cfds

I think you mixed up land and sea area of the earth (or you have some advance information from the Netherlands...)

(emphasize mine) But is not exactly that the reason why the priorities should be given by a neutral party? At the moment, this "project" sounds a lot like an invitation to go campaigning for these very pet peeves...

Was there any reason in the game to ever send a Kerbal on EVA and let it stand idle?

Does part clipping actually shield the clipped parts in stock aerodynamics?

Except just merging the parts into a single rigid body when the situation calls for it...

And for some reason, SQUAD has not yet found the manpower to remove the launcher form the release packages.

On-going development is a bad thing when it is just done for the sake of doing on-going development. And at the moment, it does not look like SQUAD has any larger objective they try to reach in incremental steps, it looks more like they think "Hmm, we need a new update to get KSP back into the news feeds. Let's look what we can cobble together".

You are aware that you can buy as many licenses for KSP as you want? Whenever you feel like you need to give SQUAD twenty currency, just buy another one...

Hmm, I could have sworn there already was a revamp of 1.25m tanks and engines around 1.2.2... But I guess it's something for people who are allergic to mods.

If they had any interest in fixing them they would have done so, by looking for, or creating, another system for landing legs. But throwing the hands in the air and blaming Unity does not cost anything and satisfies most players, so why put any effort in it?

The whole problem with the career mode and the tech tree is that SQUAD only did the absolute minimum to not get into any trouble with false/misleading advertising. Harvester wanted only a lol-plosion simulator and the team after him just wants to count money. Actually delivering a quality product was probably never a priority during any phase of development...

So KSP now asks if it may phone home by phoning home? That is like visiting someone at home to ask if one's restraining order is still in effect...

Only if you hit the ground (or another suitable means of sudden deceleration)...

This is actually a pretty small set of combinations and can, again, be brute forced. And I don't see how saving a hash of a fingerprint makes it any less identifiable than saving the fingerprint itself...

Another fine example of SQUAD outsourcing core features to the community and somehow being proud of it...