Jump to content

SkyFall2489

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    535

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SkyFall2489

  1. SkyFall2489
    All this argument.. why can't we let players choose? If there's an option not yet available, that's what mods are for.
  2. SkyFall2489
    OK, so my destination should be right -whoAAA Oh, so that's why my topographical map had all those lines bunched up here... Starship Earth!
  3. SkyFall2489
    All of this... Great for some people, not for others. But what if we did both? Keeping the main physics framework but allowing several different multiplayer "modes", as well as allowing mods to add more, lets every player play KSP2 their way. We don't have to go with one way or another.
  4. SkyFall2489
    -5
  5. SkyFall2489
    1710
  6. SkyFall2489
    1698
  7. SkyFall2489
    1696
  8. SkyFall2489
    It's just that KSP2 is meant for players of KSP1, so it's best to not drastically change up the whole game. I'd at least like for KSP2 single player to be mostly like KSP1, and if a multiplayer system changes up the whole game so much that KSP2 single player must be also drastically changed (such as eliminating timewarp) then it won't be the same game. Oh, and there's a mod called Bon Voyage that allows time warping rover travel.
  9. SkyFall2489
    1693
  10. SkyFall2489
    -8
  11. SkyFall2489
    1688
  12. SkyFall2489
    -8
  13. SkyFall2489
    More ground anchors, especially bigger ones, would be great! Maybe something for another mod tho. Which mod exactly?
  14. SkyFall2489
    -9
  15. SkyFall2489
    -9 I'm not on any side - what I do is I just undo what the last player did.
  16. SkyFall2489
    I think they are trying to find a way to remove direct physics simulation from long distance travel, having you just set manuvers, auto execute them, and drain ship fuel appropriately, with no time warp within SOIs. Not sure entierly how it would work out, but why reinvent the wheel? Plus, time warp is used for other things too. Such as waiting for crew respawns, waiting for ISRU to fill up your tanks, and more.
  17. SkyFall2489
    I put this in the main multiplayer thread, but it applies well here:
  18. SkyFall2489
    -9
  19. SkyFall2489
    All of the major MMO type changes I feel like change the game too much, such that is no longer the Kerbal Space Program we know and love. Sure, an MMO with semi unrealistic physics or a strategy game without much piloting would be great fun, but it is not the point of KSP2. The original KSP1 is a game of engineering, manual piloting, and some realistic orbital mechanics, and many of these ideas just change the game too much to be KSP2. I'm not saying they are bad ideas, they are just great ideas for a new franchise / series.
  20. SkyFall2489
    Hey, look what I- ERRORERRORERRORERRORERRORERRORERRORERRORERRORERRORERROR(You get the point) Sailing a sailboat without a sail
  21. SkyFall2489
    -9
  22. SkyFall2489
    1686
  23. SkyFall2489
    Nope! @Akagi
  24. SkyFall2489
    Which button was that again? Oh, the one on the side of the hull. rocket powered boat (no sail this time)
  25. SkyFall2489
    It would be great to have more base mounts. Currently, if you don't want your base to slide, you slap launchclamps on it, which are very ugly... A new set of ground fasteners for large bases would be great! I'm definitely adding this to my save after release.
×
×
  • Create New...