• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

431 Excellent


About tomf

  • Rank
    Sr. Spacecraft Engineer

Recent Profile Visitors

4,801 profile views
  1. I've found an interesting feature. The config and the description text for the toroidal antiproton tank say that it should hold 10,000 antimatter and it is priced with a base cost of 10,000 + 100*10,000. However when I add it to a craft it has an antmatter capacity of only 250 and costs 985,000when empty. This is in a test install with only warp plugin and community resource pack installed. I also tried deleting the dlls in the plugin directory and then the tank behaved as normal, so I think it is something in the plugin code that is messing with the capacity. All the other antimatter tanks are behaving as expected.
  2. I'm landing on Troni from the other worlds pack and I'm finding that wheels, lander legs and drills keep falling through tthe surface. Is this likely to be an issue with Kopernicus itself or with the planet pack? It doesn't look like the planet pack has been updated in a while. can anyone suggest a similar pack that is still being worked on?
  3. I think that with interstellar bon voyage is seeing the same problems as mentioned with kerbalism a few pages back. Interstellar has replaced the modules on all the solar pannels to ones that bon voyage doesn't recognise. Would it be possible to add this support as well?
  4. That does sound like a bug and I have no idea what is causing it. Would you be able to pm me a save file so I can try to reproduce? I'll need to know what other mods are required to load the save.
  5. Sorry I should have said, I'm still on KSP 1.7.3 as I'm using Kopernicus. I will wait for Kopernicus to update and retry on 1.8
  6. Hi, I wanted a fuel tank that could be carried by a kerbal as a jerry can so I modded the dumpling tank to be a back-carried item. This seemed fine when I tried it with an empty tank but when I tried to pick up a full tank the mass of the tank seems to increase every frame so by the time my kerbal walked to where he was supposed to drop the tank it now weighs 264 tonnes. The MM config I used to patch the dumpling @PART[externalTankRound] { MODULE { name = ModuleKISItemEvaTweaker carriable = true equipMode = part equipSlot = jetpack equipBoneName = aliasJetpack equipPos = (0,0.21,-0.3) equipDir = (10,0,0) runSpeed = 0.8 } } Is it possible to do what I want?
  7. Yup I have finally given up waiting for Kopernicus and recompiled for KSP 1.8. A few minor code changes but nothing affecting functionality.
  8. The vis-viva equation is the one you want to look at. given PE and V you can find a (the semi major axis) and from pe and a you can get AP
  9. Updated to 1.8! I haven't been dead but I haven't been playing 1.8 as I need Kopernicus to update but I've given up waiting and released a 1.8 version As well as supporting 1.8 station science now supports generating contracts for bodies other than the default KSP ones supports not having Kerbin as the home body (untested) New contracts don't require newly launched experiment modules - if you are organised and send all the experiments in advance of getting contracts for them that's ok with me.
  10. I'm currently surveying a small moon rumoured to be rich in resources (C2-1 from the other worlds pack) I want to scan it for resources using the stock resources scanner. However the scanner has a minimum altitude of 25km to operate while the moon has an SOI of only 9km altitude. Is there anything in the configuration I could change to either change the minimum scanning altitude or hack the SOI to make scanning possible?
  11. To give some numbers the thrust of a photon drive is the power of the beam / the speed of light so a 1Mw laser gives a thrust of 0.003 Newtons. The ISP is 30,000,000s though
  12. They worried enough about this before the first trinity test that they did the calculations The answer turned out to be very comfortably no though.
  13. I'm looking to go interstellar so I'm looking for the ISP. I thought that what was required for the magnetic nozzle was a reactor that produces charged particles and a supply of Hydrogen fuel?
  14. I'm getting a new error in 1.8 Uploading Crash Report MissingMethodException: Default constructor not found for type kerbal_impact.ImpactContract at System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceMono (System.Boolean nonPublic) [0x0007b] in <ad04dee02e7e4a85a1299c7ee81c79f6>:0 ImpactContract is an abstract class and isn't supposed to be instantiated at all. This worked in previous versions but now seems to be blowing up the whole contract system. Is there a simpler workaround than simply not using the abstract class?