[Radial goes beyond 8x (nice bug though.)]

If its easy to get rid of and easy to get to, and it has some practical gameplay use, then its not a bug.

Its called an accidental feature

[What Would You Like to See In KSP?]

More planets. I swung 'em all sister. 0.18.4 was the last update with a planet in it.

Before squad shout MUH UNITY LIMITATIONS. Find a workaround. Your responsiblity

[Squad have stopped caring]

No it's not, imagine General Motors beeing responsible for the car YOU broke by modding it.

I know when they release it will be perfectly fine. That's what the testers are here for.

Those testers weren't very good when .21 and .22 both rocked up pretty much unplayable because of the bugs

[Squad have stopped caring]

Earlier updates may have seemed faster and better, but it's always easier to pick the low-hanging fruit. Once they started getting into the more complicated features, it takes longer to do and more can go wrong. As for 64-bit, that's the Unity engine, not Squad. Squad only put out a 64bit version because some modders found a way to force it to run in 64bit, but forcing something to happen is always asking for trouble.

Squad put it in their game. If the game is released and it crashes when a reasonable number of mods, then it's their responsibility to fix it. When its released, and reviewer is reviewing it and it isn't working, they'll tear it a new one. Either wait for Unity 5 (which I would recommend) or begin fixing it (which i also recommend)

[Squad have stopped caring]

If you know what you're posting is going to cause a lock, don't post it. I'm not saying you can't think what you think, or express what you think, but doing it like this is just bad form.

If you are getting annoyed about the inb4lock bit, than you have pretty much missed the point of the post. I am criticizing Squad as developers. That largely exists to make any overzealous mods think before silencing any dissent in their echo chamber.

[Squad have stopped caring]

I've been playing since 0.16. In that time I've seen KSP evolve from a brilliant prototype into a bit of a mess. Back then, Squad could churn out a massive update (like 0.17 or 0.18) in a third of the time, and the updates were brilliant. KSP is one of my favorite games but its pretty bad when Squad have more community mangers than developers. The latest updates have taken massively longer than the earlier ones and were pretty much dead on arrival, I appreciate that the newer updates were more complex, but at least bugfix better. And don't get me started on 64-bit version. Instead of shoving a few more buggy and broken features onto the pile and shouting "Done!" take some time out to make the current features better. As it stands what KSP needs is a few good optomization updates and making the 64 bit version playable.

Leave new features (at the moment) to modders who can accomplish far more in a fraction of the time as a hobby no less, and with far more polish.

before people shout "Judge the game, not the developers", the game is linked to the developers. Their practices affect the game.

I love KSP, but it seems the developers don't, and I want this to change.

inb4lock

[Anyone around here plays Aurora?]

I thought you would talk about aurora wager...

That is also a good game, but for different reasons.

[Anyone around here plays Aurora?]

Aurora:

Its a 4x game and it is described as the Dwarf Fortress of the 4x genre.

It is very complex. The UI is minimal to say the least, but it is a very a deep and engaging game.

Almost all equipment has to be designed.

LINK: http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php

[BSA - British Space Agency [Pic Heavy]]

Patriotic, and verging on Nationalist... Well, I needed a reason for Britain to make it's own rockets, and the ESA is the thin holding back...

IMHO I feel that Britain has done very well under the EU.

[BSA - British Space Agency [Pic Heavy]]

I find you wanting to split from the EU... Disturbing.

[KMP v0.1.5.1 [0.23] [alpha] [inactive]]

I cannot smegging believe this is up.

*Squeals*

Joint station, here I come

[Lots of upcoming space-games, not sure which to play.]

Space engineers is worth a look, its by the same people as miner wars.

[What do you think of the new Communotron 88-88 design?]

I prefer the new one, as it makes more sense on my my interplanetary probe to have a large 2.5 antenna, rather than a 1.25 m one.

[Is there are way to increase the efficiency of transmissions?]

I was wondering, since the only way get 100% efficient science is to get the module back. is their some way to increase the efficiency from 20%, which is far too low for a science to payout to make not returning the craft not an option.

[slightly perplexed by the "kerbal science" vid]

Does this mean that the Kraken will return to snap off my engines?

[Issues i have with the order in which things are unlocked]

Oh, and if the MK.I pod has reaction wheels, why does the SAS come later?

[Issues i have with the order in which things are unlocked]

I know that Kerbin has no industry that does not directly relate to aerospace development, but there are some technologies that are essentially the same thing, but where they are on the tree is totally arbitrary, as struts are are higher than yhe structural parts.

Surely if there is access to sort metalwork to make a latticework of struts, and struts are like that, but slightly easier to make. They re just long pieces of metal. if you have access the sort of facilities to make cryogenic fuel tanks, then you build a long piece of aluminum.

The same with decouplers, which are similar to SRBs, and I'm sure that it is quite easy to make a decoupler.

[[1.3.0] Kerbal Engineer Redux 1.1.3.0 (2017-05-28)]

Does it still work on 0.22? I was expecting it to not work at all, which is the norm after an update.

I'm going to have a look over and re-compile with the latest libraries tomorrow anyway.

It works, but I'm unsure where it comes into career.

[The Grand 0.22 Discussion Thread]

.22 made me realize how much I miss gimbals, struts and fuel lines.

[The Flavor Text Thread]

Crew Report at 206,000,000,000 (or a very far distance)I wish I'd remembered my thermal vest.

When close to the sun Where's the sun cream?

[Need some help with Astronomy homework]

I was set the task of proving that the earth's orbit is heliocentric in my astronomy homework, (one of the greta things about being on the register of people that are good ats science at my school and living in Greenwich, London, I can attend the Royal observatory's astronomy course through my school, free of charge).

I have done the whole thing about the parallax of star, and I was tempted to write a basic description of a Hohman transfer, in order to explain.

Is there anything else I should include?

[What do you want to see in .23]

I'd like to see the whole of c7s planes overhauled and a new aerodynamic model, and the parts that a relevant from b9 ( wings, engines, intakes, cooling manifolds and railings ) and have them stockified

[A worry about the tech tree]

I think that experienced players will breeze through the tech tree in a couple of hours.

I'm still really excited for some pretext to do a new space programme, but before I can really get to work doing all the orbitally constructed spacecraft, I have to be quite high in the tree.

I propose for a second tree.

It should be procedural, and it offers improvements, like 5% weight reduction on tanks etc, and these have increasingly high costs, so that I still have an excuse for fitting a top of the range craft with all the SCIENCE! Parts and communications parts.

[What planet scares you the most?]

Probably Jool, I've lost multiple craft Aerobraking around that monster.

[Will the upcoming update delete my saved spaceship designs?]

If your using r&d, you basically will lose your crafts, as you will need to develop new ones with the parts you have.