Amram

118 = Γ(Γ(4))-!4 + !(√4) + Γ(4) can only mean one thing, we've planned ahead.......

116 = Γ(Γ(4))-!4 + !(√4) + 4

114 = Γ(Γ(4))-!4 + !(√4) + √4

112 = Γ(Γ(4))-!4 +4/4

110 = Γ(Γ(4))-!4 +4-4

indeed 108 = !(Γ(4))*.4 +4/√4

the ninja strikes again!

ninja! lmao 106 = !(Γ(4))*.4 +4-4

104 = 4!! * (4!! + 4) + 4!!

102 = 4!! * (4!! + 4) + Γ(4)

and 100 = 4!! * (4!! + 4) + 4 Is it just me or have we sped up since Vexx32 last commented?

98 = 4!! * (4!! + 4) + √4

96 = 4!+4!+4!+4! yeah, your right it doesn't like !(√4), deciding that the ! is the 'logical not' symbol instead.

lol, I just launched it into orbit and tried to make it melt, if it couldn't I was good to go.

93 = (√(!(4)))^4 + 4!! + 4 turns out wolfram-alpha does like !4 instead of needing to input subfactorial(4), just wrap it in parenthesis so its !(4). Forcing the correct order of ops required a few parentheses.

Wolfram-Alpha likes it, so im happy with it. Also, an 8 with only one 4, interesting......... 91 = !(4)* !(4)+Γ(4)+4

Which means he will need his coat, since it will be winter again before he comes back in. The research of technology for use in space is not Space research, its Aerospace research. The production of items for use in space is likewise Aerospace industry. What has NASA spent a very large part of its time doing? Is NASA not a space agency? This fervent hatred of aircraft is entirely misplaced in a game that is attempting to emulate the Aerospace industry. The purview of an Aerospace agency involves the atmosphere of any given body as much as it does space near that body. Props are used for the majority of drones to this point, and drones are very useful for applications where a rover is ill suited due to speed/range/terrain. I'll bring it up first, NASA hasn't used aircraft instead of rovers yet. Why? Which planets have they sent things to that had a suitable atmosphere? If Mars had a thick atmosphere, I would imagine prop driven aircraft would have been considered. As it is its so thin that parachutes are insufficient to land rovers, so flight is an obvious no-go on mars. And NASA does play with props from time to time And remind me again, did Squad bring in C7Studios and his parts, to then have aircraft in KSP, or didn't they? Seems to me KSP is not ONLY about space, its about Aerospace.

89 = !4 * !4 + 4 + 4

87 = !4 * !4 + √4 + 4

I disagree. Appreciation of an informative post is something you are sorely lacking. If you haven't the attention span, that's your problem, but don't go harping on Tiberion and citing it as a flaw suggesting that his points aren't clear enough. Having read it, He's not wasting words, literally every line is packed with info, which many of us did not have before. This isn't twitter, texting, nor facebook, and that is no wall of text. That actually borders on short given the scope it tries to cover. I'm somewhat disappointed that anyone would call that far too large to be worth their time. It took me barely a minute to read. You want a wall of text, THIS is a wall of text, by yours truly, and all of it on topic and no longer than it needed to be. Despite its size, I was thanked for the effort, because we do not all as a rule fear 1kb of text. Shame you couldn't be bothered to show a similar courtesy. Tiberion, don't shorten them, make'em longer, it was a good informative post. I'd have read it if it were 20 pages as long as the info kept coming.

Radiators have to be hot to do their job. No wasteheat, no radiated heat either, so the radiators can't do anything at all until you build up wasteheat.Its like the stock engine overheat mechanic. Showing overheat isn't a problem at all, just don't actually max out. Having wasteheat isn't a problem, its just a fact of life, but if you brought enough radiators you will never actually max out, so it won't be a problem.

vexx32, lol, i noticed you hadn't offered one up in a while. Its an amusing little exercise in thinking way outside the box, because your doing things with fours that one normally just doesn't do. I'll be honest, I don't really understand how Γ() works, I just know that Γ(4) is 6, and probably couldn't figure out !5 on my own, but I know that !4 is 9. Then seeing Chrisd857 show off a way to hit 1 with a single four, I got an idea, which lead to this: 1 = !(√4) 2 = √4 3 = √!4 4 = 4 5 = !4 - 4 6 = Γ(4) 7 = Γ(4) + !(√4) 8 = 4+4 9 = !4 10 = 4/.4 Thats a short sample. The idea was to do the same challenge, but using only two fours at most, and hit every number along the way that i could figure out. That way I have those to work with, and can use these to help me achieve other numbers. I've got 60 such pairs between 1 and 150, and another 27 spanning from 216 to 600. Im fairly confident that I could get up near 300. As for Chrisd857, I imagine he'll have the last word at this rate, I don't even..... 85 = !4 * !4 + √4 + √4

82 = √(!4)^4 + 4/4

80 = !4 * !4 - 4/4

Great idea, I too have introduced my head to my desk due to forgetting something that i should know better than to forget. One request in line with keeping the list as small and unobtrusive as possible, could it be made to only show the items you do not have yet? So, with your screenshot, it would only list engines and parachutes, because that's all your missing, you have everything else. As you add things in, they would be removed from the list and no longer shown, because you have power for example, so you don't need the reminder to add power any more.