Jump to content

Azimech

Members
  • Posts

    5,445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

7,729 Excellent

Profile Information

  • About me
    Nos omnes rabidus
  • Location
    The Netherlands
  • Interests
    My girlfriend, my cats, playing bass guitar and guitar, astronomy/astrophysics; history, physics: hydraulics/pneumatics/mechanics; flight sims, my own built car, ambient noises, gardening & growing my own food, geography, modeling & modding, good sci-fi & fantasy.

    Music: Frank Zappa, world music, rock & metal.

    Favourite food: salads (no, really!)

    Favourite colour: super-intelligent shades of the colour blue. They demonstrate their dissatisfaction with the Universe by holding their breath until they turn a deep purple.

Recent Profile Visitors

20,481 profile views
  1. I'll continue with creating stuff like helicopters, cars etc. Because I've discovered space is amazingly boring. At least in KSP1. The editor is the major selling point of KSP1. The whole space stuff ... nah. KSP2 devs: think of another product parallel to this one. Look at how Automation is connected with Beam NG: Drive. I'll be using multiplayer to race cars, helicopters and airplanes with the people who want to. https://gfycat.com/kindsadbufeo-helicopter-chopper-kerbal-space-program https://gfycat.com/skinnyknobbyhart
  2. Jet engine smoke. Unless above 7.5 clicks.
  3. Can't see the video over here. Do you have another link?
  4. If I proposed a hardcore simulation, I would go far beyond that. I've been playing using this game since version 0.16, 2012. This game has never been for anyone. And the complexity has been added over the years. In some ways it already is a mechanical maintenance game. Why need an engineer of a certain level to repair a wheel or solar panel? Getting that engineer to that level is already micromanagement - the tedious type. And that wasn't my idea. By the way, for intelligent games like this one, increasing complexity over the years seems to be a standard in this industry. KSPIE/RO are vastly more complicated than what I propose. Let's agree to disagree.
  5. What I've never understood in KSP is why control surfaces and landing gear don't draw power. Either stamina from the kerbal when using mechanical linkages and direct control or hydraulic/electric. In real life you get the stiffening of controls at high speeds and a lot of pilots died because they couldn't get out of a dive. I'd prefer if both hydraulic and electric can be added, with a loss of pressure and hydraulic fluid when damage occurs. A fluid storage container, pump driven by APU or engine. Multiple pumps needed when the amount of control surfaces/landing gear goes over the pressure/flow limit of the pump.
  6. I don't like rovers. I like cars. All stock. Just painted. My own car: Citroën BX 1985. Older unpainted Dodge Charger R/T 1969, stock. And some of these were made into capable of driving on other worlds. https://gfycat.com/uncomfortablemadeuparrowworm
  7. Excellent thinking! Thanks for the effort!
  8. Thank you! It really makes the whole experience of a fly-by more real. I made this short video almost 6 years ago. The sirens are my own mod. I think I still have that version of Camera Tools on my HD. Could take a while to find it. In case you need it, let me know.
  9. Nice! I remember making the very first edits in the configuration files of BDArmory to create the first prototype. I see all of the guns I created are still there. We tested it in combat and we liked it. Then I gave development away. Maybe, if I'll ever find the time, I'll compete again with dogfights. Maybe in KSP 2?
  10. Nice. Is the doppler effect working again?
  11. I agree. Imagine a planet where cloud cover is such that you can't use solar panels. At least you could build a wind turbine, which is a challenge in itself to maintain and control. Also ... sail a ship to conserve energy on Laythe. And let's face it ... flying an airplane above Kerbin is way too easy. Easy for me to say having used flight sims since 1983. So that's why it should be optional.
  12. I'm here, just checking every once in a while. Not active with the game atm. Waiting for KSP2.
  13. Well, I apologize. I've been inactive for a number of years now. The 1.4 update really threw me off and since then I've felt the game has been going in a direction I don't like. I've lost my confidence in the original KSP developers. And I certainly do not like hanging on to relics of, in my opinion, bad design decisions. But I could've written it in a less snarky way.
×
×
  • Create New...