Tristavius

Members
  • Content Count

    192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Tristavius

  • Rank
    Spacecraft Engineer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Interstellar is always an interesting balance. It often at first seems very overpowered but actually it's designed very well as it gives you some powerful technologies but makes you really work for them. Thermal turbojets can make Eve very, very easy and yes, they work on 'atmosphere' and Eve has a lot of that to work with. With a good amount of intakes you'll be able to produce some serious and nearly infinite power. Where the 'work' comes in is you'll need a good source of power for this to happen which means either deploying a few large heavy reactors into Eve orbit (and then using thermal receivers) or getting a good on-board power plant. Fission isn't likely work, Fusion I'm not sure but I'd guess it'll be hard. Antimatter would make life easy but then you need to be able to collect it in decent quantities and get it transferred to your craft.
  2. Have now got to test, and so far loving it! Out of interest, the following... http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/73621-B9-S2-Crew-Tank-IVAs-Mk2-2m-Crew-Tank-0-5-1-(2014-05-22) Would make for an interesting collaboration for IVAs!
  3. On that's good to here, I loved B9 but stopped using a fair while ago. I tend to play long-running games (2 in the 15 months I've been playing) and I'm always very cautious when using modded parts, and even more cautious when a mod falls behind on the updates (even if it still technically works). Just having the author release a new minor patch just saying 'confirmed compatibility with new KSP patch' quickly after the release makes you feel confident that it is supported and will continue to be so. I stopped even tracking B9 after there was a few months of it still reading as the previous patch version but would welcome it's return whole heartedly. Mind you, a few more parts in this pack and I may not need it any more!
  4. Looking great! Can't wait to try it out when I get home. Would like to re-iterate what some people have said, this would be a superb tie-in with Interstellar (water for one and possibly other elements too).
  5. Superb! Been waiting on something like this for ages since B9 stopped being updated. Unfortunately I can't access dropbox (banned by the internet here) so will be a few days until I'm elsewhere and can try it out.
  6. Wow, I've had an old copy of the dev version for ages, kinda thought that was going to be it but woah; that is a VERY, VERY complete package you have there now. Superb, can't wait to try it when I get home in a few weeks (can't get the download from here due to the site it's hosted on).
  7. Ah, of course - should have thought of that really (too much work frying my brain right now). I only touched career mode briefly and wasn't really that interested, I much prefer KSP as a sandbox. Looking at the un-upgraded stats I can see exactly where they fit in compared to un-upgraded fusion. Guess they just look odd from a sandbox perspective, but then I guess there's even stock bits that do too - just part of the necessary structure for career.
  8. Also, since we're here... What is the point in Akula/Sethlans reactors? I just can't work it out! The core temperature is pathetic, less than a third of the main Fission range so the use in thermal rockets is out. The MW outputs are also lower than the equivalent sized main range (though using both DC and KTEC generators can push them past UF4, though not ThF4 fission). The fuel is also harder to come by needing Ammonia or Nitrogen + Liquid Fuel (or Water to make Liquid fuel) to make the Ammonia which basically means a complicated process only possible on Kerbin and Laythe instead of every single planet. Throw in a much lower lifespan (less than 1/4 @ 100% in most cases) and a forced minimum power of 40% instead of 25% and I really can't figure out what the use is. They are a bit lighter, I'll give them that, but that can't REALLY justify it can it?
  9. Ah, He3 seems to have become a bit of a debate! Maybe I shouldn't have gone on about cloud scooping! Well anyway, for my two cents on the issue... Well, I actually just wrote this paragraph slating why there would be He3 on Mun but then I went a did a bit of research and err, well, I guess you're right! The real world moon is supposed to have a bit, all be it in still very small concentrations. I still have concerns about this - Mun would make life just a little bit too easy in my opinion. Mun of course also doesn't have to be an exact analogue of our own, so maybe this idea would work but use it on other bodies. Maybe Tylo would be a perfect place to have some, still making He3 something of a challenge. I also think cloud harvesting is a brilliant fun engineering challenge (far different from yet another 'land a base on X and press extract') and thus should still be the best source of He3. Perhaps this is exactly what Fractal had in mind? The best way to make this more relevant is an quantity increase in Jool. 10x Would make large harvesters like my own able to fill a tank in 12 minutes instead of 120 - a good upgrade. It could even be increased further to allow for higher atmosphere dives to pull in small quantities and deep dives to rapidly fill many tanks. The bigger issue still remains - what the hell is the point of it in Fusion? The larger reactors become worthless and the smaller ones are well, small! By the time you have access to He3 you probably don't need every last Megawatt out of small reactors as you're probably already thinking big by then. It is useful in AIRs, which in turn are a fairly useful reactor but still, it could be a lot better.
