Jump to content

Axder

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • About me
    Rocketeer
  1. I dont know, there were few bugs, like flipping of pods but it was super quickly removed. So I am happy and having a blast playing KSP again. I dontr realy get the drama there are always bugs in release versions of every game ever.
  2. I am planing to capture a few asterodis, put them in Low Kerbin orbit and use them as refueling station. The first investment will be higher than landing on minimus, but later it should be easier with fact than no inclination burns and overall easier acces. But there is also my Plan is to create a Ship than can go anywhere exept eve which refuel betwen missons on Low kerbin orbit and crew and experimnts will be carried down wit SSTOs .... so i will have a nice space program that cost prety much zero funds to run.
  3. Well it depends You can put two people in identical car, but one will make the same trip with less fuel consumption and probably will drive safer. I belive same can be used to kerbals it is esencialy them who are driving the rocket not you (well you are, but you could get my point) Also better pilot would use less RCS. I admit there is not that many non technical profesions availeble right now. But you could simiary argue it doesnt matter which rock you pick up if you are carring that rock back home for observation.
  4. With upcoming patch Kerbal experience is beeing added. And I belive it is ideal place to implement profesion system for Kerbals. I envision it like there would be Pilots, Scientist, Engieners, Miners, Drivers etc. Pilots: Craft has better torque and rotates faster Scientist: There EVE reports and surface samples yields more science Engieners: Engines consume 1% less fuel Miners: When resources are implemented they will harvest more faster. Drivers: Rovers can go faster and flat tire happens less often. Or it could be made by skill trees so you could pick perks for your kerbals, but by picking one would cancel option of having another perk. This system would also benefit using multi seat comand pods, becouse right now, there is no reason to use them.
  5. 18$ in November 2012, I belive it was like two weeks before first kerbalkon. I have been playing demo for a half a year at that time
  6. With wheels anything is possible.
  7. Well for me its space shutle made by Top Gear crew. It was basicaly car turned into space shutle, with real life boosters and everything and it even achived I belive one kilometr. and here is whole video
  8. Well if Eeloo is right now Pluto Analog My bets are on Charons analog for Eeloo. (Or gas planet two oh god please be a gas planet two, I will love you without rings I promise)
  9. Thats odd I am running lowest posible settings, and my horizon Lag is just terible i was launching 60 parts SSTO and was still runing like 1 second took 2 seconds. I am guesing my 512 mb eadeon is getting old for KSP :-(
  10. Well I will add my two cents. 1) Why are people angry? Becouse they were promised resources last kerbalkon, being scraped spring 2013. If I remeber corectly thats what costed Damion his position as a comunity manager. If I remeber corectly it was something about building bases and complex mining was considered being added as a expansion. And outrage was quie suvire. So people are waiting a year for this feature, which could again revolutunaze the way we play a game. (Unlike science, which is curently just play a game with less parts) 2) Multyplayer is wierd, and will be wierd. How anybody ever said hey man lets play flight simulator on this lan party. (Well nobody ever) Becouse map is fricking huge and you can both be on other side of the universe literaly. With KSP added time warp it boils down to actualy one person is playing and rest is either waiting or building in VAB. Only momens which could be fun is shared building of space stations and bases. But i dont think its a good move. Veteran players are alredy getting kinda bored, and teaching your friends orbital mechanics is fun. But not in a long run or if you are playing alone. As for ongoing debate. I completly agree that mining resources and fuel, makes things super easy. It is true. I instaled kethane and it is easy to just strap bunch of parts and do a grand tour with OP self suficient lander. My imaginary idea off one day implemantaion of resources will be some sot of colony mechanics combined with curency. In the end we will be able to put VAB on Duna or Gilly. Prefrebly like you land this 5 super heavy pars 2 km apart and kerbals would actualy build something out of it. And than you can buy parts there for some extreme cost, which can be lovered by bringing more miners or other buildings. I strongly belive that astronaut recruitment complex could have more categories. Like pilots scientist miners, drivers etc. With each having sosme bonuses. ANd lastly as for squad, I completly understand why you comunicate as you comunicate. I was in some sort of a same endevaur, and in the end you just have to comunicate like a lawyer becouse anything you say will be used against you.
  11. I realy like how are moviesand so droping fantasy theme and are more and more sci-fi or universe focused (Hobbit is rather rarity living from succes of LotR) I realy like it, becouse that is the thing which will get us back to space.
  12. Well curiosity is als this big I belive. But yep its quite big.
  13. Well this is kinda different, I am from Czech republic and we used to have comunist party as leading party before 1990, and even if some people changeges on highest spots. It doesnt realy makes difference. You set goals and even if they blow, then you cover it and party survives as a whole. That also a reason why they dont do so much livefeeds as we are used to from NASA. Failiure is not accapteble and so you only say good news, and rarely the bad news. For example gagarin was officialy published after he returned, not when he launched, and chernobyl tragedy was published weeks after explosion. Its comunist habbit to hide bad news, and say god news with big publicity.
  14. Well they got me interested. I belive that their next misson is achiveble with curent tech and launch vehicles. And I admit that i started considering giving them money for support. I admit that i kinda hope that my 10 bucks could actualy lead to the first mars colony, even if that colony fail. Also here is the link for the foundreiser. I am quite astonished how much money they raised, just in one day. http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/mars-one-first-private-mars-mission-in-2018 EDIT: Added link
  15. I always wondered if there would be problem with tectonic movement when building Space elevator, becouse for example africa is slowly moving towards europe etc.But on the other hand i can easely imagine cableless space elevator which would work for example like maglev train. You could achive much higher velocities while traveling up.
×
×
  • Create New...