[Jeb is truely insane...]

It looks like he's trying to sing dubstep.

[Where is YOUR Jebediah Kerman?]

Dead for the second time in my career save.

[What did you do in KSP1 today?]

@Moar Boosters

What were you thinking!?

He was probably thinking "MORE BOOSTERS!"

I just edited some gameplay video. This time it's my Minmus trip. Accidentally killed another Kerbal (Bob).

[Memorial For The Fallen (Or the burnt, smashed, mutilated and possesed) Kerbals]

I haven't lost one Kerbal in .22 yet....

.....just forgot about those time I reloaded my quick saves.........

I accidentally killed Jeb on my very first 0.22 gameplay video for YouTube. I'm also not using quicksave, quickload, or revert flight buttons.

[More bang for your buck - What would you like next for KSP?]

I'd like to see better aerodynamics.

[What did you do in KSP1 today?]

Gameplay footage from a few days ago, but just uploaded it to YouTube.

[New Landing Legs]

There does seem to be something off with the way the landing legs rebound. I mounted an engine pointed downward to increase force on a lander that I knew could sit near full extension. I compressed the legs all the way down and they only rebounded about halfway. Raising and lowering a single leg caused them all to kind of pop back to where they normally were under the weight they were supporting.

[What do you name your space agencies?]

Which one? My one that I record YouTube videos in is SteevyTable since that is my YouTube name. Otherwise I have "Experiments" and then my main one for myself is just called SteevyT.

[What did you name your first rocket?]

I think every single one of my career mode rockets has been called "Untitled Space Craft" so far.

[The Grand 0.22 Discussion Thread]

Oh now I understand what Jaxal1 was saying. That's the first I've heard that warp drives magically transport a vessel without velocity. Is that a Star Trek concept?

Not sure about that one, I saw it in a mod for KSP 0.21 that Scott Manly reviewed.

[The Grand 0.22 Discussion Thread]

Why wouldn't you be able to turn the ship around and fire the FTL again to bring the velocity back to a maneuverable range?

Because it would be a "warp" drive. It doesn't actually add or subtract any velocity from your ship, just moves it to another location. From a stationary observer, the ship will have the same velocity where it ended as when it started.

[The science parts are outrageously large]

I don't think the goo container is oversized at all. I slap 2 of them on every 1-man capsule I send up.

I throw 6 on the 1-man capsules, but then again, I don't really care how the rocket looks, the single starting parachute is enough to bring the pod, 6 goo canisters, and a communicatron back safely.

[3 launches!]

The way science points are earned really needs to be looked at. It's too easy to exploit, it's too clumsy, and it feels like it's punishing you for not exploiting it. Being able to do like fifteen transmissions on moon rocks, and suddenly there's no point in bringing any back home?

You are only getting 20% of the science transmitting that you would bringing them back. However, the thermometer, barometer, gravimeter, and accelerometer should all transmit 100% rather than the 80% or whatever they do right now. They are just storing numbers, those should be able to be transmitted intact.

[Research Facts Discussion Thread]

There are different crew and EVA reports for low and high orbits around Kerbin, Minmus, and the Mun. (Or at least one of the reports is altitude dependent, I forget which one right now)

[Show off your awesome KSP pictures!]

I made a diamond!

[How Much Science?]

Just kind of curious, what is the maximum amount of science you can get from the Kerbal universe? That is doing every experiment possible until they all return 0 science.

[Is it just me, or is research a bit schizophrenic?]

True, and it is, even in career mode, the thermometer is two tiers closer to the start than the atomic engine. I don't know who started the whole "NERVA comes before ladders" thing, but it isn't that way in 0.22, and wasn't that way in any of the videos shown during the last livestream weekend.

I currently have the thermometer unlocked, no clue where the NERVA is. Haven't seen its node.

[Is it just me, or is research a bit schizophrenic?]

I dunno though. Really simple things- like basic structural parts- seems to me those don't need to be balanced to lategame like, say, mainsail engines, right? Or is there some power to these small strut-made cubes that I've missed? XD

You can do some really cool engine clusters with the small cubic strut. I think that was the thing a lot of (if not most) people used it for.

[What do you think of the new SAS?]

How the SAS does seems to be very heavily dependent on ship design. I have some that it holds rock solid, others it lets wiggle around a bit, and yet others it oscillates, although I haven't encountered any death shakes yet.

[A change of plans when playing career mode...]

I found a way to make radial decouplers using the beams and stack decouplers since there aren't any radial decouplers for a while.

[Show off your awesome KSP pictures!]

May have made my ascent a little shallow.

[Science leads to wonderful things (PIC HEAVY)]

Without science, I never would have thought to EVA while re-entering Kerbin atmosphere. Got something like 25 SCIENCE for that one.

[Not super clear how to accumulate 'science'...]

EVA's while flying through the upper atmosphere produce fun reports.

[The Grand 0.22 Discussion Thread]

Haha I tried to click "Done" on that pic

How'd you get multiple EVA reports? Multiple capsules?

EVA, do report, re enter capsule, wait for new location, rinse repeat.

[what to do afterwards]

It is possible to get to minmus and mun without batterys, the stock command body does not consume electric charge.

I recommend going to Minmus first, then Mun, mun is harder.

This is what I did. I got 475 SCIENCE! from a single trip to Minmus. No batteries.