Jump to content

Tilion

Members
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketeer
  1. Hey folks, just been messing about in KSP recently (I blame DasValdez and the other KSP streamers who've got me re-invigorated for the inevitable crash-fest that is me playing over-modded KSP on my old & knackered machine) and I finally decided to start posting a few things, though as I explain in [thread=107879]my concurrent 'Rocket Builders' thread[/thread], I may be slow to do so. Anyway, to the reason for this post, I present to you: Seradyne Space Systems Tau-class Advanced KMU (Kerbal Maneuvering Unit) 1-Kerbal EVA Work Craft | 2.6Km/s DeltaV | KAS Gear Storage A versatile KSP craft based on the Mk2 Drone Core that fits neatly in a Mk3 Cargo Bay. The perfect long-range in-system workhorse for your Kerbals, it has a hefty DeltaV allowance, carries four KAS containers as standard and acts as a tug/equipment carrier when docked with probes, small craft or custom cargo modules. Required mods: KAS, Flag Decals. DOWNLOAD from KerbalX Please note that this is a sub-assembly, rooted at the docking port ready for insertion as payload in whatever craft you create. So, whaddaya think, folks? I've found it to be exceedingly handy for carting KAS enabled supplies around and less troublesome than some of the smaller MMU's I've made/tried in the past, and frankly that Mk2 Drone Core was just begging to be used for something like this... Now, could I have done it without the Flag Decal - yes, but I kinda like the mod and this is the first of my craft I'm putting up here all under the 'Seradyne Space Systems' banner, so I wanted just a hint of self-promotion! Now, of course, if you don't like the decal mod (KAS is kinda the raison d'etre for this craft anyway) it's simple enough that with the supplied pics you'll quickly be able to build it yourself (there's a small RCS tank in the middle of the cluster - that's the only non-visible part). Now the only remaining question is: Is it manouvering, manouevering, maneuvring or something entirely different?
  2. I'd changed SOI a couple of minutes back and warped towards my next node, IIRC, yes - I'd just switched back from map mode when I got 'blanked'.
  3. Yep Heimdall, this is the same thing alright, with a few variations perhaps. Don't know why I didn't see your earlier post, but it just didn't 'twig' for me as being the same issue (but then I've been particularly derpy on the forums today). As I said at the start of my post I'm not even really looking for official support on this - it's just 'one of those things', thankfully I wasn't desperately far into that particular playthrough so I didn't lose anything too amazing... I'd likely feel rather aggrieved otherwise. I'll take another crack at the save files, renaming an old one as you suggest. The adage is to save often, backup those saves frequently and don't overstress your system I suppose. That said, I'm loving KSP as much as ever and will put up with errant oddities like this while likely still stretching things to the memory limit with a plethora of mods...
  4. We might not be able to get support - I'm not sure if I'm even asking for help (my pc is barely running KSP with the modicum of mods I have installed so I know things will go wrong now & again), but I thought I should at least try to document such weirdness seeing as it just happened to me too. Though I didn't get pictures of everything the few below should give some idea of the situation... I'd be interested to know if anyone else has had similar issues and any way round them, of course. The Blankety-Blankness: a disappearing ship in KSP that takes the rest of the universe with it... Well, I'm just coming in for a Munar circularisation burn when all a sudden, my craft is flung who knows where, all Buck Rodgers like... The views are blank, nothing visible in any camera mode, IVA (externally blank - the internals were there with similarly wonky readouts), EVA (though thankfully my sacrificial offering managed to cling to the non-existent hatch and haul himself back into the safety of the invisi-pod) or on the now-blank map. Also the navball is conspicuous by its blankness. According to the info window I'm now on a Kerbol escape trajectory... I knew I was pushing my trusty ol' laptop to the limit mod-wise but it seems I've lost an entire career now as yup, you guessed it - KSC is blank too. Restarted it a few times but that entire career (from any worthwhile point) is kaput, just loads up BLANK from quicksaves, regular saves or the main persistence save. Yes, I know there's a few out-of-date mods listed on the JSGME picture, but they're not enabled - everything I've got active is up to date to the best of my knowledge and was working fine for several hours even though I'm stuck running 32-bit with 3gb memory allocated. There were no error files as the game didn't crash and only the scene stuff was missing (couldn't check KSC's scenes as there wasn't anywhere to click to go to tracking/vab/sph etc.), buttons were present throughout and functional (albeit providing no / nonsensical info) so I could still exit out to the menus. So, any ideas folks? Help seadart & I or at least, commiserate!
