what interplanetary approaches can do.
  3. Here is my Small Aurora Space Station https://imgur.com/a/6BZ8Nbo And my larger Aquila Space Station https://imgur.com/a/8HLgiml
  4. It doesn't say anything about having to keep your craft alive in the rules I thought that it didn't say anything about keeping it alive in the rules...
  5. Well, I ran all the way almost to Minmus' orbit, then when under 50km, solid boosters! all the way till i exploded. But I thought that you didn't have to stay in 1 piece to complete the challenge?
  6. I have done it. Ballistic mode at 43,000m. The results speak for themselves: 13,472m/s over land, according to the results. https://imgur.com/a/u12nqZG
  7. I think this will end up in a contest between the two of us eh? Hats off to you for beating my original score, by the way. Very well done.
  8. Here is my first attempt, fully stock. It is small, fast, and scarily manoeuvrable. You can only stall if you go slower than 35m/s, but even then, it is so light that you can recover it very easily. It even surprised me. https://imgur.com/a/UiNgmsw Here is my first bomber, also very manoeuvrable. https://imgur.com/a/oqK2Wxm
  9. Is this a challenge? As in, do you have to make them as big as you can, small, crazy or cool? Anyway, here is my Aquila Space Station: https://imgur.com/a/qKCeFSZ And my Aurora Space Station: https://imgur.com/a/prsHbCg Hope You like them PS Yes the mystery goo on my aurora space station IS rotating
  10. Okay, time to bring my game up I see. Let's go for 7000ms Onwards and Upwards!!! (or rather, faster and more horizontal ) Let's try ballistic. Which reminds me, I managed to get 7200, while (trying) to get to Laythe a few months back. Pity I didn't screenshot it. (Don't ask about the lander)
  11. Just a quick question. How do you put your badges under your posts?
  12. Yeah, but in this case I will leave it, as it actually helps my aircraft to get off the ground. Unorthodox, but great for my (very) unstable aircraft Thanks for the tip though!
  13. Here is my creation. It isn't very small or light, but the best I could do. Take-off is ..... questionable. It starts off backward at a rate of 10m/s for some reason, clear the runway. Then you throttle up and use the runway as a sort of ramp. It is very sprightly and It can go 250 m/s. Landing is very hard (intact) because of it's tendency to veer left very dramatically. It is made of 1 hex probe core, small circ. intake, mk0 fuel tank, juno engine, 4 small steerable landing gear, 1 Av-r8 winglet and 2 advanced canards. https://imgur.com/a/oGQsHDd
×
×
  • Create New...