sanoj688

I never have any trouble with Freudian ships.

This awesome mod doesn't seem to work with Keramzit fairings.. maybe you guys already knew but it's kinda annoying so I hope it can be fixed! Oh yeah and this is one of the best mods out there because being able to change the size of parts just creates so much more possibilities, thanks!

I recommend getting a mod called RCS balancer (or something). I know you aren't doing anything with RCS but the mod also shows your CenterOfMass when your fuel tanks are empty, so you can see in what way the CoM of the craft will change as you run out of fuel. Next thing is that you probably want to redo your craft in such a way that the starting CoM and the ending CoM (ending= out of fuel) are as close together as possible. This will make sure your craft will fly pretty much the same no matter how much fuel is in it. This will eliminate the need of pumping fuel around, which is not easy to do when you are flying.. especially for the more complex crafts. Continuing.. try to put your Center of Lift just in front of your CoM, and try and keep it there as you run out of fuel.. Also I dont recommend all those wings you used, better to keep it simple and use less but larger wings. I recommend a redesign

Is that Sauron?

Beautiful.

You do realize you can just use the speed option and do everything else yourself?

Try Mechjeb, it has a rover autopilot which allows you to set speed, heading but you can also add waypoints which it can automatically follow. Pretty neat.

Simply yes!

I tried the dev version but it didn't come with a readme so I didn't know I had to copy the 3 dlls. So I'm using the client and server from spaceport. Should I still get the dev version?

I stand corrected So if I understand correctly, it's better to use KMP for the time being?

You mean "supposed"? I think any mod is meant to be stable xD

Uh.. you don't have an example?

Wait, DMP? Is that better than KMP?

The bug goes away, although I guess you always have the random chance it simply happens again, but it's worth a try. Much faster than restarting the game.

Isn't there already a mod with custom planets ? But I sort of agree that it's not necessary at the moment because mods do a (for the time being) perfectly fine job. But.. imo it needs to be stock when the game is finished (whenever that may be)

I'm not sure if this was known already, but if you get the 'space center' bug where you can't open the VAB and such, you don't need to alt+f4. You can open the KMP menu, go to options and then do disconnect&exit. Sorry if this was already known xD, by the way I wish you good luck in improving this. KSP multiplayer is awesome

We would be doing the developers and everyone else a favor if we would make an inventory of all the strange cases that would cause problems with a delta-v system. I think a common one is where you have a stage where the engines are pointing upwards and it gets counted as negative Delta-v. It would be beneficial to have all the problem cases written down. There can't be *that* much cases, and I'm sure the community as a whole can put their heads together to come up with solutions, instead of bickering about could go wrong.

Amen brother.

What I want to see before a Delta-V readout, is an Apoapsis readout! And periapsis while we're at it. It's super easy to code and pretty handy when trying to make orbit (don't need to switch to map view) I didn't both reading 11 pages of comments but I really don't think there is a good reason NOT to want THE POSSIBILITY of a Delta-v readout. The only downside is that it takes time to code, but that shouldn't be a reason not to want it! I don't need the stock delta-v readout (or ap/per) any time soon, but I do feel like this needs to be in the final game.

On the other hand: If you think about the destruction it would cause to SQUAD's image if someone found out they were doing bad stuff.. it's more likely they have no interest in lying about the data they gather. But indeed someone with some spare time and a packet sniffer could take a look at the data. First thing I wonder is if the data will be encrypted or not (when it leaves your computer). Though that might not mean anything because it could be a security measure to protect your privacy.. on the other hand, you can't see what they are sending. Ah well. So I wonder what kind of KPI's have been developed. Anyone any idea?

Lalo is developing KPIs, about what I wonder? What does he do again? Project manager? He usually writes something really short. Not good for his image imho.

Don't you mean it the other way around? Because my persistent.sfs is larger in size than my quicksave.sfs But replacing your quicksave.sfs with the persistent.sfs seems kind of useless to me, but it might work. Hehe, nicely done.

LOL I need to try this.

Is this a Mercator style map? Jk who cares, nicely done xD

Happy to help.