Hashbrown66
Members-
Posts
18 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
0 NeutralProfile Information
-
About me
Bottle Rocketeer
-
I would add the ability to pull subassemblies out and add them radially. You still have to make space shuttle-esque ships entirely in the SPH because it's impossible to transfer planes to the VAB if the don't have an in-line connection point. Ant engines really have no purpose since they have terrible efficiency and minuscule thrust capabilities. Oh, and they don't get a fairing when you put a decoupler on. Concerning adapters, it would be really nice if some of the larger ones could be tweakable to hold fuel. I've been messing around with some .cfg files and they look pretty nice as fuel tanks. EDIT: Also, Jebediah just won't stay dead! Can we please find some way to keep dead kerbals from resurrecting all the time?
-
More Realistic Science Tech Animations
Hashbrown66 replied to Tripod27's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Yeah, that's been bugging me recently. It's like, "look at my beautifully streamlined lander, with half of it's surface area open and exposed to reentry flames." It's just bad for the aesthetics. -
EVA Science Animations & Activities
Hashbrown66 replied to ddavis425's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I agree, animations for the win! I wonder if Squad is just holding out on adding content until they work through new systems like science and an economy. It seems like there hasn't been a whole lot of new parts/small bug fixes/fine-tuning in the last couple of updates. -
Future of Aerodynamic parts
Hashbrown66 replied to SpenSpaceCorp's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I heard that all the aerodynamic parts are going to get a make-over when the better flight model gets implemented. Let's hope we get artyom to help with the art when it comes around. -
I like colors! p.s. Is that a hand flying away in the Kerbol picture?
-
Research & development projects
Hashbrown66 replied to Atoning Unifex's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I definitely agree that science needs to be more focused. It doesn't really make sense that you take a surface sample from the moon and suddenly your kerbals know how to build mainsails. I think/hope that when they implement an economy some of this will make more sense, like maybe surface samples give you money and science, and research costs money and/or science. Your development and testing ideas were really cool; kinda like bonuses for proving your vehicle is mostly safe or something. -
Can the Mun look like Luna?
Hashbrown66 replied to LostElement's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
That would be cool if they just put a simple sprite or something over distant planets so you can see them in the night sky. Right now Venus is really visible, so it would make sense for you to be able to see Eve. Good idea! -
Scientician Kerbinauts
Hashbrown66 replied to FlamedSteak's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Yeah, like you could choose to take a geologist to get more science from surface samples, or a communications technician to get better recovery rates for science transmissions. -
Wow, love the look of those jets, keep up the great work! I would rather build really nice looking planes with realistic designs than the "intake-spamming, can-reach-Eeloo-without-rockets" approach some people favor.
-
[AAR][Pic Heavy] Race to Space | Now with Chapter Eight!
Hashbrown66 replied to Scorpi15's topic in KSP Fan Works
I'm pretty sure that's the LV-45, or whatever it's called. It's the one that's smaller and can gimbal.