  5. Please delete [thread=92420]this thread[/thread] - I was a derp. Oooh, done very promptly. Ta muchly!
  6. Peak'd Cap Challenge: Land and balance a small lander atop the highest mountain in the near-KSC range. Can use a rocket or plane to deliver the lander with your choice/combo of chutes/powered landing. Only rule - no VTOL delivery vehicle!
  7. I don't know how deep I'd want to go into some of these things, but a Recovery Facility should certainly be on the list of key additions once money and rep come into play - here you will be able to store all recovered craft, recondition them or break them down to their components (putting the parts or the craft into another tab of available parts for future VAB/SPH use) or donate them to a museum for increased rep.
  8. Well, tetryds, thanks for the feedback - I was just looking for a way to quantify Snuggler's idea in relation to the science & such. Tying each point boost to specific easily-correlated gains seemed the best way. Re. the Fame thing (I'm gonna live forever, I'm gonna learn how to fly - high!). We're not IRL here, we're the KSP: a planet-hogging, species-defining, all-encompassing endeavour. The lil' guys are bound to be a tad more well-known than Earth's astronauts, but I do see your point. Maybe what the Fame 'skill' needs is a very slow degradation while stuck in the astronaut centre, so unless your Kerbal has that 'title-equivalent' permanent boost from say, 'First Kerbal Munar Surface EVA' or similar (or is one of our orange-suited heroes) then all their accomplishments are, eventually, for nought...
  9. Yep, in general, this is the best compromise so far - assuming the guys would actually want to implement something like this... To put my own twist on & maybe refine Snuggler's system, I would suggest having just a 0-10 skill level (Jeb of course, cranked up to 11) being far simpler to both operate and comprehend (re. the skill level to effect ratio): All Kerbals may have pre-existing aptitudes giving an extra +1 to +4 per field, only two fields may be raised to the +3/+4 level. Only the original trio and certain mission specialists start with higher ranked abilities. Further skill gain can only be accomplished by experience. Flight - All Kerbals bar mission specialists would start with Flight 1 (could of course, be higher with aptitude) which is enough to operate craft (never a change or penalty to craft) but at level 1 they would still suffer G-LOC easily - the consequence of which (other than hilarious new animation) would be an inability to do any science from that vessel until they've recovered. Beyond the G-LOC effect, a mission/contract may require something like 'Pilot must have >= Flight 5', Skill gain e.g.: 'Returned to Kerbin from High Orbit: Flight +1', 'Spent One Day in Space: Flight +1' Planetary Science - Kerbals may start with 0 skill in this field, each point provides 2% increase in planetary science output - whether recovered or transmitted, capped at 40% bonus (two level 10 Planetary Scientists). Skill gain e.g.: 'Taken 5 Surface Samples: P.Sci +1', 'Performed EVA in Extrakerbestrial Biome: P.Sci +1', 'Provided Extrakerbestrial High Atmosphere Crew Report: P.Sci +1' Space Science - Kerbals may start with 0 skill in this field, each point provides 2% increase in space science output - whether recovered or transmitted, capped at 40% bonus (two level 10 Space Scientists). Skill gain e.g.: 'Performed 1 Hour Orbital EVA: S.Sci +1', 'Processed 10 Scientific Reports: S.Sci +1','Cleaned 5 Science Instruments; S.Sci +1' Engineering - Kerbals may start with 0 skill in this field and Engineering 1 is required to perform repair functions; each point provides 2% increase in crew report output. 2% reduction in transmitting cost to both sci. loss & electric charge (due to better resource/equipment management), capped at 40% bonus (two level 10 Engineers). Skill gain e.g.: 'Performed First EVA Repair: Eng. +1', 'Transmitted 30 Reports: Eng. +1' Fame - Kerbals may start with 0 'skill' in this field, each point provides 2% increase in mission reputation (in addition to all the great intangibles Capt. Snuggler mentioned for 'Coolness'). Capped at 50% (launching massive ships with loads of Kerbals aboard IS inherently gonna be more reknowned, even if only in 2% increments). 'Skill' gain e.g.: 'Performed First Ever Orbital Flight: Fame +2', 'Safely Returned from First Ever Mun Landing: +5' As you can tell from my envisaged skill gains, several of these things (primarily Fame!) would ding when you recover the Kerbal's craft, though the science stuff is aimed more for slowly developing skills during missions. Mission Specialists I would change up a bit from the Capt.'s definition, though keeping their appearance in-game linked to a particular mission/contract objective. Each one would have to be uniquely configured for the mission, of course, but as a general rule I would give them 0 Flight skill as standard, unless they specifically required it (e.g.: Report on Jool's atmosphere during aerocapture) - they aren't there to do the flying. You could build whatever variant of MS you can envisage within these parameters depending on the mission and they would only really come into play for their presence at a key mission checkpoint (as in the example), without which the mission fails. As an added bonus, an MS's skills still benefit other phases of the mission, though I would not allow them to gain experience. ?!?...Sorry 'bout the big gaps - there's only a single line space between things when I edit...?!?
