dlrk

I've got an excellent system and my performance goes to hell anytime I approach another spacecraft.

Does this work with FAR?

I had the freezing problem, which the single-thread DLL fixed.

Is there a way to get terminal velocity in FAR?

Thanks for keeping this in development!

I think the source should be disclosed but the open source requirement should only require modifications to be allowed to the extent necessary to provide continuous support through future updates to KSP. I think that's a reasonable compromise.

Sarbian, your DLL works great for me!

Thanks, I'll check out the beta!

I'd love to see a digital version of these.

I think we've all had the experience of having a seemingly fine rocket disintegrate on the pad, or shortly after launch. Since career mode will presumably penalize this in someway, it would be good to have utility to determine if this is going to happen before launch is attempted. I've seen some discussion on the forum of implementing a 'simulation' mode. Since that might not be a good, or practical, I suggest this: A 'structural integrity check' function in the VAB that will background simulate the physics of the rocket on the pad and/or shortly after launch, and provide either an 'ok' message, or a visual or textual indication of what parts have failed.

With regard to the alt text, does anyone think Orbiter has a great deal of potential, but is disturbingly underdeveloped.

Entitlement is such an airhorn word in this context. For some reason, some people prefer to attack others for wanting things they frequently use to remain operational as 'entitled', rather than discuss how to maintain or replace abandoned, but useful utitlies. Does permission exist for KW to be maintained and kept compatible if it has been ditched?

I'm getting a great deal of excessive wobbling/bouncing. This was fixed by the .dll Sabian posted a couple pages back.

KW works fine in .21, but I'd also like to know if it was ditched.

I use MechJeb, and I love it. I don't use the modes other than Smart ASS because they tend be inaccurate. Smart ASS and the various info displays are indispensable though.

Thanks! Thanks! Thanks! Thank you!

Has the fixed docking cam been released yet?

Yup, the transfer functionality is critical.

At the very least, they should agree to release the source if they choose not to finish it.

I really take exception to this. Squad openly says KSP is unfinished, sells KSP, and now says they have no obligation to finish it?!

This is awesome! I'd love to see some more new avionics, like a speed tape, or better yet a full PFD.

I'd also like one.

Is it possible, using a mod or stock, to see the power or RPM of a jet engine? They take time to spool up, and it's not really practical to go solely by sound.

Suggestion RE airports: Use accurate runway numbers. The runway should be numbered according to compass heading(at KSC, for example, one side is 27, the other is 9).

Just ran across this post, and I'd like to point that that is inaccurate. FAR works fine with Deadly Reentry, I use the two together.