Jump to content

Ryaja

Members
  • Posts

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ryaja

  1. 6 hours ago, DDE said:

    less snide note, I do find it weird that the ship ostensibly out of control smashed the support pretty much head-on even though

    Apparently the ship lost power, restating what I said before while very unlikely, an intentional cut is possible ruling it out pre investigation is a bad idea. Most likely something went wrong and this was a random occurrence that happened to cause the tragedy.

     

    An example could be if the brakes on a car went out and it looked accidental but would you rule out foul play? What if on the like 1% chance it was especially if lives were taken. Saying we haven't ruled something out isn't saying it's likely it is saying it is possible even if by a hair.

  2. 4 hours ago, Nuke said:

    there was an 8-man construction crew filling potholes on the bridge. seems the vessel contacted the local department of transportation and were able to halt traffic in time. but nobody informed the construction crew. there were 2 survivors.

     

    this situation has made me question the competence of reporters though. one reporter seemed ignorant of the physics involved and tried to blame the construction crew. another claimed that there were 20 casualties. another used the phrase "we still haven't ruled out terrorism". it was clear from the source footage what really happened and they still had to make stuff up.

    I think while unlikely terrorism is possible, it hit the support which would take the whole bridge down squarely. It was probably a mistake though.

×
×
  • Create New...