  10. Yeah, it's great to have built in but certainly needs a user-customisable folder structure, accessible from in-game if possible... Hopefully there'll be some movement on that in a future update.
  11. I was very happy to get 721 science for my first Mun landing (close orbit with EVA's over several biomes, landing with several sample pickups)- and Jeb's still sitting there waiting to travel further when I can develop a rover & bag more points all of which were gained via transmission. Wondering what the total tally might be before he gets home! Jeb's got a wait on his hands now though - that heap of points has taken me towards building an interplanetary surveyor probe - it might not do the grand tour in one go but it'll be decent, once again departing from my actually preferred 'sample return' style and sticking with transmitting repeated readings till I have 90% or so of the full return value.
  12. Each module can only hold one experiment's set of results, so when you're doing a decent tour of the system and want to get the highest value research back home for all the science points, multiple modules is the only way to go - I wish I'd added another capsule for all the higher-value EVA reports before I'd finished too but I just transmitted the crew stuff! Full tour of science above Kerbin, round the Mun and just filled the last container as I re-entered (missed the high-alt. atmospheric test as I focused on the launch). P.S.: I don't show the splashdown, 'cos, well - I was rather focused on keeping it all level (it does tip a bit, but I could detach the cockpit at the last moment if needed) anyhoo, it came down straight at 4.7m/s nice & survivable; the only reason it wasn't over land is it's quite early in the tech tree so minimal control going on anyway - plus I WAS coming in rather hot from a Mun gravity assist/flyby off a Kerbin Polar orbit.
  13. I didn't trust those energy-hogging antennas, that's what I did. Get me data back on the ground (or in the water) and leave the guys yattering away on the radio with crew reports! I needed a viable way to return plenty of data from all round the system, so, I built myself a science drop-pod and really had my eyes opened as to the best way to do an orbital geo-survey: <iframe class="imgur-album" src="http://imgur.com/a/xATEt/embed" frameborder="0" height="550" width="100%"></iframe>
  14. Behold The Krakening! Yep, looks like a titchy little Kerbal-born octopus evolved into our well-beloved spaceborne scourge. Though how we've had so many problems before we had the science tech to even send it up to the big black is still a mystery. I will admit I didn't initially twig the octopus/kraken link - I was expecting the poor little blighter to transform into a certain goo we're all about to become too familiar with - I've heard it gets EVERYWHERE...
  15. Love this! I've previously done lots of .cfg editing to make my own all-in-one service modules and used fairing factory to get a range of custom BPC's (shame proc. fairings can't manage 'em yet) which I've .cfg edited to be able to soak up / deflect the heat from my multitude of escape systems, but I'll be the first to admit I'm hopeless and helpless at the modelling/texturing side of things so I'm very pleased to get a hold of this - you can be sure it'll get quite a lot of use from me. Hope you can come up with something similar for the 1.25m capsule - currently I'm going with a 'Recovery Unit' which is just the capsule/port/docking lights/ladder/chutes (+ sciencey bits soon, no doubt) and they're attached to the main combined pusher LES/SM I call a 'LEOSMP': Launch Escape, Orbital Support & Manoeuvering Pack Tiny Decoupler Z-200 Battery RTG 2x Round-8 Toroidal Fuel Tanks Oscar-B Fuel Tank FL-R25 RCS 8x Cubic Octagonal Struts & Bits of SpaceTape 4x RCS Thrusters 4x OX-4L 1x6 Solar Panels 4x Communotron 16 16x Sepratron Escape/Retro-Re-entry Motors 8x Linear RCS Thrusters Rockomax 48-7S Engine
×
×
  • Create New...