Motokid600
-
Posts
3,858 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by Motokid600
-
-
How does this mod pair with the surface textures the various visual mods? Is there a certain order they should be installed so that Parallax takes priority?
-
Congrats on this release Linx. Really something else. I never would have thought this game could achieve this state. My only question is.. Do you or anyone recommend any visual packs to go along with Parallax? Ive been running AVP for the longest time. Id like to try something new and less resource intensive. I'm kinda out of the loop in terms of the new hotness.
-
Wait.. has there been a new release? Github says no. But the pictures above and in the OP say yes.
-
Is Parallax its own visual pack of sorts? Or does it need to be paired with AVP, SVE, ect?
-
On 7/17/2022 at 1:51 PM, Gameslinx said:
I've been messing around with Duna and decided to go full Mars with it. I'm really happy with how the rocks have turned out - the dust scattered across the top really adds to the environment and helps them blend in
Eat your heart out KSP2.
This looks awesome I cant wait.
-
Well this is a blast from the past. I remember this! Dang... How do folks even find these old threads?
-
On 6/18/2022 at 4:41 PM, Gameslinx said:
"In the desert, the Cheetah lives for 3 years and the Camel lives for 9"
Per-biome scatters will be available on release
Forgive me if this is a silly question. When it comes time for this update to drop what system can we expect it on? The stock Kerbol system or Beyond Home?
-
So if NRHO is more expensive on Dv whats its purpose? Cheaper insertion and ejection?
-
What is the point of the rectilinear halo orbit that Gateway will be on? Is it to tackle the issue of Lunar mass-cons disturbing orbits? Or is it because Orion needs the extra kick from the oberth effect to return home?
-
Is the 1,8 version still valid? I noticed that clouds haven't been creating surface shadows for as long as recent memory. Possibly since using this Redux version. Ive got the full suite of visual mods with AVP 8k. No tufx. I remember years ago clouds created shadows on the ground. And every now and then I see Reddit posts of images containing said shadows. Makes me wonder why they're missing from my install. Maybe just an AVP thing?
-
Im mocking up the bottom of my shuttle/starship with a black "heat shield" flag. Looks good. But I see that the flags have mass. So do they generate lift? I wouldn't want to ruin hours of testing for some cosmetics.
-
It'd be cool if clouds could resemble cold front at least in some way, shape or form. Like with just a healthy mix of all the cloud types. Nothing mechanical. Just visual. The clouds they previewed for KSP2 so far look really good. Although I must say Astronomer's Visual Pack has lightning ( no bolts ) and its amazing. So ill take that in KSP2 too.
-
Im not sure where to ask to solve this, but I figure id try here. I have this circular shadow cast onto the surface of the Mun. It seems to be draw distance of sorts for the ""Celestial bodies cast self shadows." ( will call this CBCSS ) feature. It grows and shrinks based on zoom. Not been elsewhere to see if its a non-atmospheric thing. I believe it is related to the "CBCSS" option in graphics settings. I would prefer to leave it on as it does look better especially with parallax. Within the draw distance of that circular range the shadows look amazing. Im using the full suite of visual mods except for TUFX. I was wondering if maybe an Astronomer Visual Pack issue so if need be ill ask there. Or even Parallax? Not sure where to start.
Edit: It does indeed go away with CBCSS disabled.
Edit2: More pictures.
-
Im not sure where to ask to solve this, but I figure id start here. I have this issue of a circular shadow cast onto the surface of so far the Mun. It grows and shrinks based on zoom. Not been elsewhere to see if its a non-atmospheric thing. I believe it is related to the "Celestial Bodies Cast Self Shadows" option in settings. I would prefer to leave it on as it does look better especially with parallax. Speaking of which im using the full suite of visual mods except for TUFX. I was wondering if maybe an Astronomer Visual Pack issue so if need be ill ask there. Or even Parallax? Not sure where to start.
Edit: It does indeed go away with Celestial Bodies Cast Self Shadows disabled.
-
-
57 minutes ago, BEG5210 said:
How can you make configs? I want to make some configs for engines that don't have any configs. I also want to permanently edit some of the default configs. can someone explain to me how you can do it, or send me a guide?
Thanks!https://github.com/post-kerbin-mining-corporation/Waterfall/wiki/Concepts
-
I meant to delete that bold part, sorry that was my source. XD.
-
On 8/3/2021 at 10:14 PM, CiG Bhungus said:
How can i fix this ?
Do you have Texture Replacer? Go to space center and in TR settings turn off "Personalize Suits".
-
On 7/31/2021 at 7:02 PM, THX-1138 said:
For that specific screenshot I was using KPS 1.11.2 and the previous version of Parallax, v1.2.3 (with physics collisions turned on). Also I was using PlanetShine (no longer recommended to be used along with Parallx at this time). I still have not installed TUFX.
So did everything get brighter with the latest version of Parallax?
-
Well terrain shadows seem to be better all around with that enabled. There does seem to be more depth in the tessellated shadows, but truth be told I really cant tell. It looks a little better. But then some angles are better then others so its hard to say. Its just me being paranoid lol. Ty for your time.
Edit: Hmm. I just alt tabbed back into the game. Tessellation is gone, textures are flat and theres a big block of terrain missing. o.O
Edit2: Scene reload fixed it.
-
Shadows are on 4. However celestial bodies cast shadows is set to false. ( Caused some graphical bugs last I remember ) Could that be not helping? Its not that im trying to get that shot per say. Just want to make sure everything is functioning as it should.
-
25 minutes ago, Gameslinx said:
Make sure your terrain shader quality is set to Ultra and that your graphics card supports tessellation
Quality is on ultra. Card is a 3090 so should be good. Maybe its just me...
Or maybe the user I linked was using a TUFX profile because its way darker. But just in general does that look right to you? I just feel like there isnt an many shadows compared to the other picture. All that is maxed as well.
-
On 7/10/2021 at 10:12 PM, THX-1138 said:
Was just browsing through the thread and saw this. I do not have this level of depth on my install with Parallax. Its there. But much more flat looking at a similar lighting level. Is this a custom configuration? Im using the latest version of Parallax on KSP 1.11.
-
Im not sure if this is a Parallax issue, but I figure ill ask here. This is on 1.11 with Parallax version 1.3.0. Im having some bad fps lag when landing on the Mun. Ive not gotten the chance to try other bodies. It happens only with engines running very close to the surface. Other then that everything runs fine. There are no nullrefs. Everything looks okay in the console. This particular craft has alot of engines for a lander. Six all using Waterfall. I do not have Engine Lighting installed nor Planetshine. Any ideas?
This looks awesome I cant wait. 
[1.12.3] Spectra Visual Compilation 1.6.2 "Horizons" (26th July 2022)
in KSP1 Mod Releases
Posted
Has anyone tried this with Parallax 2.0? Any issues? Is there an order of operations in terms in the install? Because Parallax uses its own textures.