Jump to content

BobbyDausus

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BobbyDausus

  1. I have no clue who is working on this game and what they are doing...Lost any particle of hope to play this game.
  2. 3 patches have been released already for a game that came out at the same time with KSP. Sons of the Forest
  3. you sure? Bring me that potato PC,i would love to give it a try.I play everything at 60+ FPS ,this one gives me under 10. How come? So can i still play the game? No
  4. No,because that might fit your cause and not the majority.We can agree that the majority can't play the game right?The few that can play the game at an acceptable performance are few and far between.We can't even play it,let alone encountering bugs :)) . So whats more important?
  5. Many would agree that the list should've been something like this : Fixes included: -Performance -Performance Optimization -More FPS -Performance Since the majority can't even play it
  6. Well,at this point it is well known that the game runs very bad and the graphics are not amazing.You will be able to play 1080P medium . Keep in mind that on 1080P the game looks quite bad.You can give it a try,ask a friend to let you try it out and if you like it,go head and buy it
  7. I'm playing KSP 1 with the BETA clouds from EVE....it's quite amazing,quite better looking than KSP 2 clouds,not to mention the FPS ,got full graphic mods overhaul and it looks good
  8. I'll give you the best example of a player who quits the game. ME ,because i can't really play it,many of us can't play it with this poor performance.
  9. Holy sheet,the 4090 is twice as strong as the older gen? like 3090 6900XT ? I mean these 6900XT and 3090 should've been blazing through this game at 1000 fps......but then we woke up
  10. But it is a simple proccess ,removing stuff is easier than fixing,but i guess that in order to make the game run better,they'd have to remove the planets and leave us in space basically :))
  11. Priority is the performance since half of the players can't even play it.I would've pushed out a small optimization by removing what's causing the fps problem.
  12. I agree.UI issues are not as important since the majority of the people can't actually play the game due to bad performance
  13. Sleepless nights at the bar perhaps.If i'm trying to sell something to a community and i receive backlash on my product,i'm pretty sure i won't sleep till i fix the issue.Let the house burn,i won't move a muscle,it's weekend everybody
  14. have no clue on how to install that,tried with both Space Warp and Bsphinx or whatever it's called and no luck.........If you would type a small tutorial,that would be awesome
  15. Problem is that we got something that was supposed to be developed in those 4+ years......The rotten orange slice we've got is a straight up joke. Me and you can pull of a better game in 4+ years.Man this game is so empty and badly optimised.It's like me drawing a TV on a sheet of paper and give it to ya and say ,,enjoy your new TV,,
  16. The game is unplayable at the moment,unless you have a very beefy system.For your PC i would recommend a new GPU and more RAM,it'll give a new life to it
  17. What baffles me the most is that there are people out there putting this whole situation under the ,,It's an early access game,, thing.I can't remember in my 30 years of existance about any early access game that ran this bad.Even if you would try to mess up a game with the most intesive and unrealistic mods,you still can't make it run this bad.I have no clue how did they manage to go with this,i would get the most un-optimised textures ,24k resolution,millions of polygons and still would come out with better FPS.Hopefully they know what's going on and will get fixed asap.As far as i can see,there are no announcements or news from the team yet
  18. Yes,im with you on this one.The memory starts filling up to 4GB hitting the ceilling and staying there.No matter the resolution ,i even went down to 720P and similar FPS ,then i've changed from 1080 LOW to 1080 HIGH,no difference in performance at all.
  19. It works 100% .The game appeared on a ,,certain,, website 2 minutes after launch.I bought the game,but some of my friends didn't,that's all i'm gonna say.With or without DRM,it is inevitable
  20. I'm ready to put my money on the table and tell you that all the early access games i've had were playable,yes i've experienced tons of bugs,crashes,glitches,performance issues,but not performance like this mate........It's like mining while playing
  21. Yes,but it should've not been like this.Anyway,hopefully things get better.I do think the issue is the actual terrain......Because those fps drop once Kerbin is in the picture,looking at space has acceptable frames
  22. You don't compare it with a game developed by the same team ,compare with others,even lower budget one's and you'll find out that usually EARLY ACCESS mean it's garbage but playable,this is not playable at all
  23. That's the thing,you should've been able to play it decently given the game's graphics and all that
  24. I would like to inform you that Early Access titles are usually playable by majority from low to high end users.This ain't
×
×
  • Create New...