xoknight

My stock N1, sadly it got to the point where it was too big and I lost the craft file soon after

Is that a Wright Flyer?

Really? Like nosing into the ground is survivable?

Tons and Tons of SAS wheels (and possibly rcs), and I had the problem with a similar design of a submarine too. The engines at the back do nothing, the top speed I got was like 0.2m/s.

So detailed, so beautiful, so awesome. 10/10

2 soon mang

You should have a part count limit, a 1000 part ship exploding and sending debris flying is not really good for your computer.

Oh it.. didn't go quite what I planned it to do.... As in it almost flipped on launch and it's aerodynamically unstable.

Well guys, the Hercules MMU Mk-12 is here. The versions before the Mk-7, Mk-8,Mk-9, Mk-10, and the Mk-11 can be found below. The Mk-1 through 6 never made it out of the prototype stages. You may be asking what is an MMU? Well an MMU is an MMU is a Manned Maneuvering Unit, pretty much a souped-up jetpack designed to carry Kerbals farther than they can ever before than their EVA jetpacks. MMU's give more maneuverability, range, and control than the normal jetpacks. Given the time, MMU's become a major necessity and tool on your spacecraft or space station. Like for moving modules around, transporting crew, or just inspecting crafts can be very useful. -The Hercules MMU Mk-7 (original): http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/...%29-%28EDIT%29 . The Mk-7 has maneuverability and control, but less fuel. Also the Mk-7 recently got featured in you tuber Goosexi's 2013 build-off competition: Guess who won? -The Hercules MMU Mk-8: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/...RE%21%21%21%29 The Mk-8 carries more fuel, but at a price of maneuverability. -The Hercules MMU Mk-9: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/...ring-Unit-Mk-9 The Mk-9 carries a bit more fuel than the Mk-7, but less than the Mk-8. It is very maneuverable. -The Hercules MMU Mk-10: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/69150-Hercules-Manned-Maneuvering-Unit-Mk-10 The Mk-10 carries a whopping 380 units of fuel (more than the Mk-7, Mk-8, Mk-9) and is installed with a torch and a SAS wheel. But is bulky. You won't be disappointed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Craft file (PUT IN SUB ASSEMBLY FOLDER): http://www./view/bxasy76vn7mcyjs/Hercules_MMU_Mk-12.craft The Mk-12:

Yea Yea Yea, that's the name I was looking for. Tanks

Hey, how did you display your rocket like that? Is it a program? Looks cool

You are an artist.

Eyyy, Nichijou

Don't use SAS, it's useless

Amazing... just bravo

We told you not to use it...

9/10, Intelligent sounding quotes.

Dude you can totally make that thing an SSTO.

Does 3 blades perform better than say 2 or 4?

Try rotating the props the other way

Nice! What's the part count? +1 rep Edit: Dang need to spread more rep to give more out

Soda, It's a soda drink.

So I'm a 3 year long player of World of Tanks, (still haven't bothered getting a Tier X tank *sniff*) and I'm finally coming up on my tier VIII tank now. It's going to either be the Ferdinand or the Jadgpanther II... Now any long time playing World of Tanks players will know the eternal argument about the Ferdinand and the Jadgpanther II tanks. But I need your opinion on these tanks and which one should I get.

This is probably a mod... and this is from 3 years ago. So I would think that this mod is just gone.