  10. Sounds like some good changes, nicely done! Am I the only one who can't download? Getting an SQL Connection Error after clicking the download button on the github page. (Entirely possible it's just me - I'm at sea and on a rather eccentric satellite connection).
  11. Philotical, you're onto a superb and much needed idea here, though for me, personally, you are taking it a little too far. A system to recover non-VAB resources such as KSPI's Antimatter or He3 after landing them on Kerbin and then add them to a rocket on the launchpad would be a brilliant tool and would fill a big hole in those mods. I'm less interested however in a market place and credits and all the rest, especially with the contracts system coming up. It's still unclear (unless I've been missing some dev posts) how 'money' in KSP will work in the long term but creating a whole new system with one around the corner seems futile. I also wouldn't actually like to be able to say, sell Easy Resource A and buy Hard Resource B. Not sure about the collecting on other planets bit either, but I guess it's easy enough to simply not use that functionality if I don't want it - I guess it would be useful for people who use interplanetary construction mods and so on. In short, you're on to a winner, but keep it simple (or maybe release a basic and advanced version). Will be watching with great interest, keep up the good work
  12. Anyone have a link to that inline collapsible alcubierre drive? (Sorry, I promise I have spent about 30 minutes searching and looking!)
  13. Relays only provide line of sight, they do not strengthen the signal so to speak. A ship in orbit of Jool when Jool is at it's closest approach to Kerbin is able to pick up about 30% of Kerbin's power network per large receiver and only about 1% per medium receiver. Considering how awkward large receivers are to work with this is a major pain in the ass. Planets like Jool and Dres when on anything other than the closest alignment aren't going receive any significant kind of power even on a large receiver and the easier to place mediums are only going to provide okay power to the inner planets on close approach. There is of course an argument for building more power stations around other planets. I have about 400 GW on tap around Kerbin, and about 10 GW each at Duna and Jool currently and I'm planning on expanding the Jool grid to start operations on the 5 moons. Currently however any decent sized vessel beyond about Duna orbit really doesn't have any significant power to draw on so there will always be a need for self-contained vessels carrying their own reactors, and I would argue the AIR is a superb one for a large craft, providing good power and respectable ISP for thermal and decent power for plasma. Of course, to get the He3 costs 10's of 1000's of antimatter, which would provide an even better power source so yeah, He3 is still looking a bit mediocre really!
  14. Bah, you guys have totally missed the spirit here! Forget tritium decay, I don't like to achieve anything by just time warping personally - if that's all it takes I may as well just enable it in the VAB and be done with it. That tiny bit in Jool's atmosphere is an engineering challenge that's quite different to what stock KSP provides. Yes interstellar gives resource harvesting on planets, but really landing a refinery isn't much different to landing a 'for-the-hell-of-it' base. Anyway, I too am very disappointed in the returns from He3 in fusion... as has been stated, the 2.5m is utterly useless and can't even power itself and the 3.75m isn't much better. The smaller two do make good use of it, but the gains between the incredibly easy Deuterium/Tritium fuel and difficult He3 are only measured in rather small numbers (about +30% on the 1.25m for example). In short, really not worth it. If the larger two didn't have the weird reductions then maybe for serious power stations the +~30% gain might be useful to some people, but even then, far easier just to add another reactor. What we have all forgotten, myself included however, is the Antimatter Initiated Reactor. Up until I returned some He3 to Kerbin today I haven't even been able to test it, and I get the feeling that's the case for a lot of people (a lot of info about it is missing online as well). Basically it uses 4 resources: Deuterium, He3, UN and Anti Matter. Deuterium comes with 500/500 and He3 must be provided as it starts with 0/500. Both are the 'main' fuel for the reactor and are consumed at the same rate. It took about 191 days @ 100% power to exhaust them (sorry, no qualitative figures yet, experiment results only). UN is provided at 20/20. In the 191 days this figure didn't even move. The wiki shows tiny, tiny amounts being used. The initial fuel will likely last many, many full cycles of the main fuel. Anti Matter isn't provided either and must be stored in a separate tank. In 191 days only 0.01 grams had been used, meaning even the tiny 1g bottle would last for many, many refuels of D/He3. So other than providing a tiny quantity of AntiMatter, it's basically a Deuterium/He3 reactor and it's really quite good. 44 GW is a really very nice chunk of power, better than any Fusion or Fission reactor. It can put most of this out as charge particles too to take advantage of direct conversion generators. The core temperature is a little lower than the larger fusion reactors but better than small fusion and all fission so should give decent thermal rocket ISP. The main selling point though is the vastly tonnage compared to similar performance reactors. Deuterium can also be scooped from Jool, allowing both to be refilled at once. Not 100% sure what I'm going to do with it yet... it might be the solution for a long-distance mothership that has to operate away from the power grid?